[armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
- technokek
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
- Byond Username: Technokek
[armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
BYOND account: Techno#7612
Ban type: Discord
Ban length: Permanent
Ban reason:
Time ban was placed: 07.01.2021
Server you were playing on when banned: Discord
Round ID in which ban was placed: This is retarded how am i a "creep"
Why you think you should be unbanned: I said i dont watch anime so i dont care about lolies, i cant belive we are are actually having this discussion
Ban type: Discord
Ban length: Permanent
Ban reason:
Time ban was placed: 07.01.2021
Server you were playing on when banned: Discord
Round ID in which ban was placed: This is retarded how am i a "creep"
Why you think you should be unbanned: I said i dont watch anime so i dont care about lolies, i cant belive we are are actually having this discussion
- Armhulen
- Global Moderator
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
- Byond Username: Armhulenn
- Github Username: bazelart
- Location: The Grand Tournament
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
I wanna say that I used that as an example and you are more generally a creep:
armhulenToday at 4:57 PM
i should say that this isn't from that one discussion but just how techno has always been and i think no person should be a vocal supporter of that content
for any reason.
If headmins wanna let him back into the discord, i guess. but there is no more unenjoyable environment for new people than to come into the discord and see the pedophile devil's advocate
armhulenToday at 4:57 PM
i should say that this isn't from that one discussion but just how techno has always been and i think no person should be a vocal supporter of that content
for any reason.
If headmins wanna let him back into the discord, i guess. but there is no more unenjoyable environment for new people than to come into the discord and see the pedophile devil's advocate
- technokek
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
- Byond Username: Technokek
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
Armhulen wrote:I wanna say that I used that as an example and you are more generally a creep:
armhulenToday at 4:57 PM
i should say that this isn't from that one discussion but just how techno has always been and i think no person should be a vocal supporter of that content
for any reason.
If headmins wanna let him back into the discord, i guess. but there is no more unenjoyable environment for new people than to come into the discord and see the pedophile devil's advocate
First of all thank you for your quick response.
I have never endorsed loli or pedophilic contend, I simply stated in the daily discuss in politics that where going on for quite some time one the topic of loli that :
1. I don't not watch anime or the porn form
2. I don't think actual pedophilia should be connected to drawings since it is is dishonest to actually victims of pedophilia.
3. I gave examples of how Amazon is selling practically nude depictions of anime girls, because someone wouldn't belive me that they where selling it.
4. That loli is from my understanding just the definition of a underage character and not directly related to pornographic contend.
I have never endorsed the usage of "lolis" in pornographic material.
I simply don't care as I have been to a very cool catholic school in germany "AKO" with multiple priest that ACTUALLY made sexual advances on children.
Again I have never advocated for the use of underage anime characters in pornographic material.
I simply couldn't care less if some guy in Indonesia draws some dumb cartoons. <-- Cartoon not porn.
Thanks for making me google all this garbage
- technokek
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
- Byond Username: Technokek
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
Addendum: I would fully understand if you banned me for saying stuff like "I wanna jack off to those underage anime girls" or something similar, but I do not recall ever doing that and since I am banned I can neither verify I didn't say it or delete any evidence of me saying it. Again I do not endorse pornographic use of underage characters, but banning the general use of a underage character in a PG13 cartoon is kinda dumb in my epic opinion.
Like would you ban child actors too?
Again I don't not endorse the pornographic use of children in any form nor have I ever done that.
Like would you ban child actors too?
Again I don't not endorse the pornographic use of children in any form nor have I ever done that.
- technokek
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
- Byond Username: Technokek
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
I genuinely believe this is a misunderstanding. I think you came to the conclusion that I actually support sexualization of under children. This is simply not the case. From what I understand the term loli does not describe a sexual depiction of a character it only refers to its age and gender. I didn't want to make another comment on my own thread. Did you see me advocating for the sexual use or these characters on discord? Because that does not reflect my opinion
- technokek
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
- Byond Username: Technokek
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
hello i am now continuing this monologue.
is me litterally saying
kinda cringe to ban me for a obvious joke.
Anyway dont mind this:
yes there is more... no i will not post it.
is me litterally saying
this is not a epic thing to post but, this is the only message in 14,425 other post that can be even closely be interpreted as me being "creepy".technokek wrote:I wanna jack off to those underage anime girls
kinda cringe to ban me for a obvious joke.
Anyway dont mind this:
yes there is more... no i will not post it.
- Stickymayhem
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:13 pm
- Byond Username: Stickymayhem
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
I've been invoked so I guess I have to reply with context.technokek wrote:hello i am now continuing this monologue.
is me litterally sayingthis is not a epic thing to post but, this is the only message in 14,425 other post that can be even closely be interpreted as me being "creepy".technokek wrote:I wanna jack off to those underage anime girls
kinda cringe to ban me for a obvious joke.
Anyway dont mind this:
yes there is more... no i will not post it.
Loli is fucking disgusting but the data is unfortunately against common decency on this one.
I stand by those posts and will back the research to my own optical detriment.
