golem peanut
Forum rules
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
- Malkraz
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 3:20 am
- Byond Username: Malkraz
golem peanut
https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic ... 1&p=588707
2018 tg: You can't genocide the station due to a few naughty crew
2021 tg: You can't defend your own life more than once
just remove golem at this point then lol
2018 tg: You can't genocide the station due to a few naughty crew
2021 tg: You can't defend your own life more than once
just remove golem at this point then lol
wesoda24: malkrax you're a loser because your forum signature is people talking about you
- thehogshotgun
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:31 am
- Byond Username: Thehogshotgun
- Location: The best damn country in the world
Re: golem peanut
As opposed to non-lethally killing them?As an iron golem got into an altercation with a crew member that resulted in them lethally killing the crew member.
- Rohen_Tahir
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:00 pm
- Byond Username: Rohen Tahir
- Location: Primary fool storage
- Contact:
Re: golem peanut
He killed the crewmember to death.thehogshotgun wrote:As opposed to non-lethally killing them?As an iron golem got into an altercation with a crew member that resulted in them lethally killing the crew member.
Re: golem peanut
Logs might shed some light on this but my thinking is if non-sec get involved in other players conflict they open themself up to the same level of escalation.
Also how unrobust were those players that they used lethals first and both died?
Golems can't even use guns!
Also how unrobust were those players that they used lethals first and both died?
Golems can't even use guns!
- Screemonster
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:23 pm
- Byond Username: Scree
Re: golem peanut
people die when they are killedthehogshotgun wrote:As opposed to non-lethally killing them?As an iron golem got into an altercation with a crew member that resulted in them lethally killing the crew member.
- Farquaar
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 7:20 am
- Byond Username: Farquaar
- Location: Delta Quadrant
- NoxVS
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2018 7:43 pm
- Byond Username: NoxVS
Re: golem peanut
ScienceFarquaar wrote:Was he a lavaland golem or a science golem?
The weak should fear the strong
thehogshotgun wrote:How does having jannies like you, who have more brain tumor than brain benefit the server
-
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
- Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli
Re: golem peanut
4 sybil players died to a unarmed golem, the state of american servers
- Screemonster
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:23 pm
- Byond Username: Scree
Re: golem peanut
okay so golem or not
if a nonantag mistakes you for a traitor and attacks you, are you supposed to just lie down and take it now
guess I'm not allowed to kill someone that's actively attacking me
if a nonantag mistakes you for a traitor and attacks you, are you supposed to just lie down and take it now
guess I'm not allowed to kill someone that's actively attacking me
- Horza
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 9:43 pm
- Byond Username: HorzBor
Re: golem peanut
No you can only kill the person that you validly escalated but anyone standing nearby without an accurate assessment of the situation can kill you and you have to sit there and die.Screemonster wrote:okay so golem or not
if a nonantag mistakes you for a traitor and attacks you, are you supposed to just lie down and take it now
guess I'm not allowed to kill someone that's actively attacking me
Spürdo spädre sbrölölö :DDDDD
- Super Aggro Crag
- In Game PermaBanned
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:47 pm
- Byond Username: Super Aggro Crag
- FantasticFwoosh
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 11:25 pm
- Byond Username: FantasticFwoosh
Re: golem peanut
They should know thier place, Smoothskin trash.Tlaltecuhtli wrote:4 sybil players died to a unarmed golem, the state of american servers
At the same time any golem worth any grit would have teleported mechsuits straight in and blazed the entire station down with attack-waves of chadgyaxes for their insolence so i am sorely disappointed by both parties.
Spoiler:
- XivilaiAnaxes
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 7:13 am
- Byond Username: XivilaiAnaxes
Re: golem peanut
Bruh didnt they say they were going to properly forum ban you after Deedub appealed?
It's a scam man, a total jannie conspiracy.
It's a scam man, a total jannie conspiracy.
Stickymayhem wrote:Imagine the sheer narcisssim required to genuinely believe you are this intelligent.
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: golem peanut
it was a science golemFantasticFwoosh wrote:They should know thier place, Smoothskin trash.Tlaltecuhtli wrote:4 sybil players died to a unarmed golem, the state of american servers
At the same time any golem worth any grit would have teleported mechsuits straight in and blazed the entire station down with attack-waves of chadgyaxes for their insolence so i am sorely disappointed by both parties.
-
- Forum Soft Banned
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
- Byond Username: Cacogen
Re: golem peanut
>russell shazbit stutterwhore destroyed by science's hubris
>idiots then get their asses handed to them trying to intervene
that's roleplay baby
>idiots then get their asses handed to them trying to intervene
that's roleplay baby
technokek wrote:Cannot prove this so just belive me if when say this
NSFW:
- FantasticFwoosh
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 11:25 pm
- Byond Username: FantasticFwoosh
Re: golem peanut
oranges wrote: it was a science golem
This makes no objective difference, merely a pronged attack from a seperate angle on the provoctuer.
Spoiler:
- Screemonster
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:23 pm
- Byond Username: Scree
Re: golem peanut
okay so
if a nonantag is attacked by another nonantag and kills their attacker, that's fine
if another nonantag witnesses this and attacks the survivor and is killed too, that's suddenly not?
