Lisa Green struggles to say "unban pls :D" in under 2300 words

[TheLoLSwat]

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=33402

im sorry i know posting your own peanut thread is some headass activity but i have been working on this for so fucking long please just let me have this i wont post in the actual thread i swear

[WineAllWine]

Good grief, I'd want to deny any appeal that was that long out of spite

[iwishforducks]

i can think of 1000 other things i could do in the time it takes for me to read that appeal

[Boot]

Holy shit we actually have someone breaking the "don't make a peanut thread about yourself" rule. Someone get BONERMASTER on the horn.

[Itseasytosee2me]

Atleast its colorful

[Redrover1760]

Playing-to-win is to focus exclusively on a competitive victory condition, such as killing all antagonists. It is not empowering yourself to achieve personal goals, or taking measures to survive the shift

Daily reminder that defending yourself is not "playing to win"

[Rageguy505]

there are no rules, do whatever you want in players club also follow the rules

[Sightld2]

If 2000 words is too much, we simply need better attention spans.

[NoxVS]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXPC2HXjrYU

[Redrover1760]

Textbook banbaiting. Running at a person with a baton and ahelping "why did he kill me wtf"

[BONERMASTER]

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=33402

im sorry i know posting your own peanut thread is some headass activity but-

Yes it is.


With warm regards
-BONERMASTER

[CPTANT]

Textbook banbaiting. Running at a person with a baton and ahelping "why did he kill me wtf"

This single sentence described the situation better than Lisa's 2300 word essay.

[dendydoom]

Good grief, I'd want to deny any appeal that was that long out of spite

Imagine getting owned for writing too much

could not be me

[WineAllWine]

If 2000 words is too much, we simply need better attention spans.

This is a silly spessman game, I genuinely think that no ban can be so complicated as to deserve an essay

[ekaterina]

Textbook banbaiting. Running at a person with a baton and ahelping "why did he kill me wtf"

This. At a member of command transporting a dangerous traitor, no less.
Interfering with this arrest makes you valid under "accessory" to "EOTC" per Space Law.

There's a 60% chance this admin is just mad because he lost to Lisa while playing at some point in the past.

[Timonk]

There's a 60% chance this admin is just mad because he lost to Lisa while playing at some point in the past.

And you have a 100% chance of posting the worst take overall (you have proven it again)

[ekaterina]

There's a 60% chance this admin is just mad because he lost to Lisa while playing at some point in the past.

And you have a 100% chance of posting the worst take overall (you have proven it again)

Your opinion is wrong.

[Timonk]

100% hit chance

[BONERMASTER]

"You miss 100% of all skillshots you don't take."
-Kaceytron, 2016 A.D.


With meaningful regards
-BONERMASTER

[LoveMirror]

Textbook banbaiting. Running at a person with a baton and ahelping "why did he kill me wtf"

This. At a member of command transporting a dangerous traitor, no less.
Interfering with this arrest makes you valid under "accessory" to "EOTC" per Space Law.

There's a 60% chance this admin is just mad because he lost to Lisa while playing at some point in the past.

SpaceLaw is a guideline not a rulebook, dingus.
Dented take (as is expected from your posting history)

[Drag]

There is no rule that states that you cannot make your own pnut thread.


However you look like an absolute clod if you do so and are prime bullying bait.

[CPTANT]

Not knowing that putting the disk in the safe doesn't count as "secured" for some code checks really isn't something that should weight into a ban. Putting it in the safe sounds secure (even though I would never do it).

[ekaterina]

SpaceLaw is a guideline not a rulebook, dingus.
Dented take (as is expected from your posting history)

I'm not going to listen to a FOB griefer talking to me about rules lmao
nor to a guy who tries to get an admin "cancelled" over a profile picture.

[CPTANT]

SpaceLaw is a guideline not a rulebook, dingus.
Dented take (as is expected from your posting history)

I'm not going to listen to a FOB griefer talking to me about rules lmao
nor to a guy who tries to get an admin "cancelled" over a profile picture.

The reaction to the complaint was far worse than the picture itself.

