oranges should not be a maintainer

An old fashioned device, relics of a forgotten era.

"If I ever meet myself, I'll hit myself so hard I won't know what's hit me."
Locked
User avatar
oranges
Code Maintainer
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
Byond Username: Optimumtact
Github Username: optimumtact
Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by oranges » #347669

Bottom post of the previous page:

Super Aggro Crag wrote:If appealing to oldfaggotry is the true determinator of code maintainer rights then me and ice packs should be codekings
you have to be old and a humongous gay
User avatar
Super Aggro Crag
In Game PermaBanned
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:47 pm
Byond Username: Super Aggro Crag

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Super Aggro Crag » #347681

Oh im a humongous straight guess im disqualified
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Shezza
Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 6:54 pm
Byond Username: Wilchen
Location: rent free
Contact:

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Shezza » #347696

Qbopper wrote:Image

>is trying to play the oldfag game
Thats the forum account, qpopsicles
Thanks for all the dopamine.

You (cough), you haven't won here. You and your mutie-bastard friends are gonna join me in a big ol' mushroom cloud sendoff. I just triggered the self-destruct. (Heh, heh; cough, cough,...) The work will go on. You didn't do nothing here, 'cept seal your own death warrants. Duty, (cough) honor... courage... Semper Fiiiii........
User avatar
Super Aggro Crag
In Game PermaBanned
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:47 pm
Byond Username: Super Aggro Crag

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Super Aggro Crag » #347701

You know your byond username is linked to your forum account right shezza we can all see how long you made your account
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Steelpoint
Github User
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:37 pm
Byond Username: Steelpoint
Github Username: Steelpoint
Location: The Armoury

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Steelpoint » #347757

Really? My account was made in 2011 yet it does not display that on my profile here.

Irrespective I thought minor abuse of power was a given for maintainers?

Even if you want to change it that's a coderbus issue, not an administrative issue.
Image
Slignerd
Github User
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 2:27 pm
Byond Username: Slignerd
Github Username: Slignerd

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Slignerd » #347819

Shezza wrote:Thats the forum account, qpopsicles
Your forum account is still indicative of when you decided to start participating in the community, and your byond account was made much later than mine, so there's that. :roll:

I know you love sucking oranges off when you're not doing your shitstirring routine, but come on now.
It would appear that I'm a high RP weeb who hates roleplay and anime.
User avatar
Qbopper
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:34 pm
Byond Username: Qbopper
Github Username: Qbopper
Location: Canada

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Qbopper » #347997

Shezza wrote:
Qbopper wrote:Image

>is trying to play the oldfag game
Thats the forum account, qpopsicles
Image

>is trying to play the oldfag game

edit: also oranges closed my pr twice like a big meanie
Limey wrote:its too late.
User avatar
Screemonster
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:23 pm
Byond Username: Scree

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Screemonster » #348009

Super Aggro Crag wrote:We had a giantess thread on /tg/ yesterday. And there's a thread about fat asses right now on /tg/ and some guy kibked the archived post from 6 years ago where /tg/'s fetishmongers created an order of monstrously obese paladinesses who launch themselves out of catapults at wizard towers. I made like 37 posts in that very thread
I remember a thread a year or so ago on /tg/ that was trying to make a setting out of the big titty sorceress from dragon's crown and it led onto the idea of titties being some measure of power and from there it progressed into sorceresses stealing the titty size of defeated enemies and finally like evil sorceresses stuffing entire people/acolytes in there and fucking absorbing them into more titty or some shit and then finally someone dared to ask "fellas, is this... vore?"

so yeah let's not pretend /tg/ was ever not a magical realm
User avatar
Rustledjimm
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:07 pm
Byond Username: Rustledjimm

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Rustledjimm » #348015

So wait does that mean I get more of a say than most of you faggots considering this was my original ckey?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
So uhh, I'm an admin. Please leave feedback! Oops took me a while to strike that through.

