[armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Appeals which have been closed.

Moderators: In-Game Head Admins, In-Game Admin, In-Game Game Master

User avatar
technokek
 
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
Byond Username: Technokek

[armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby technokek » Thu Jan 07, 2021 7:11 am #586577

BYOND account: Techno#7612
Ban type: Discord
Ban length: Permanent
Ban reason: Image
Time ban was placed: 07.01.2021
Server you were playing on when banned: Discord
Round ID in which ban was placed: This is retarded how am i a "creep"
Why you think you should be unbanned: I said i dont watch anime so i dont care about lolies, i cant belive we are are actually having this discussion



User avatar
Armhulen
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
Byond Username: Armhulenn
Github Username: bazelart

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby Armhulen » Thu Jan 07, 2021 7:39 am #586581

I wanna say that I used that as an example and you are more generally a creep:

armhulenToday at 4:57 PM
i should say that this isn't from that one discussion but just how techno has always been and i think no person should be a vocal supporter of that content
for any reason.

If headmins wanna let him back into the discord, i guess. but there is no more unenjoyable environment for new people than to come into the discord and see the pedophile devil's advocate
Image

User avatar
technokek
 
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
Byond Username: Technokek

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby technokek » Thu Jan 07, 2021 7:56 am #586585

Armhulen wrote:I wanna say that I used that as an example and you are more generally a creep:

armhulenToday at 4:57 PM
i should say that this isn't from that one discussion but just how techno has always been and i think no person should be a vocal supporter of that content
for any reason.

If headmins wanna let him back into the discord, i guess. but there is no more unenjoyable environment for new people than to come into the discord and see the pedophile devil's advocate



First of all thank you for your quick response.

I have never endorsed loli or pedophilic contend, I simply stated in the daily discuss in politics that where going on for quite some time one the topic of loli that :

1. I don't not watch anime or the porn form
2. I don't think actual pedophilia should be connected to drawings since it is is dishonest to actually victims of pedophilia.
3. I gave examples of how Amazon is selling practically nude depictions of anime girls, because someone wouldn't belive me that they where selling it.
4. That loli is from my understanding just the definition of a underage character and not directly related to pornographic contend.

I have never endorsed the usage of "lolis" in pornographic material.

I simply don't care as I have been to a very cool catholic school in germany "AKO" with multiple priest that ACTUALLY made sexual advances on children.

Again I have never advocated for the use of underage anime characters in pornographic material.

I simply couldn't care less if some guy in Indonesia draws some dumb cartoons. <-- Cartoon not porn.

Thanks for making me google all this garbage

User avatar
technokek
 
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
Byond Username: Technokek

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby technokek » Thu Jan 07, 2021 8:12 am #586586

Addendum: I would fully understand if you banned me for saying stuff like "I wanna jack off to those underage anime girls" or something similar, but I do not recall ever doing that and since I am banned I can neither verify I didn't say it or delete any evidence of me saying it. Again I do not endorse pornographic use of underage characters, but banning the general use of a underage character in a PG13 cartoon is kinda dumb in my epic opinion.

Like would you ban child actors too?

Again I don't not endorse the pornographic use of children in any form nor have I ever done that.

User avatar
technokek
 
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
Byond Username: Technokek

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby technokek » Thu Jan 07, 2021 8:19 am #586587

I genuinely believe this is a misunderstanding. I think you came to the conclusion that I actually support sexualization of under children. This is simply not the case. From what I understand the term loli does not describe a sexual depiction of a character it only refers to its age and gender. I didn't want to make another comment on my own thread. Did you see me advocating for the sexual use or these characters on discord? Because that does not reflect my opinion

User avatar
technokek
 
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
Byond Username: Technokek

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby technokek » Thu Jan 07, 2021 9:16 am #586597

hello i am now continuing this monologue.

Image

is me litterally saying
technokek wrote:I wanna jack off to those underage anime girls


this is not a epic thing to post but, this is the only message in 14,425 other post that can be even closely be interpreted as me being "creepy".

kinda cringe to ban me for a obvious joke.

Anyway dont mind this:

Image

Image

Image

yes there is more... no i will not post it.