That last post is out of context, and referring to someone who said something along the lines of all loli being harmful to real children, and I clarified that not all loli is traced from real cp.
Posting lolis in the discord is cringe and should get you dumpstered every time.
Boris wrote:Sticky is a jackass who has worms where his brain should be, but he also gets exactly what SS13 should be
- technokek
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
- Byond Username: Technokek
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
i never posted loli on the discord, i linked to a amazon (i made sure to break the link apart to preven embedding) listing on the discord, no actual loli pictures where posted by me. I used you since your post out of context look bad too and exactly that is beeing used against me.Stickymayhem wrote:I've been invoked so I guess I have to reply with context.technokek wrote:hello i am now continuing this monologue.
is me litterally sayingthis is not a epic thing to post but, this is the only message in 14,425 other post that can be even closely be interpreted as me being "creepy".technokek wrote:I wanna jack off to those underage anime girls
kinda cringe to ban me for a obvious joke.
Anyway dont mind this:
yes there is more... no i will not post it.
Loli is fucking disgusting but the data is unfortunately against common decency on this one.
I stand by those posts and will back the research to my own optical detriment.
That last post is out of context, and referring to someone who said something along the lines of all loli being harmful to real children, and I clarified that not all loli is traced from real cp.
Posting lolis in the discord is cringe and should get you dumpstered every time.
- Stickymayhem
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:13 pm
- Byond Username: Stickymayhem
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
I never said I wanted to bang lolis so let's keep some distinctions between us yeah budtechnokek wrote:i never posted loli on the discord, i linked to a amazon (i made sure to break the link apart to preven embedding) listing on the discord, no actual loli pictures where posted by me. I used you since your post out of context look bad too and exactly that is beeing used against me.Stickymayhem wrote:I've been invoked so I guess I have to reply with context.technokek wrote:hello i am now continuing this monologue.
is me litterally sayingthis is not a epic thing to post but, this is the only message in 14,425 other post that can be even closely be interpreted as me being "creepy".technokek wrote:I wanna jack off to those underage anime girls
kinda cringe to ban me for a obvious joke.
Anyway dont mind this:
yes there is more... no i will not post it.
Loli is fucking disgusting but the data is unfortunately against common decency on this one.
I stand by those posts and will back the research to my own optical detriment.
That last post is out of context, and referring to someone who said something along the lines of all loli being harmful to real children, and I clarified that not all loli is traced from real cp.
Posting lolis in the discord is cringe and should get you dumpstered every time.
Boris wrote:Sticky is a jackass who has worms where his brain should be, but he also gets exactly what SS13 should be
- technokek
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
- Byond Username: Technokek
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
its litterally a shitty obvious jokeStickymayhem wrote:I never said I wanted to bang lolis so let's keep some distinctions between us yeah budtechnokek wrote:i never posted loli on the discord, i linked to a amazon (i made sure to break the link apart to preven embedding) listing on the discord, no actual loli pictures where posted by me. I used you since your post out of context look bad too and exactly that is beeing used against me.Stickymayhem wrote:I've been invoked so I guess I have to reply with context.technokek wrote:hello i am now continuing this monologue.
is me litterally sayingthis is not a epic thing to post but, this is the only message in 14,425 other post that can be even closely be interpreted as me being "creepy".technokek wrote:I wanna jack off to those underage anime girls
kinda cringe to ban me for a obvious joke.
Anyway dont mind this:
yes there is more... no i will not post it.
Loli is fucking disgusting but the data is unfortunately against common decency on this one.
I stand by those posts and will back the research to my own optical detriment.
That last post is out of context, and referring to someone who said something along the lines of all loli being harmful to real children, and I clarified that not all loli is traced from real cp.
Posting lolis in the discord is cringe and should get you dumpstered every time.
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/ravioli- ... e-formuoli
- technokek
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
- Byond Username: Technokek
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
Guess since this is going nowhere I am asking for a head admin review
- Armhulen
- Global Moderator
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
- Byond Username: Armhulenn
- Github Username: bazelart
- Location: The Grand Tournament
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
I'm Ignoring any argument you've had with sticky because fine whatever sticky uses real statistics and your do the epic "i like lolis" troll. Even ignoring that there are multiple times you both kickstart the conversation about the legality of loli content and then also in that same argument you act like a total weirdo
I'll start with the most recent, you talking to lepi for posting this:
which came from the 26th, a debate about lolis you started:
which led to some unadulterated cringe i've never seen sticky even come close to:
which, after it's conclusion you repeatedly tried to restart (last message catching us up to OP image):
If anyone had looked into how you composed yourself on the 26th you would have already been banned, and this is all an entire precursor to the 12/10 logs WITHOUT sticky.