Will Baker
Suzu Suzaku
TBC
Spoiler:
Image
Personal Ban Length Record: 2.1024e+006 minutes
Slignerd
Github User
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 2:27 pm
Byond Username: Slignerd
Github Username: Slignerd

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Slignerd » #348018

Rustledjimm wrote:So wait does that mean I get more of a say than most of you faggots considering this was my original ckey?
Nah, it's just Shezza being mentally challenged.
It would appear that I'm a high RP weeb who hates roleplay and anime.
User avatar
Qbopper
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:34 pm
Byond Username: Qbopper
Github Username: Qbopper
Location: Canada

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Qbopper » #348021

Sligneris wrote:
Rustledjimm wrote:So wait does that mean I get more of a say than most of you faggots considering this was my original ckey?
Nah, it's just Shezza being mentally challenged.
^

if you're using account age in an argument you're a brainlet
Limey wrote:its too late.
User avatar
AnonymousNow
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:41 pm
Byond Username: AnonymousNow
Location: Neptune

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by AnonymousNow » #348028

I'll be the old humongous gay, then, and say that a maintainer fiddling affairs they shouldn't because of the nature of their official involvement is poor form.
Hornygranny wrote:It's not your codebase. It's our codebase. You can imply soft power as much as you want, but you don't have it. Division between the server and project is absolute. I'm not interested in reading dezzmont platitudes for the billionth time and won't be checking back in this thread.
Image

Image
Spoiler:
~Simplified for the sake of Wyzack's delicate feelings~
Fuck anti-roleplay suggestions and fuck Bay.

Xenomorphs a shit.
User avatar
captain sawrge
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:13 pm
Byond Username: Sawrge

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by captain sawrge » #348029

AnonymousNow wrote:I'll be the old humongous gay, then, and say that a maintainer fiddling affairs they shouldn't because of the nature of their official involvement is poor form.
your*
Image
User avatar
Shezza
Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 6:54 pm
Byond Username: Wilchen
Location: rent free
Contact:

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Shezza » #348227

haha they took the bait





how can a person who took such obvious bait be reasonable about coderbus stuff
Thanks for all the dopamine.

You (cough), you haven't won here. You and your mutie-bastard friends are gonna join me in a big ol' mushroom cloud sendoff. I just triggered the self-destruct. (Heh, heh; cough, cough,...) The work will go on. You didn't do nothing here, 'cept seal your own death warrants. Duty, (cough) honor... courage... Semper Fiiiii........
User avatar
Aloraydrel
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 4:14 pm
Byond Username: Aloraydrel
Github Username: Aloraydrel

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Aloraydrel » #348232

Merely an act
User avatar
Screemonster
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:23 pm
Byond Username: Scree

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Screemonster » #348240

CosmicScientist wrote:
Screemonster wrote:snoip
I remember a thread a year or so ago on /tg/ that was trying to make a setting out of the big titty sorceress from dragon's crown and it led onto the idea of titties being some measure of power and from there it progressed into sorceresses stealing the titty size of defeated enemies and finally like evil sorceresses stuffing entire people/acolytes in there and fucking absorbing them into more titty or some shit and then finally someone dared to ask "fellas, is this... vore?"

so yeah let's not pretend /tg/ was ever not a magical realm
Isn't that an anime and also a reason why anime is bad?
I have no idea I just googled "sorceress with tits" and dragon's crown came up as a result, I dunno if it's an anime or a game
Slignerd
Github User
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 2:27 pm
Byond Username: Slignerd
Github Username: Slignerd

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Slignerd » #348241

Shezza wrote:[snip]
Opinion discarded tbh
It would appear that I'm a high RP weeb who hates roleplay and anime.
User avatar
captain sawrge
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:13 pm
Byond Username: Sawrge

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by captain sawrge » #348272

Dragon's Crown is a vanillaware game you fucking retards
Image
User avatar
D&B
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:23 am
Byond Username: Repukan
Location: *teleports behind you*

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by D&B » #348281

I think they were talking about Seikon no Qwaiser or so.
Spoiler:
[20:26:02]ADMIN: PM: [censored admin]->[censored]: Welp. It was just a prank bro isn't a very good excuse when it comes to unprovoked nonantag murder, but since this is your first time doing it and you seem to understand the problem instead of a bannu I'm just going to leave you with a warning. Please PLEASE don't do this again in the future, as funny as crackhead broken bottle memes can be. Alrighty? Do you have any input on this?
[20:26:39]ADMIN: PM: [censored]->[censored admin]: Alright, no problem. I have some input. Fuck my boy pussy.
[20:27:06]ADMIN: PM: [censored admin]->[censored]: Okay then. Have fun.
[20:31:29]ADMIN: PM: [censored admin]->[censored]: Excuse me?
J_Madison wrote: that's a stupid fucking stat
you don't play, you've never played
lying little shit with your bullshit stat
fuck you
ColonicAcid wrote:and with enough practise i too could blow my own dick so well that only the gods know how it feels.
User avatar
Deitus
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 5:26 pm
Byond Username: Deitus