User avatar
Stickymayhem
In-Game Admin
 
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:13 pm
Byond Username: Stickymayhem

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby Stickymayhem » Thu Jan 07, 2021 10:03 am #586604

technokek wrote:hello i am now continuing this monologue.

Image

is me litterally saying
technokek wrote:I wanna jack off to those underage anime girls


this is not a epic thing to post but, this is the only message in 14,425 other post that can be even closely be interpreted as me being "creepy".

kinda cringe to ban me for a obvious joke.

Anyway dont mind this:

Image

Image

Image

yes there is more... no i will not post it.


I've been invoked so I guess I have to reply with context.

Loli is fucking disgusting but the data is unfortunately against common decency on this one.

I stand by those posts and will back the research to my own optical detriment.

That last post is out of context, and referring to someone who said something along the lines of all loli being harmful to real children, and I clarified that not all loli is traced from real cp.

Posting lolis in the discord is cringe and should get you dumpstered every time.
Image

Image

Boris wrote:Sticky is a jackass who has worms where his brain should be, but he also gets exactly what SS13 should be

User avatar
technokek
 
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
Byond Username: Technokek

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby technokek » Thu Jan 07, 2021 10:08 am #586605

Stickymayhem wrote:
technokek wrote:hello i am now continuing this monologue.

Image

is me litterally saying
technokek wrote:I wanna jack off to those underage anime girls


this is not a epic thing to post but, this is the only message in 14,425 other post that can be even closely be interpreted as me being "creepy".

kinda cringe to ban me for a obvious joke.

Anyway dont mind this:

Image

Image

Image

yes there is more... no i will not post it.


I've been invoked so I guess I have to reply with context.

Loli is fucking disgusting but the data is unfortunately against common decency on this one.

I stand by those posts and will back the research to my own optical detriment.

That last post is out of context, and referring to someone who said something along the lines of all loli being harmful to real children, and I clarified that not all loli is traced from real cp.

Posting lolis in the discord is cringe and should get you dumpstered every time.


i never posted loli on the discord, i linked to a amazon (i made sure to break the link apart to preven embedding) listing on the discord, no actual loli pictures where posted by me. I used you since your post out of context look bad too and exactly that is beeing used against me.

User avatar
Stickymayhem
In-Game Admin
 
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:13 pm
Byond Username: Stickymayhem

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby Stickymayhem » Thu Jan 07, 2021 10:28 am #586609

technokek wrote:
Stickymayhem wrote:
technokek wrote:hello i am now continuing this monologue.

Image

is me litterally saying
technokek wrote:I wanna jack off to those underage anime girls


this is not a epic thing to post but, this is the only message in 14,425 other post that can be even closely be interpreted as me being "creepy".

kinda cringe to ban me for a obvious joke.

Anyway dont mind this:

Image

Image

Image

yes there is more... no i will not post it.


I've been invoked so I guess I have to reply with context.

Loli is fucking disgusting but the data is unfortunately against common decency on this one.

I stand by those posts and will back the research to my own optical detriment.

That last post is out of context, and referring to someone who said something along the lines of all loli being harmful to real children, and I clarified that not all loli is traced from real cp.

Posting lolis in the discord is cringe and should get you dumpstered every time.


i never posted loli on the discord, i linked to a amazon (i made sure to break the link apart to preven embedding) listing on the discord, no actual loli pictures where posted by me. I used you since your post out of context look bad too and exactly that is beeing used against me.


I never said I wanted to bang lolis so let's keep some distinctions between us yeah bud
Image

Image

Boris wrote:Sticky is a jackass who has worms where his brain should be, but he also gets exactly what SS13 should be

User avatar
technokek
 
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
Byond Username: Technokek

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby technokek » Thu Jan 07, 2021 10:35 am #586610

Stickymayhem wrote:
technokek wrote:
Stickymayhem wrote:
technokek wrote:hello i am now continuing this monologue.

Image

is me litterally saying
technokek wrote:I wanna jack off to those underage anime girls


this is not a epic thing to post but, this is the only message in 14,425 other post that can be even closely be interpreted as me being "creepy".

kinda cringe to ban me for a obvious joke.

Anyway dont mind this:

Image

Image

Image

yes there is more... no i will not post it.


I've been invoked so I guess I have to reply with context.