What would happen if the defending player lost? Would it be valid (because defending yourself against a lethal attack with lethal force makes you valid apparently) or would the third-party get banned for killing a nonantag?
If I, a nonantag player witnessing a fight with no context, attack the survivor and someone ends up dead, why should the person I attacked be on the hook for a ban if I lose if I'm not on the hook for nonantag murder if I win?
If golems are subject to relaxed escalation in both directions then that pushes things even more in the direction of "nobody should get banned" than if it were a crewmember.
edit:
if a nonantag is attacked by another nonantag and kills their attacker, that's fine
if another nonantag witnesses this and attacks the survivor and is killed too, that's suddenly not?
What would happen if the defending player lost? Would it be valid (because defending yourself against a lethal attack with lethal force makes you valid apparently) or would the third-party get banned for killing a nonantag?
If I, a nonantag player witnessing a fight with no context, attack the survivor and someone ends up dead, why should the person I attacked be on the hook for a ban if I lose if I'm not on the hook for nonantag murder if I win?
If golems are subject to relaxed escalation in both directions then that pushes things even more in the direction of "nobody should get banned" than if it were a crewmember.
edit:
it could also have been avoided with some restraint and common sense on the part of the two dipshits who decided "A FIGHT, I'LL JOIN IN REGARDLESS OF CONTEXT" and got their asses handed to themdelaron wrote:This will likely require a headmin to overrule as I reviewed the logs and spoke to Brayd during the round after.
They were not disrespectful but somewhat dismissive of the idea that self defense collateral to multiple others was ok.
At the end of the day a Iron Golem got into it with a crew member and it ended deadly for the crew member. Two additional crew members died trying to fight the killer golem. This could have been avoided with restraint and common sense when playing a ghost role. I will not be over turning the 2 day ban. This is in the hands of the headmin to overturn. Your previous notes played a part in my decision but the ban stands alone on merit of death count.
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: golem peanut
So where would they get the teleporting mechs from jasonFantasticFwoosh wrote:This makes no objective difference, merely a pronged attack from a seperate angle on the provoctuer.oranges wrote: it was a science golem
- FantasticFwoosh
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 11:25 pm
- Byond Username: FantasticFwoosh
Re: golem peanut
Its the middle of science, the mecca of powergaming makes this approach trivial. Simply build a 3-machine gate teleporter with a grid independent hacked APC if fearful of AI intervention. Kevinz revoked the AI's ability to do anything about unrestrained technology aeons ago in deleting technodes, or much least saboteurs can gather the nessecary resources from the teleporter room and anything else out of the ore silo.
Having a golem out and about to scout as a spotter with a marked teleporter beacon in a concealed place for a co-ordinate to lay down helps or just land in normal convenience spots. Instantly applicable war crimes as mechs materialise out of thin air around the station.
Having a golem out and about to scout as a spotter with a marked teleporter beacon in a concealed place for a co-ordinate to lay down helps or just land in normal convenience spots. Instantly applicable war crimes as mechs materialise out of thin air around the station.
Spoiler:
- Yenwodyah
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2018 10:47 pm
- Byond Username: Yenwodyah
- Github Username: Yenwodyah
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: golem peanut
I agree but only because I think they're kind of boring
- Mothblocks
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 9:33 am
- Byond Username: Jaredfogle
Re: golem peanut
came here to say this havent even read the appeal or any other replyoranges wrote:I agree but only because I think they're kind of boring
Head Coder of /tg/station, hi!Shaps-cloud wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 7:59 am May eventually become one of the illusive maintainer-headmins if they choose to pursue that path, having a coder in the senior admin leadership has usually been positive for both sides in the past.
Head Admin of /tg/station Feb 2022.
Mothblocks everywhere, >>> Say nice things about me <<<
-
- Forum Soft Banned
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
- Byond Username: Cacogen
Re: golem peanut
They've always been slow as fuck which makes them intolerable to play as. If I remember correctly this was insurance against the kneejerk backlash to introducing a feature that allows players to come back as humanoids on the station.
technokek wrote:Cannot prove this so just belive me if when say this
NSFW:
- Rohen_Tahir
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:00 pm
- Byond Username: Rohen Tahir
- Location: Primary fool storage
- Contact:
Re: golem peanut
>he doesn't know how to quickgolemcacogen wrote:They've always been slow as fuck which makes them intolerable to play as. If I remember correctly this was insurance against the kneejerk backlash to introducing a feature that allows players to come back as humanoids on the station.
-
- Forum Soft Banned
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
- Byond Username: Cacogen
Re: golem peanut
For at least the free golems I don't think they need the slowdown to begin with.
technokek wrote:Cannot prove this so just belive me if when say this
NSFW:
- XivilaiAnaxes
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 7:13 am
- Byond Username: XivilaiAnaxes
Re: golem peanut
based
Stickymayhem wrote:Imagine the sheer narcisssim required to genuinely believe you are this intelligent.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Donglesplonge, GPeckman, Scriptis, Timberpoes, Timonk