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Deitus » #348295

i may not agree with everything oranges does but if you dont think that all coders pursue both their own personal agendas / their circlejerk agendas, you have another thing coming. i wont say all, but the VAST majority of coders do not have the community's best interest in mind. im not saying this as some "OMG CONSPIRACY" crap, im saying it as a fact that i've reluctantly accepted as a dark spot on a server i otherwise love.

if he's trying to get rid of catpeople though, then he has my full support.

catpeople were a massive fucking mistake. from what i can gather they were a joke addition that people memed hard enough to turn serious, and now we're stuck with them. i personally dont care if catpeople play fucking normally but the minute you start pulling any "purr nyan nyan :3 pomf!" shit either ironically or unironically, you will be beaten and thrown down disposals just as fast as a lizard trying to erp.

its not funny. its creepy, unnecessary, and brings the entire server down by it's addition, let alone the retarded behavior some players show with them.
Image
User avatar
iamgoofball
Github User
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:50 pm
Byond Username: Iamgoofball
Github Username: Iamgoofball

Re: oranges should not be be a maintainer

Post by iamgoofball » #348296

Sligneris wrote:
bman wrote:Slig, where were you calling for a maintainer's removal when Joan admitted to using their own maintainer rank to ruin the reputation of PRs they don't like + abuse their powers ingame?
Irrelevant to this thread. If it's something you're concerned about, feel free to start a separate thread, and then I'll draw my conclusions from there. I'm sorry, but I'm not all-knowing, and I don't have eyes everywhere.

All you're doing now is deflecting, first onto me, and now onto Joan - if you're empty-handed when it comes to oranges, then feel free not to post at all.
This isn't irrelevant, why is this a problem when oranges does it but not when Joan does it?
User avatar
cedarbridge
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
Byond Username: Cedarbridge

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by cedarbridge » #348302

Deitus wrote:its not funny. its creepy, unnecessary, and brings the entire server down by it's addition
I keep reading this sentence and easily forgetting he's talking about somebody's sprite he doesn't like.
User avatar
Lazengann
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:26 pm
Byond Username: Lazengann

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Lazengann » #348303

That's like saying in game rape is just text you don't like
User avatar
iamgoofball
Github User
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:50 pm
Byond Username: Iamgoofball
Github Username: Iamgoofball

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by iamgoofball » #348306

Lazengann wrote:That's like saying in game rape is just text you don't like
Slignerd
Github User
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 2:27 pm
Byond Username: Slignerd
Github Username: Slignerd

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Slignerd » #348307

Lazengann wrote:That's like saying in game rape is just text you don't like
Did you really just compare a pair of cat ears on someone's head to rape?
It would appear that I'm a high RP weeb who hates roleplay and anime.
User avatar
Lazengann
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:26 pm
Byond Username: Lazengann

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Lazengann » #348308

No, just cedar's argument
User avatar
cedarbridge
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
Byond Username: Cedarbridge

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by cedarbridge » #348309

Lazengann wrote:That's like saying in game rape is just text you don't like
Its like a lot of things, but it only means what you said with a healthy dose of confirmation bias. I can easily apply what I quoted to a laundry list of things I subjectively dislike. The fact that you guys have some sort of moral puritan streak going is really just embarrassing.
User avatar
Lazengann
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:26 pm
Byond Username: Lazengann

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Lazengann » #348314

That's what I'm getting at, eliminating all context is a debate tactic for idiots.
User avatar
captain sawrge
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:13 pm
Byond Username: Sawrge

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by captain sawrge » #348318

Deitus wrote: its not funny. its creepy, unnecessary, and brings the entire server down by it's addition, let alone the retarded behavior some players show with them.
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Last edited by captain sawrge on Wed Oct 18, 2017 9:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Image
User avatar
captain sawrge
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:13 pm
Byond Username: Sawrge

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by captain sawrge » #348319

I'm very sorry Deitus, you have prostate cancer.

