Bottom post of the previous page:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=32542Dreary Doom = BREAKS NAME POLICY
Dendy Doom = Okay
this just seems like bullying, really
Bottom post of the previous page:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=32542See I can get behind this, I hate it when its just "Well Im a moth so I can"iwishforducks wrote: ↑Thu Oct 06, 2022 4:21 ami love the idea that moth names are nicknames or given names because their real moth names are completely incomprehensibleDrag wrote: ↑Thu Oct 06, 2022 12:47 amSoup is a bad moth name and I will continue to think this until there is an actual policy that encourages names like thisOmega_DarkPotato wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:54 ami disagree with your take (and i think its bad) because youve in the past thought that soup wasnt a good moth name (it is)Drag wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 8:39 am I wish we had an actual naming policy if we're gonna bother trying to enforce it at all. Rather than what we have which is "if an admin thinks your name is stupid you have to change it." If it was ACTUALLY up to me a lot of y'all would need to go touch grass and think of a better name.
soup, in my eyes, is one of the best moth names because of this
i think people also forget that we give people nicknames all the time in real life and actually go by them over their real names
Me on my way to go name myself Soup McLampDrag wrote: ↑Thu Oct 06, 2022 8:16 amSee I can get behind this, I hate it when its just "Well Im a moth so I can"iwishforducks wrote: ↑Thu Oct 06, 2022 4:21 ami love the idea that moth names are nicknames or given names because their real moth names are completely incomprehensibleDrag wrote: ↑Thu Oct 06, 2022 12:47 amSoup is a bad moth name and I will continue to think this until there is an actual policy that encourages names like thisOmega_DarkPotato wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 11:54 ami disagree with your take (and i think its bad) because youve in the past thought that soup wasnt a good moth name (it is)Drag wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 8:39 am I wish we had an actual naming policy if we're gonna bother trying to enforce it at all. Rather than what we have which is "if an admin thinks your name is stupid you have to change it." If it was ACTUALLY up to me a lot of y'all would need to go touch grass and think of a better name.
soup, in my eyes, is one of the best moth names because of this
i think people also forget that we give people nicknames all the time in real life and actually go by them over their real names
> Human: Normal human names, the kind that won’t raise an eyebrow if you chose to name your child.Misdoubtful wrote: ↑Thu Oct 06, 2022 7:50 pm I went on Bee as a Moth named Soup for multiple rounds not too long ago. Everyone loved it and I heard not a peep of issue from anyone. This was in their enhanced roleplay environment.
Their naming guidelines are also pretty fantastic: https://wiki.beestation13.com/view/Naming_Guidelines
> Names containing "Moth" or "Lamp" are not permitted.Misdoubtful wrote: ↑Thu Oct 06, 2022 7:50 pm I went on Bee as a Moth named Soup for multiple rounds not too long ago. Everyone loved it and I heard not a peep of issue from anyone. This was in their enhanced roleplay environment.
Their naming guidelines are also pretty fantastic: https://wiki.beestation13.com/view/Naming_Guidelines
Truly incredible how coders can just make the game worse by removing things and then and then blame it on the admins/players. Genuinely impressive level of mental gymnasticsiamgoofball wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 1:48 pm what a useless ass headmin term of useless fucking middle managers, honestly, all we did was remove things from the codebase last term
It would be devastating to our pun gameTimberpoes wrote: ↑Thu Oct 06, 2022 9:34 pm> Human: Normal human names, the kind that won’t raise an eyebrow if you chose to name your child.Misdoubtful wrote: ↑Thu Oct 06, 2022 7:50 pm I went on Bee as a Moth named Soup for multiple rounds not too long ago. Everyone loved it and I heard not a peep of issue from anyone. This was in their enhanced roleplay environment.
Their naming guidelines are also pretty fantastic: https://wiki.beestation13.com/view/Naming_Guidelines
Somehow I can see this being even more arbitrarily enforced than our current naming policy for humans, and would certainly wipe a lot of our silly pun names off the radar right?
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 27, 2023 12:41 am From my perspective, players just want to genuinely be listened to. And I don't mean it condescendingly, but to genuinely have their say and for admins to listen, process it and reply. Even if you don't give two shits about what the player is saying, even if you disagree with every part of what they say, players are less likely to leave an ahelp pissed off if you've listened to them and given a reply that directly addresses what they've told you.
kieth4 wrote: infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo
There is a lot of very bizarre nonsense being talked on this forum. I shall now remain silent and logoff until my points are vindicated.