I'll start with the most recent, you talking to lepi for posting this:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
- Armhulen
- Global Moderator
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
- Byond Username: Armhulenn
- Github Username: bazelart
- Location: The Grand Tournament
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
the ball is in the headmin's court now ig
- technokek
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
- Byond Username: Technokek
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
Armhulen wrote:I'm Ignoring any argument you've had with sticky because fine whatever sticky uses real statistics and your do the epic "i like lolis" troll. Even ignoring that there are multiple times you both kickstart the conversation about the legality of loli content and then also in that same argument you act like a total weirdo
I'll start with the most recent, you talking to lepi for posting this:
which came from the 26th, a debate about lolis you started:Spoiler:
which led to some unadulterated cringe i've never seen sticky even come close to:Spoiler:
which, after it's conclusion you repeatedly tried to restart (last message catching us up to OP image):Spoiler:
If anyone had looked into how you composed yourself on the 26th you would have already been banned, and this is all an entire precursor to the 12/10 logs WITHOUT sticky.Spoiler:
Thanks for saying I started that conversation. That's is absolutely false. I got called a pedo like 20 times that day in the channel and the discussion was already ongoing. Me posting those images are in reaction to someone saying "lolis are directly traced from children" so yes my images make sense in calling out bullshit that someone else posted. And in your screenshots. And again you are completely ignoring any context since there are multiple admins visible and where involved in said discussion so saying anyone would ban me is just false. And I still don't see any proof of me encouraging the pornographic use of lolis or even saying that I like them. Banning lolis is basically the same as banning child actors.
I even directly pinged a headadmin with what I posted because people kept pinging @discordjanny saying I post pedophile content. So yes a a headadmin did look at the discussion at that time and concluded it was ok.
- technokek
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
- Byond Username: Technokek
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
i keep getting messages that people literally dont understand my point.
according to various websites loli = age / gender .
i have seen no proof that loli itself is a sexual thing.
So yes saying banning loli is like banning child actors makes sense your dipshits.
I still dont watch anime so correct me if i am wrong
according to various websites loli = age / gender .
i have seen no proof that loli itself is a sexual thing.
So yes saying banning loli is like banning child actors makes sense your dipshits.
I still dont watch anime so correct me if i am wrong
- Vekter
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:25 pm
- Byond Username: Vekter
- Location: Fucking around with the engine.
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
Loli is short for "lolicon", which in itself is short for "Lolita complex". This is named after a book called Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov in which an older man literally has a sexual relationship with a young woman.
Loli is, by definition, sexual.
Yes, I'm a weeb.
Loli is, by definition, sexual.
Yes, I'm a weeb.
- technokek
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
- Byond Username: Technokek
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
Vekter wrote:Loli is short for "lolicon", which in itself is short for "Lolita complex". This is named after a book called Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov in which an older man literally has a sexual relationship with a young woman.
Loli is, by definition, sexual.
Yes, I'm a weeb.
Thanks for beeing the first person to actually clear this up.
I agree now that many of my statements are highly inappropriate about it should not be on the discord.
- technokek
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
- Byond Username: Technokek
- The Respected Man
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2018 7:31 am
- Byond Username: The Respected Man
- Armhulen
- Global Moderator
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
- Byond Username: Armhulenn
- Github Username: bazelart
- Location: The Grand Tournament
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
Those terms are synonymous
- technokek
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
- Byond Username: Technokek
- Armhulen
- Global Moderator
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
- Byond Username: Armhulenn
- Github Username: bazelart
- Location: The Grand Tournament
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
Oh so NOW you're the expert
please reread what vekter said, and keep digging that hole
please reread what vekter said, and keep digging that hole
Vekter wrote:Loli is short for "lolicon", which in itself is short for "Lolita complex". This is named after a book called Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov in which an older man literally has a sexual relationship with a young woman.
Loli is, by definition, sexual.
Yes, I'm a weeb.
- technokek
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
- Byond Username: Technokek
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
Armhulen wrote:Oh so NOW you're the expert
please reread what vekter said, and keep digging that hole
Vekter wrote:Loli is short for "lolicon", which in itself is short for "Lolita complex". This is named after a book called Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov in which an older man literally has a sexual relationship with a young woman.
Loli is, by definition, sexual.
Yes, I'm a weeb.
yes me the expert going for the first result on google, that the most expert thing to do googeling something you dont know.
if you dont know how to google: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=loli here is some help.
All results on the first page support my argument that loli / lolicon are not the same thing.
There are litterally a bunch of articles defining lolis as the characters, and lolicons as the people that are into those characters.
Are you legit unable to read?
- MrAlphonzo
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 10:55 pm
- Byond Username: MrAlphonzo
- Location: U S A, U S A, U S A
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
I'm locking this unhinged nightmare until some poor head admin comes along to unleash the beast.
- Coconutwarrior97
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 3:14 am
- Byond Username: Coconutwarrior97
Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"
There is more than one instance here of you toeing the line or just outright being creepy with the content you've posted/discussed on the discord. With that in mind we have no issue with this ban sticking.
Headmin Votes:
Coconutwarrior97: Deny appeal.
Domitius: Deny appeal.
Naloac: Deny appeal.
Headmin Votes:
Coconutwarrior97: Deny appeal.
Domitius: Deny appeal.
Naloac: Deny appeal.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Vekter