Loli is fucking disgusting but the data is unfortunately against common decency on this one.

I stand by those posts and will back the research to my own optical detriment.

That last post is out of context, and referring to someone who said something along the lines of all loli being harmful to real children, and I clarified that not all loli is traced from real cp.

Posting lolis in the discord is cringe and should get you dumpstered every time.


i never posted loli on the discord, i linked to a amazon (i made sure to break the link apart to preven embedding) listing on the discord, no actual loli pictures where posted by me. I used you since your post out of context look bad too and exactly that is beeing used against me.


I never said I wanted to bang lolis so let's keep some distinctions between us yeah bud


its litterally a shitty obvious joke

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/ravioli- ... e-formuoli

User avatar
technokek
 
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
Byond Username: Technokek

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby technokek » Thu Jan 07, 2021 4:58 pm #586669

Guess since this is going nowhere I am asking for a head admin review

User avatar
Armhulen
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
Byond Username: Armhulenn
Github Username: bazelart

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby Armhulen » Fri Jan 08, 2021 12:16 am #586744

I'm Ignoring any argument you've had with sticky because fine whatever sticky uses real statistics and your do the epic "i like lolis" troll. Even ignoring that there are multiple times you both kickstart the conversation about the legality of loli content and then also in that same argument you act like a total weirdo

I'll start with the most recent, you talking to lepi for posting this:

Spoiler:
Image


which came from the 26th, a debate about lolis you started:

Spoiler:
Image


which led to some unadulterated cringe i've never seen sticky even come close to:

Spoiler:
Image


which, after it's conclusion you repeatedly tried to restart (last message catching us up to OP image):

Spoiler:
Image


If anyone had looked into how you composed yourself on the 26th you would have already been banned, and this is all an entire precursor to the 12/10 logs WITHOUT sticky.
Image

User avatar
Armhulen
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
Byond Username: Armhulenn
Github Username: bazelart

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby Armhulen » Fri Jan 08, 2021 12:18 am #586745

the ball is in the headmin's court now ig
Image

User avatar
technokek
 
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
Byond Username: Technokek

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby technokek » Fri Jan 08, 2021 7:38 am #586771

Armhulen wrote:I'm Ignoring any argument you've had with sticky because fine whatever sticky uses real statistics and your do the epic "i like lolis" troll. Even ignoring that there are multiple times you both kickstart the conversation about the legality of loli content and then also in that same argument you act like a total weirdo

I'll start with the most recent, you talking to lepi for posting this:

Spoiler:
Image


which came from the 26th, a debate about lolis you started:

Spoiler:
Image


which led to some unadulterated cringe i've never seen sticky even come close to:

Spoiler:
Image


which, after it's conclusion you repeatedly tried to restart (last message catching us up to OP image):

Spoiler:
Image


If anyone had looked into how you composed yourself on the 26th you would have already been banned, and this is all an entire precursor to the 12/10 logs WITHOUT sticky.



Thanks for saying I started that conversation. That's is absolutely false. I got called a pedo like 20 times that day in the channel and the discussion was already ongoing. Me posting those images are in reaction to someone saying "lolis are directly traced from children" so yes my images make sense in calling out bullshit that someone else posted. And in your screenshots. And again you are completely ignoring any context since there are multiple admins visible and where involved in said discussion so saying anyone would ban me is just false. And I still don't see any proof of me encouraging the pornographic use of lolis or even saying that I like them. Banning lolis is basically the same as banning child actors.

I even directly pinged a headadmin with what I posted because people kept pinging @discordjanny saying I post pedophile content. So yes a a headadmin did look at the discussion at that time and concluded it was ok.

User avatar
technokek
 
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
Byond Username: Technokek

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby technokek » Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:53 am #586773

i keep getting messages that people literally dont understand my point.

according to various websites loli = age / gender .

i have seen no proof that loli itself is a sexual thing.

So yes saying banning loli is like banning child actors makes sense your dipshits.

I still dont watch anime so correct me if i am wrong

User avatar
Vekter
In-Game Admin
 
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: Fucking around with the engine.
Byond Username: Vekter

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby Vekter » Fri Jan 08, 2021 10:10 am #586777

Loli is short for "lolicon", which in itself is short for "Lolita complex". This is named after a book called Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov in which an older man literally has a sexual relationship with a young woman.