Player who complainted over being killed for looting cap office wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2023 1:33 am Hey there, I'm Virescent, the super evil person who made the stupid appeal and didn't think it through enough. Just came here to say: screech, retards. Screech and writhe like the worms you are. Your pathetic little cries will keep echoing around for a while before quietting down. There is one great outcome from this: I rised up the blood pressure of some of you shitheads and lowered your lifespan. I'm honestly tempted to do this more often just to see you screech and writhe more, but that wouldn't be cool of me. So come on haters, show me some more of your high blood pressure please.
HAH. HAHAHAH. HAHAHAHAHAHAH.
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 27, 2023 12:41 am From my perspective, players just want to genuinely be listened to. And I don't mean it condescendingly, but to genuinely have their say and for admins to listen, process it and reply. Even if you don't give two shits about what the player is saying, even if you disagree with every part of what they say, players are less likely to leave an ahelp pissed off if you've listened to them and given a reply that directly addresses what they've told you.
My thought process was based on it not being a name fitting for the setting. If that argument would work, then the basis for my rejection is certainly flawed and is so flimsy of a foundation to apply bare discretion that I didn't feel it was a just outcome.... At its core "this character name seemed fitting for a wacky space sci-fi flick" [would work].
Ya know a couple hours ago I was gonna snarkily respond to this about how "The headmins are too compassionate, considerate, and willing to compromise to pass through radical changes and that's why nothing gets done"iamgoofball wrote: ↑Sun Oct 09, 2022 10:35 am why can't we get a headmin term that gets anything done
iamgoofball wrote:Vekter and MrMelbert are more likely to enforce the roleplay rules Manuel is supposed to be abiding by than Wesoda or Jackraxxus are.
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 9:16 pm I highly doubt any other admin on the team would have given you this chance, except maybe Kieth because his brain worms are almost as bad as mine.
Vekter wrote: ↑Tue May 16, 2023 4:45 pm At what point does someone's refusal or failure to improve become malice in and of itself? If you give someone a year to stop shitting on the carpet and they keep doing it but get slightly closer to the bathroom every time and sometimes they get to the toilet before it happens, at what point does it become acceptable to just ask them to go shit in someone else's house?
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 7:00 pm I'm sorry, can we get a real player to resolve this appeal? I don't like this trial player. They can't even set their own name.
sinfulbliss wrote: ↑I almost prefer Rave's AI-generated "We cannot accept this appeal at this time. If you would like assistance appealing in the future, please dial 1-800-1984-1488."
Pandarsenic wrote: ↑Mon Dec 12, 2022 2:25 pm I think we can all agree that someone throwing a reverse revolver at Zyb as a secret test of character, and Zyb immediately fucking himself with it, is the best thing we all could have received for Christmas this year
A finger curls on the monkey's paw.Jackraxxus wrote: ↑Sun Oct 09, 2022 3:49 pmYa know a couple hours ago I was gonna snarkily respond to this about how "The headmins are too compassionate, considerate, and willing to compromise to pass through radical changes and that's why nothing gets done"iamgoofball wrote: ↑Sun Oct 09, 2022 10:35 am why can't we get a headmin term that gets anything done
But.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Lower your tone with me if your tracked play time doesn't look like this:Timonk wrote:You have clearly never seen his dickWesoda25 wrote:Genuinely think they should be blacklisted.
Flatulent wrote:of course you can change religion doing it while islamic however makes you lose your head from happiness
Perhaps this moment will be instructive in teaching you to be more wary of what you choose to enforce. You reversing your position in this matter not only revealed that deep down you disagree with your own judgement, but has also embarrassed your superiors that backed you. Now, it has turned into a proper embarrassment for the whole server. Not the brightest moment for TG, that's for sure. Best of success, I truly hope that you understood your error.
lolBONERMASTER wrote: ↑Sun Oct 09, 2022 6:44 pm Perhaps this moment will be instructive in teaching you to be more wary of what you choose to enforce. You reversing your position in this matter not only revealed that deep down you disagree with your own judgement, but has also embarrassed your superiors that backed you. Now, it has turned into a proper embarrassment for the whole server. Not the brightest moment for TG, that's for sure. Best of success, I truly hope that you understood your error.