It;s terminal.
Image
User avatar
captain sawrge
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:13 pm
Byond Username: Sawrge

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by captain sawrge » #348321

Really though wouldn't it just be such a fucking absolute travesty if we kept pushing this weeb cat bullshit and players like deitus left the server?
Image
onleavedontatme
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 10:26 pm
Byond Username: KorPhaeron

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by onleavedontatme » #348323

Will Deitus ever recover?
User avatar
captain sawrge
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:13 pm
Byond Username: Sawrge

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by captain sawrge » #348325

Kor wrote:Will Deitus ever recover?
No because it's a post-and-run and I'm extremely owned for writing 3 replies that will not be read
Image
onleavedontatme
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 10:26 pm
Byond Username: KorPhaeron

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by onleavedontatme » #348328

I'm gonna add a new forum rule that you will be locked in the shed until you reply after attempting a post and run attack
User avatar
Deitus
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 5:26 pm
Byond Username: Deitus

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Deitus » #348338

cedarbridge wrote:
Deitus wrote:its not funny. its creepy, unnecessary, and brings the entire server down by it's addition
I keep reading this sentence and easily forgetting he's talking about somebody's sprite he doesn't like.
reread the post and try again. reading comprehension is a difficult concept, apparently.
captain sawrge wrote:
Kor wrote:Will Deitus ever recover?
No because it's a post-and-run and I'm extremely owned for writing 3 replies that will not be read
so if i dont stay and watch for replies to immediately have answers to any arguments im posting and running? jesus dude i dont keep these threads as a tab open and refresh them constantly.

also, oh boy its another "deitus is a shitter lets ad hominem him by bringing up notes that have nothing to do with the topic at hand!" episode. featuring captain "i hate deitus fnr" sawrge, no less.
before we change the channel lets go ahead and dissect/give some backstory to the notes in order.

note one: it was a captain meme that i had seen done before and found funny, then when i did it it suddenly became horrible and rapey so we must ban this man. admins tend to be a bit selective with rule enforcements, i find.

note two/three/four: this was the ever-triggered kevinz making up rules on the spot. the reason he gave that i shouldnt be saying that meme (which, by the way: DEAR GOD, MEMES ON /TG/?! CLEARLY banworthy) is because, and i QUOTE, "heads of staff should act mature." if this is something admins enforced im pretty sure this would exclude just about any player that tried a head role.

note five: ooc was asking what the most disgusting kind of porn you could think of was. this was a meme ban, hence the one minute.

note 6: reposting of an earlier note for some reason.

note 7: im not sure why this is even a ban, much less a CAPTAIN ban, considering when the incident occurred i was 1) CE and 2) an antag.

note 8: i did this once, and was then banned. no warning. cross station spam is always just NTR hut lite anyway.

note 9: this was a meme i did as librarian if i remember right, the only reason i was banned instead of admins just waiting for me to be lynched was because it lagged for some people.

again, i really dont understand why admins constantly bring up my note history whenever i have an opinion i dont like, and i especially dont understand why sawrge for some reason has an intense and burning hatred for me. but what i dont understand most of all is why the fuck any of that matters when it is entirely off topic.

im gonna close the tab now for a few minutes, hopefully this wont be a "post and run" if i dont immediately reply.
Image
User avatar
captain sawrge
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:13 pm
Byond Username: Sawrge

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by captain sawrge » #348340

You were crying about "nya" being creepy and disturbing and detracting from the overall experience. Constantly spamming erotica, trying to force other players into acting in a suggestive manner, and repeating suggestive things seems plenty relevant.

Also, memes in-character are also pretty jarring and immersion breaking, IMO.
Image
User avatar
cedarbridge
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
Byond Username: Cedarbridge

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by cedarbridge » #348343

Remember, if you thought it was funny but it wasn't just say its a meme and you're good to go. :ok_hand:
User avatar
captain sawrge
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:13 pm
Byond Username: Sawrge

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by captain sawrge » #348346

Deitus you're really hung up on how I seem to have this irrational and biased hatred for you but my opinion of you is pretty much based entirely on your posts on the forums and in discord so I don't know maybe you're actually a very friendly and excellent person in-game but everywhere else you are a shitty weepy baby and your admin remarks seem to really heavily suggest that maybe, just maybe, you're no better on the server.

