Hamfam77 wrote:I still haven't forgiven this pink-haired practicus for roundstart crowbarring me like four times in a row even when I tried to put my wew ladding past behind me. The name Serafall was forever tainted when he forced me to retaliate.
has only 6~ posts or so, all in Ban Appeals, 4 of them in their own appeal
he's probably an alt of someone else
also i can't fuckin tell if this guy is trying to say dante is cool or whether dante was griefing them round start for 4 times in a row, gonna guess he's trying to say he's cool or some shit going by the rest of these surprise posters
Poorman wrote:I think that everyone who hates Dante needs to get over just how fucking salty they are that a better player came in and killed them. Fucking deal with it yourselves, instead of taking it out on the best player Space Station 13 has, or ever will see.
last post was in Early December of 2015, likely hasn't played and can probably be proven via the DB
captain sawrge wrote:he literally just used to play the game
the whole making people upset thing is because people got upset at him for fucking playing the game normally
has shitloads of alt accounts and ckeys, hasnt played in awhile, can probably be proven via the DB
I like how 3 people who have no linked ckey/don't play anymore/havent played since 2015 just show up out of the blue to defend their butt buddy from 2015 with the amazingly deep and complex reasoning of "ur just salty he's better then u ;)"
also yes it will show if you connect the next few days just to go "well i have actually been playing!!1!" we can still check the times you played before that
Dante probably told them to show up and start spouting this crap because he realized that he himself can't argue or debate out of the evidence I dropped. See: how they're trying to dismiss the Patreon's existence and the Rule 1/7 Violations and switch the topic to "ur just salty he's better than you".
Also, you still need to answer this post by Bob Dobbington, and your friends can't do that for you:
Bob Dobbington wrote:Alright, so goof just made a very convincing case that the rules you actually violated are rules 1&7, which are (briefly) don't be a dick and don't toe the line, respectively. You have a Patreon where you literally accept money for the stated purpose of violating rule 1, and you're on record in your previous appeal as willfully violating rule 7. What has changed such that we can be confident that, if unbanned, you would comply with rules 1&7?