With parting regards
-BONERMASTER
MrStonedOne wrote:I always read dendy's walls of text
You know that timber attempted to change his position, but the headmin rejected it, right?Aeri wrote: ↑Sun Oct 09, 2022 6:57 pm Generally I respect Timber but on this specific matter I think they're full of shit. Suffice to say there is no shortage of names out there on Manuel that have been active for similar lengths of time, or longer, and not had any action taken against them. This is just fucking with Dreary for reasons that are unclear to me and it shouldn't be happening.
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 27, 2023 12:41 am From my perspective, players just want to genuinely be listened to. And I don't mean it condescendingly, but to genuinely have their say and for admins to listen, process it and reply. Even if you don't give two shits about what the player is saying, even if you disagree with every part of what they say, players are less likely to leave an ahelp pissed off if you've listened to them and given a reply that directly addresses what they've told you.
I mean, WhoeverTearling wrote: ↑Sun Oct 09, 2022 7:11 pmYou know that timber attempted to change his position, but the headmin rejected it, right?Aeri wrote: ↑Sun Oct 09, 2022 6:57 pm Generally I respect Timber but on this specific matter I think they're full of shit. Suffice to say there is no shortage of names out there on Manuel that have been active for similar lengths of time, or longer, and not had any action taken against them. This is just fucking with Dreary for reasons that are unclear to me and it shouldn't be happening.
In this case, I believe it is not Timberpoes you should be criticizing, it is the headministration, or specifically Rave who worded the rejection.
All I see are 3 admins stood on eachothers' shoulders in a trenchcoat.TheFinalPotato wrote: ↑Sun Oct 09, 2022 9:33 pm Also dear everyone else, you guys are cocoposting again, don't cocopost. The manuelcord did it like a year back and it was fucking stupid. There's more then one headmin.
Yes.TheFinalPotato wrote: ↑Sun Oct 09, 2022 9:33 pm Moving past that, did the headmins really just deny an appeal just cause they didn't like the look of the guy?
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 27, 2023 12:41 am From my perspective, players just want to genuinely be listened to. And I don't mean it condescendingly, but to genuinely have their say and for admins to listen, process it and reply. Even if you don't give two shits about what the player is saying, even if you disagree with every part of what they say, players are less likely to leave an ahelp pissed off if you've listened to them and given a reply that directly addresses what they've told you.
sorry, he deleted your post in your appeal?dendydoom wrote: ↑Sun Oct 09, 2022 6:48 pm I know it's taboo and forbidden for me to post in here but Rave has seen fit to delete my post and lock the thread so I am without means of recourse.
I don't know where to begin or what to say. Nothing in any of the posts in my appeal were ever made to be insulting or unfairly critical of anyone or "self righteous" as Rave has seen fit to put it.
He has claimed that I have taken "pot shots" at him with my response yet I was merely responding to the specific contents of a post he made where he implied I was being histrionic, that I had a bad attitude, that I was demonstrating bad behaviour, that I was a problem player, and implied that I am difficult to deal with. Is any of that true? In all of my time playing I have never been spoken to for my behaviour. I play the game by the rules and when I feel that I disagree then I take the time and effort to communicate my argument respectfully in the appropriate channels because, until now, I have had faith that people who get into the headmin position are responsible enough to deliberate them with a modicum of impartiality. All I am guilty of is writing too much, which, fair enough, sorry for making you read a lot of words.
What did I even say that was so wrong to receive such pettiness in kind? Did I not grovel appropriately enough to appease his ego? Is that my responsibility? I didn't even ask for a headmin review in the first place, I said that I had made my argument with a headmin review in mind because I was already convinced that it was going to end up there. Timber asked for a headmin review because they felt they had made an application of the precedent fairly and wanted input from the headmins on what their opinion of this application of naming policy is. I would invite anyone to scour every inch of what I said and point out to me exactly where anything I said stepped over the line or was disrespectful. Every response I made was in reaction to a point that was being levied against me.
I'm honestly speechless, which is a new experience for me. Usually I'm capable of cranking out an essay on anything.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]