Help me out here man what do I base my opinons of people on if not for the way they act, the things they say, and the general impression they give?
Image
User avatar
1g88a
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 6:19 pm
Byond Username: Ig88A

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by 1g88a » #348357

Cat people don't bother me because it seemed to be that before they were added there were already plenty of people going out of their way to get the catears item anyways. That's my opinion, you're welcome.
DEAD: ADMIN(Hornygranny) says, "you play in my universe, normie"
User avatar
iamgoofball
Github User
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:50 pm
Byond Username: Iamgoofball
Github Username: Iamgoofball

Re: oranges should not be be a maintainer

Post by iamgoofball » #348359

iamgoofball wrote:
Sligneris wrote:
bman wrote:Slig, where were you calling for a maintainer's removal when Joan admitted to using their own maintainer rank to ruin the reputation of PRs they don't like + abuse their powers ingame?
Irrelevant to this thread. If it's something you're concerned about, feel free to start a separate thread, and then I'll draw my conclusions from there. I'm sorry, but I'm not all-knowing, and I don't have eyes everywhere.

All you're doing now is deflecting, first onto me, and now onto Joan - if you're empty-handed when it comes to oranges, then feel free not to post at all.
This isn't irrelevant, why is this a problem when oranges does it but not when Joan does it?
User avatar
Deitus
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 5:26 pm
Byond Username: Deitus

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Deitus » #348362

captain sawrge wrote:You were crying about "nya" being creepy and disturbing and detracting from the overall experience. Constantly spamming erotica, trying to force other players into acting in a suggestive manner, and repeating suggestive things seems plenty relevant.

Also, memes in-character are also pretty jarring and immersion breaking, IMO.
>constantly
once.
>force others
thats what ai laws do.
>repeating suggestive themes
on an 18+ server? heaven forbid.
>memes on /tg/
memes are literally part of the server, and immersion is one of them.
cedarbridge wrote:Remember, if you thought it was funny but it wasn't just say its a meme and you're good to go. :ok_hand:
again, please work on reading comprehension before posting.
captain sawrge wrote:Deitus you're really hung up on how I seem to have this irrational and biased hatred for you but my opinion of you is pretty much based entirely on your posts on the forums and in discord so I don't know maybe you're actually a very friendly and excellent person in-game but everywhere else you are a shitty weepy baby and your admin remarks seem to really heavily suggest that maybe, just maybe, you're no better on the server.

Help me out here man what do I base my opinons of people on if not for the way they act, the things they say, and the general impression they give?
i remember recently armhulenn was speaking to me about possibly being a canidate and you immediately replied that i shouldn't, with the reasoning being "he said the admins dont like him."
or, to rephrase
"i dont like deitus because he says i dont like him."
i really dont get why you find me whiny, and for as long as i can remember ever interacting with you, you've shown a generalized antagonistic and hostile attitude towards me. i talk to others about you too and they say you're a nice and chill guy, but i guess this street goes both ways: if you dont dislike me, why are you always so eager to call me out for no apparent reason?

but again: can we please go back to the topic at hand? this whole thing started with me giving my personal feedback on the original post/topic but suddenly we're posting notes and my history instead.

ad ho·mi·nem
ˌad ˈhämənəm
adverb & adjective
1.
(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.

this might be a lot to ask, but can we actually have a mature discussion about the original topic without using logical fallacies like middle-schoolers?
Image
User avatar
captain sawrge
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:13 pm
Byond Username: Sawrge

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by captain sawrge » #348365

I don't think there's any intelligent discussion to be had if somehow "nya" is creepy and disgusting and detracts from the experience but spamming memes and porn over the radio and sexy AI laws is just server culture.

