rdght91 wrote:Why keep the rule though? You shouldn't be killing anyone unless they fall into those categories anyway (also, ERPers.)
Keep the rule for every OTHER situation that isn't so cut and dried as the ones I stated. For the ones that you aren't sure about.
but make it context specific, if the officer had a damn good reason you shouldn't have to ban them anyways for side-stepping the chain of command and executing someone.
Saegrimr wrote:I don't think ERPers are valid in that way, I could be wrong though its not exactly clear at the moment and practically every admin except me are off doing something for the next week or so.
When it was implimented it was specifically said to be valid salad
Saegrimr wrote:As for the ban recently overturned, it was only a ban in the first place because the HoS apparently had claimed he never gave authorization when he was asked about it, and his word was taken for it. I plan to talk to him about that too once I get a bunch of shit sorted out.
I acknowledge that, my point is as I stated, without that permission, he'd have been shit outta luck, even though the guy was a complete twat, and any rule that rewards complete twats over good honest hardworking red SHITS with protections, needs another look.