Loli is, by definition, sexual.

Yes, I'm a weeb.
Image
Image
Image


Spoiler:
Reply PM from-REDACTED/(REDACTED): i tried to remove the bruises by changing her gender

PM: Bluespace->Delaron: Nobody wants a mime's asscheeks farting on their brig windows.

PM: REDACTED->HotelBravoLima: Oh come on, knowing that these are hostile aliens is metagaming

[17:43] <Aranclanos> any other question ping me again
[17:43] <Vekter> Aranclanos for nicest coder 2015
[17:44] <Aranclanos> fuck you

User avatar
technokek
 
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
Byond Username: Technokek

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby technokek » Fri Jan 08, 2021 11:13 am #586780

Vekter wrote:Loli is short for "lolicon", which in itself is short for "Lolita complex". This is named after a book called Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov in which an older man literally has a sexual relationship with a young woman.

Loli is, by definition, sexual.

Yes, I'm a weeb.



Thanks for beeing the first person to actually clear this up.

I agree now that many of my statements are highly inappropriate about it should not be on the discord.

User avatar
technokek
 
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
Byond Username: Technokek

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby technokek » Sat Jan 09, 2021 8:02 pm #586912

based armhulen make more shit up

Image

Image

i never did that.

User avatar
The Respected Man
 
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2018 7:31 am
Byond Username: The Respected Man

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby The Respected Man » Sat Jan 09, 2021 8:22 pm #586914

technokek wrote:based armhulen make more shit up

Image

Image

i never did that.

Image

User avatar
Armhulen
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
Byond Username: Armhulenn
Github Username: bazelart

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby Armhulen » Sat Jan 09, 2021 9:51 pm #586922

Those terms are synonymous
Image

User avatar
technokek
 
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
Byond Username: Technokek

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby technokek » Sat Jan 09, 2021 11:19 pm #586938


User avatar
Armhulen
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
Byond Username: Armhulenn
Github Username: bazelart

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby Armhulen » Sat Jan 09, 2021 11:24 pm #586942

Oh so NOW you're the expert

please reread what vekter said, and keep digging that hole

Vekter wrote:Loli is short for "lolicon", which in itself is short for "Lolita complex". This is named after a book called Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov in which an older man literally has a sexual relationship with a young woman.

Loli is, by definition, sexual.

Yes, I'm a weeb.
Image

User avatar
technokek
 
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
Byond Username: Technokek

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby technokek » Sun Jan 10, 2021 12:49 am #586948

Armhulen wrote:Oh so NOW you're the expert

please reread what vekter said, and keep digging that hole

Vekter wrote:Loli is short for "lolicon", which in itself is short for "Lolita complex". This is named after a book called Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov in which an older man literally has a sexual relationship with a young woman.

Loli is, by definition, sexual.

Yes, I'm a weeb.



yes me the expert going for the first result on google, that the most expert thing to do googeling something you dont know.

if you dont know how to google: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=loli here is some help.

All results on the first page support my argument that loli / lolicon are not the same thing.

There are litterally a bunch of articles defining lolis as the characters, and lolicons as the people that are into those characters.

Are you legit unable to read?

User avatar
MrAlphonzo
In-Game Admin
 
Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 10:55 pm
Location: U S A, U S A, U S A
Byond Username: MrAlphonzo

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby MrAlphonzo » Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:04 am #586956

I'm locking this unhinged nightmare until some poor head admin comes along to unleash the beast.
Image
Image
Image
Spoiler:
wesoda25 wrote:i love alphonzo and he can be a lot of fun but bro you need to get laid come on

User avatar
Coconutwarrior97
In-Game Head Admin
 
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 3:14 am
Byond Username: Coconutwarrior97

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

Postby Coconutwarrior97 » Mon Jan 18, 2021 5:20 am #587619

There is more than one instance here of you toeing the line or just outright being creepy with the content you've posted/discussed on the discord. With that in mind we have no issue with this ban sticking.

Headmin Votes:
Coconutwarrior97: Deny appeal.
Domitius: Deny appeal.
Naloac: Deny appeal.


Return to Resolved Appeals

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users