Bottom post of the previous page:
lolttps://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=28900&view=unread#unread
Bottom post of the previous page:
lolShould have voted for me sweetheartCobby wrote:They left out cringe no one is going to bring up and will be lost when they appeal later.BeeSting12 wrote:
My take on it is that if the details mattered enough to keep them banned then it’s stupid to not include in the reason because it’s very possible it gets lost. Don’t have to go into details regarding anything but the thing holding back the unban being accepted.
Mfw we don’t even have public bans yet so who cares what you put into the reason.
Head Coder of /tg/station, hi!Shaps-cloud wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 7:59 am May eventually become one of the illusive maintainer-headmins if they choose to pursue that path, having a coder in the senior admin leadership has usually been positive for both sides in the past.
I'm pretty interested in what things will look like for this when they do appeal this in that years time.Cobby wrote:They left out cringe no one is going to bring up and will be lost when they appeal later.BeeSting12 wrote:
My take on it is that if the details mattered enough to keep them banned then it’s stupid to not include in the reason because it’s very possible it gets lost. Don’t have to go into details regarding anything but the thing holding back the unban being accepted.
Mfw we don’t even have public bans yet so who cares what you put into the reason.
Do you like not want to purchase the Зубной порошок?
the banning admin will state that there was more to it than in the ban reason and that they should stay banned, headmins will take some vague explanation thats probably inaccurate because the details were in fact lost to time and that'll be thatMisdoubtful wrote:I'm pretty interested in what things will look like for this when they do appeal this in that years time.Cobby wrote:They left out cringe no one is going to bring up and will be lost when they appeal later.BeeSting12 wrote:
My take on it is that if the details mattered enough to keep them banned then it’s stupid to not include in the reason because it’s very possible it gets lost. Don’t have to go into details regarding anything but the thing holding back the unban being accepted.
Mfw we don’t even have public bans yet so who cares what you put into the reason.
completely wrongterranaut wrote:the banning admin will state that there was more to it than in the ban reason and that they should stay banned, headmins will take some vague explanation thats probably inaccurate because the details were in fact lost to time and that'll be thatMisdoubtful wrote:I'm pretty interested in what things will look like for this when they do appeal this in that years time.Cobby wrote:They left out cringe no one is going to bring up and will be lost when they appeal later.BeeSting12 wrote:
My take on it is that if the details mattered enough to keep them banned then it’s stupid to not include in the reason because it’s very possible it gets lost. Don’t have to go into details regarding anything but the thing holding back the unban being accepted.
Mfw we don’t even have public bans yet so who cares what you put into the reason.
completely wrongIkeTG wrote:completely wrongterranaut wrote:the banning admin will state that there was more to it than in the ban reason and that they should stay banned, headmins will take some vague explanation thats probably inaccurate because the details were in fact lost to time and that'll be thatMisdoubtful wrote:I'm pretty interested in what things will look like for this when they do appeal this in that years time.Cobby wrote:They left out cringe no one is going to bring up and will be lost when they appeal later.BeeSting12 wrote:
My take on it is that if the details mattered enough to keep them banned then it’s stupid to not include in the reason because it’s very possible it gets lost. Don’t have to go into details regarding anything but the thing holding back the unban being accepted.
Mfw we don’t even have public bans yet so who cares what you put into the reason.
you're rightRohen_Tahir wrote:completely wrongIkeTG wrote:completely wrongterranaut wrote:the banning admin will state that there was more to it than in the ban reason and that they should stay banned, headmins will take some vague explanation thats probably inaccurate because the details were in fact lost to time and that'll be thatMisdoubtful wrote:I'm pretty interested in what things will look like for this when they do appeal this in that years time.Cobby wrote:They left out cringe no one is going to bring up and will be lost when they appeal later.BeeSting12 wrote:
My take on it is that if the details mattered enough to keep them banned then it’s stupid to not include in the reason because it’s very possible it gets lost. Don’t have to go into details regarding anything but the thing holding back the unban being accepted.
Mfw we don’t even have public bans yet so who cares what you put into the reason.
Stickymayhem wrote:Imagine the sheer narcisssim required to genuinely believe you are this intelligent.