Image
Image
User avatar
Deitus
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 5:26 pm
Byond Username: Deitus

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Deitus » #348370

captain sawrge wrote:I don't think there's any intelligent discussion to be had if somehow "nya" is creepy and disgusting and detracts from the experience but spamming memes and porn over the radio and sexy AI laws is just server culture.]
good, now we're back on topic. though i never said it was disgusting, allow me to retract and rephrase my statement that it was "creepy" to that it is "annoying." as i previously said before the thread went off-topic. i really dont mind catpeople any more than the regular player, and dont particularly care much if they stay, but when they start doing the "nyaa pomf :3 *pets pets* purr" shit, they will be beaten and thrown down the nearest disposals bin. if they understand and accept that risk, then i see no problem.

also, memes and wgw over radio is literally and unironically a part of server culture. its been there since before i came here, and its probably going to keep going long after i leave (hopefully in the distant future). this was discussed in the "pile on ick-ook" thread.

as for the sexy ai laws, i would again ask that you please take the time to read and comprehend posts before replying to them.
Image
User avatar
Lazengann
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:26 pm
Byond Username: Lazengann

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Lazengann » #348373

Being excessively anime has also been server culture
User avatar
iamgoofball
Github User
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:50 pm
Byond Username: Iamgoofball
Github Username: Iamgoofball

Re: oranges should not be be a maintainer

Post by iamgoofball » #348381

iamgoofball wrote:
iamgoofball wrote:
Sligneris wrote:
bman wrote:Slig, where were you calling for a maintainer's removal when Joan admitted to using their own maintainer rank to ruin the reputation of PRs they don't like + abuse their powers ingame?
Irrelevant to this thread. If it's something you're concerned about, feel free to start a separate thread, and then I'll draw my conclusions from there. I'm sorry, but I'm not all-knowing, and I don't have eyes everywhere.

All you're doing now is deflecting, first onto me, and now onto Joan - if you're empty-handed when it comes to oranges, then feel free not to post at all.
This isn't irrelevant, why is this a problem when oranges does it but not when Joan does it?
Slignerd
Github User
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 2:27 pm
Byond Username: Slignerd
Github Username: Slignerd

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by Slignerd » #348384

It's irrelevant because this thread is about oranges' behavior, both recent and long-term. That doesn't mean that other matters are "not a problem", it just means that they should be discussed in another thread.
It would appear that I'm a high RP weeb who hates roleplay and anime.
lzimann
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 5:13 am
Byond Username: Lzimann
Github Username: lzimann

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by lzimann » #348385

talk with kor, literally no one else can do anything about it
User avatar
iamgoofball
Github User
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:50 pm
Byond Username: Iamgoofball
Github Username: Iamgoofball

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by iamgoofball » #348391

Sligneris wrote:It's irrelevant because this thread is about oranges' behavior, both recent and long-term. That doesn't mean that other matters are "not a problem", it just means that they should be discussed in another thread.
Ricegum, contradictions in what you see as abuse in a thread where you're whining about abuse isn't irrelevant.
onleavedontatme
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 10:26 pm
Byond Username: KorPhaeron

Re: oranges should not be be a maintainer

Post by onleavedontatme » #348420

iamgoofball wrote:
Sligneris wrote:
bman wrote:Slig, where were you calling for a maintainer's removal when Joan admitted to using their own maintainer rank to ruin the reputation of PRs they don't like + abuse their powers ingame?
Irrelevant to this thread. If it's something you're concerned about, feel free to start a separate thread, and then I'll draw my conclusions from there. I'm sorry, but I'm not all-knowing, and I don't have eyes everywhere.

All you're doing now is deflecting, first onto me, and now onto Joan - if you're empty-handed when it comes to oranges, then feel free not to post at all.
This isn't irrelevant, why is this a problem when oranges does it but not when Joan does it?
Kor wrote:
bman wrote:Slig, where were you calling for a maintainer's removal when Joan admitted to using their own maintainer rank to ruin the reputation of PRs they don't like + abuse their powers ingame?
Image

Slig not only said they wanted Joan gone they said it directly in conversation to you

Why do you make bad posts bman?

I like oranges but please post with honour even when defending him
???
onleavedontatme
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 10:26 pm
Byond Username: KorPhaeron

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by onleavedontatme » #348421

Why was this made outside the shed
User avatar
cedarbridge
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
Byond Username: Cedarbridge

Re: oranges should not be a maintainer

Post by cedarbridge » #348429

Serious posting obviously.
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users