Moderators: In-Game Game Master, In-Game Head Admins
We are banning ERP and sexual content on a trial basis.
OrbisA wrote:Ian
tedward1337 wrote:Sae is like the racist grandad who everyone laughs at for being racist, but deep down we all know he's right.
tedward1337 wrote:Sae is like the racist grandad who everyone laughs at for being racist, but deep down we all know he's right.
Vekter wrote:I still believe Ian the Safe Sex Corgi is the best way to deal with ERP, and will likely continue to spread his word of condoms.
I'm so happy a major form of RP that creates interesting situations and generally doesn't affect me at all has been banned!
most people enjoy waiting for the admins/crew to fuck with them in some capacity
OrbisA wrote:You habe been banned by : HornyGranny.
Reason: Introduced sexual themes into the game.
banned by : HornyGranny.
HornyGranny.
tusterman11 wrote:Can you stop lying? I just asked you and you are was a piece of shiit on me!!!
Kor wrote:I wish Wyzack was still an admin.
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
tusterman11 wrote:Can you stop lying? I just asked you and you are was a piece of shiit on me!!!
Kor wrote:I wish Wyzack was still an admin.
Steelpoint wrote:I think more so that so long as the ERP is consensual and in context, as well as built up and moderate, it should be fine.
Now if we are talking about two characters that jut bolt to the dorms at round start and start humping, then start sending in the clowns.
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
Saintish wrote:Saegrimr's dealt the first ERP ban. You see, he handled it fine when he spawned hostile clowns on us. Making it bannable is unnecessary
tusterman11 wrote:Can you stop lying? I just asked you and you are was a piece of shiit on me!!!
Kor wrote:I wish Wyzack was still an admin.
Wyzack wrote:I have a question. If someone gets banned under this rule, and the rule is later repealed for being awful, would they be unbanned?
Ikarrus wrote:Yes. They would just need to appeal it to bring it to our attention.
tedward1337 wrote:Sae is like the racist grandad who everyone laughs at for being racist, but deep down we all know he's right.
OrbisA wrote:The rule is still very vague, we can't follow a rule that's so open to interpretations, that's the question I first made in my post and wasn't still not answered (aside from the this is not a ban, only a warning)
tedward1337 wrote:Sae is like the racist grandad who everyone laughs at for being racist, but deep down we all know he's right.
Saegrimr wrote:Honestly if you continue to do it despite knowing the rules and being warned, it doesn't really matter what the rule is, you've already proven that you don't care for the rules and will continue to break them anyway.
bandit wrote:No, it just proves that you don't care for that particular rule.
tedward1337 wrote:Sae is like the racist grandad who everyone laughs at for being racist, but deep down we all know he's right.