Yet another Drone Policy thread

Ask and discuss policy about game conduct and rules.

Moderator: In-Game Head Admins

User avatar
Doctor Pork
 
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 7:31 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Byond Username: Doctor_Pork

Re: Yet another Drone Policy thread

Unread postby Doctor Pork » Sat Aug 11, 2018 6:18 pm #432461

Saegrimr wrote:
Cobby wrote:Because antag is a coveted role and interfering with it is blasphemy, even if not directly interfering.

They have the same stipulation on /vg/ and are even more powerful in general, hell you even emag mommis to make them work for you if you can catch one of them.

It's a fucking mystery.
oranges wrote:pork, the nondescript, commoner king, literally so stealth you could just your normal name in OOC and nobody would know, long may he reign as the secret commander

Image
Deitus wrote:If your signature is scrollable it's too long and fucking obnoxious and you should feel bad

Image
Link to my feedback thread. Go there.
PKPenguin321 wrote:I've been had by yet another tg boondoggle



User avatar
WarbossLincoln
 
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:14 pm
Byond Username: WarbossLincoln

Re: Yet another Drone Policy thread

Unread postby WarbossLincoln » Mon Aug 13, 2018 5:38 pm #432828

I would be cool with drones being brought back and having their laws loosened a bit. Let them interact with the round to some extent. But then make them more expensive to produce. Require something other than just metal/glass so there won't be a massive supply of them. Also the idea of only allowing you to have 1 drone life would be cool. If someone can spawn as a drone 10 times its silly.
--Crocodillo

somerandomguy
 
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2017 7:41 pm
Byond Username: Astatineguy12

Re: Yet another Drone Policy thread

Unread postby somerandomguy » Tue Aug 14, 2018 3:36 am #432919

Lower drone health a lot and reorder the laws so it's 2,3,1, completely removing the confusion from their laws while also making it easy for someone (read: an antag) to keep a drone from fixing their sabotage. Or nix the laws completely and make it clear you're supposed to primarily follow the flavortext and not the fluff laws. If the problem is still that the laws are contradictory, this will remove the conflict completely.

User avatar
Denton
Github User
 
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 3:53 pm
Byond Username: Denton-30
Github Username: 81Denton

Re: Yet another Drone Policy thread

Unread postby Denton » Tue Aug 14, 2018 8:41 am #432952

Does anything speak against me adding a bunch of materials to the Derelict now that it's the designated drone gulag?

User avatar
DemonFiren
 
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 9:15 pm
Byond Username: DemonFiren

Re: Yet another Drone Policy thread

Unread postby DemonFiren » Tue Aug 14, 2018 11:59 am #432968

yes, drones aren't allowed to have fun
Image
Image
Image
ImageImageImageImageImage

non-lizard things:
Spoiler:
Image

User avatar
Cobby
 
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone

Re: Yet another Drone Policy thread

Unread postby Cobby » Wed Aug 15, 2018 11:08 pm #433165

Denton wrote:Does anything speak against me adding a bunch of materials to the Derelict now that it's the designated drone gulag?


I was going to do that and never did so if you'd do it I'd greatly appreciate it
purple man bad

Previous

Return to Policy Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Gun Hog, penterwast, Shadowflame909 and 2 guests