Policy Discussion houses discussions about policy, but also frequently about config changes.
Here are some recent examples:
viewtopic.php?f=33&t=30516 - we should add "barista" to the fake admin rank
viewtopic.php?f=33&t=30567 - Disable 100 threat rounds from Manuel
viewtopic.php?f=33&t=30392 - Add Clown Ops to Dynamic
viewtopic.php?f=33&t=30319 - Change the AI Lawset Weights Config
viewtopic.php?f=33&t=30532 - A single Laughter Demon as a high impact dynamic ruleset
viewtopic.php?f=33&t=30264 - Turn assistants rainbow suits back on!
Would be nice to rename the board to something like "Policy Discussion & Headmin Requests", or something, to represent this.
Rename Policy Discussion to include the fact that it spans more than just policy discussion
- Mothblocks
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 9:33 am
- Byond Username: Jaredfogle
Rename Policy Discussion to include the fact that it spans more than just policy discussion
Head Coder of /tg/station, hi!Shaps-cloud wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 7:59 am May eventually become one of the illusive maintainer-headmins if they choose to pursue that path, having a coder in the senior admin leadership has usually been positive for both sides in the past.
Head Admin of /tg/station Feb 2022.
Mothblocks everywhere, >>> Say nice things about me <<<
- Tearling
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2021 4:40 pm
- Byond Username: Tearling
Re: Rename Policy Discussion to include the fact that it spans more than just policy discussion
I agree with this, but since it's christmas, I think "Policy Discussion & Santa's Wishlist" would be more seasonal.Mothblocks wrote: ↑Sat Dec 25, 2021 1:20 am Would be nice to rename the board to something like "Policy Discussion & Headmin Requests", or something, to represent this.
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 27, 2023 12:41 am From my perspective, players just want to genuinely be listened to. And I don't mean it condescendingly, but to genuinely have their say and for admins to listen, process it and reply. Even if you don't give two shits about what the player is saying, even if you disagree with every part of what they say, players are less likely to leave an ahelp pissed off if you've listened to them and given a reply that directly addresses what they've told you.
- Armhulen
- Global Moderator
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
- Byond Username: Armhulenn
- Github Username: bazelart
- Location: The Grand Tournament
Re: Rename Policy Discussion to include the fact that it spans more than just policy discussion
Maybe just "Policy and Config Discussion"
-
- Forum Soft Banned
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
- Byond Username: Cacogen
Re: Rename Policy Discussion to include the fact that it spans more than just policy discussion
policy and config discussion does have the specificity the original suggestion lacks
- dragomagol
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2020 11:04 pm
- Byond Username: Dragomagol
Re: Rename Policy Discussion to include the fact that it spans more than just policy discussion
We don't see the need in changing the name of Policy Discussion. The fact that the Policy Discussion rules includes config discussion is included in Policy Discussion Board Rule #4: This board is for discussing administrative policy and rules, including in-game server configuration.
Headmin Votes:
RaveRadbury: Agree
Dragomagol: Agree
NamelessFairy: Agree
Headmin Votes:
RaveRadbury: Agree
Dragomagol: Agree
NamelessFairy: Agree
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users