[ekaterina]

SpaceLaw is a guideline not a rulebook, dingus.
Dented take (as is expected from your posting history)

I'm not going to listen to a FOB griefer talking to me about rules lmao
nor to a guy who tries to get an admin "cancelled" over a profile picture.

The reaction to the complaint was far worse than the picture itself.

What did he do wrong in the complaint? He replied mostly with one-liners exposing how lacking in logic or facts LoveMirror's allegations were.

[Qbmax32]

guys come on this is Lisa’s peanut thread we need to keep things in their proper places!!

[LoveMirror]

guys come on this is Lisa’s peanut thread we need to keep things in their proper places!!

Derailing peanut moment.

[LoveMirror]

SpaceLaw is a guideline not a rulebook, dingus.
Dented take (as is expected from your posting history)

I'm not going to listen to a FOB griefer talking to me about rules lmao
nor to a guy who tries to get an admin "cancelled" over a profile picture.

Wrong.

[dirk_mcblade]

Nice novel

[conrad]

Ekat is at this point just a professional troll.

It's true. You can buy them for £9.99 on Etsy.

Spoiler:

Also did you guys try just using point defence with shield absorption? Omega suggested using Devastators, but I haven't found ships with large ballistics slots yet. So HMGs are doing the trick, and they're doing it really well.

[ekaterina]

Ekat is at this point just a professional troll.

It's true. You can buy them for £9.99 on Etsy.

Spoiler:

Also did you guys try just using point defence with shield absorption? Omega suggested using Devastators, but I haven't found ships with large ballistics slots yet. So HMGs are doing the trick, and they're doing it really well.

Aren't you the guy who posts Karl Popper? You'd know about trolling, that's for sure.

[Kendrickorium]

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=33402

im sorry i know posting your own peanut thread is some headass activity but i have been working on this for so fucking long please just let me have this i wont post in the actual thread i swear

I WAS GOING TO COMPLEMENT THE THREAD TITLE

THEN I SAW WHO MADE THE PEANUT

HOW DARE YOU

H O W D A R E Y O U

[Kendrickorium]

DUTIES AS CAPTAIN:

1. PUT THE NUKE DISK INSIDE YOUR BACKPACK
2. THAT'S LITERALLY IT THERES NOTHING ELSE

now that you know this, I hope you can spread your wings even further, and fly even higher.

[Redrover1760]

True code hates people who tuck the disk into bed just carry it instead.

[conrad]

There should definitely be code to not advance the nukie event counter if diskie is in bed taking a nap

[Vekter]

You deserve to have the appeal denied solely on the basis of you posting your own peanut /j

Also to expand on my post in Lisa's appeal, "putting it in the safe" is absolutely not secure because emags exist.

[vect0r]

Emags don't break the safe? It's acid and c-4.
Unless it got changed...

[CPTANT]

You deserve to have the appeal denied solely on the basis of you posting your own peanut /j

Also to expand on my post in Lisa's appeal, "putting it in the safe" is absolutely not secure because emags exist.

It doesn't matter if it is actually secure or not, what matters is that a genuine attempt at securing it has been made.

[Qbmax32]

putting the disk in the safe is arguably safer then the caps backpack sometimes because nukie teams don’t know how to open it half the time

[rasonj]

I don't understand why there is a mechanic to interact with the disk not being in the captains backpack if we intend to ban captains for not putting it in the backpack. The mere existence of the mechanic seems to imply it as a valid option.

[NoxVS]

I don't understand why there is a mechanic to interact with the disk not being in the captains backpack if we intend to ban captains for not putting it in the backpack. The mere existence of the mechanic seems to imply it as a valid option.

why is there a mechanic for bombs exploding and killing people if im going to get banned for making bombs and using them to explode the station and kill people

[Not-Dorsidarf]

I don't understand why there is a mechanic to interact with the disk not being in the captains backpack if we intend to ban captains for not putting it in the backpack. The mere existence of the mechanic seems to imply it as a valid option.

why is there a mechanic for bombs exploding and killing people if im going to get banned for making bombs and using them to explode the station and kill people

Why is there a mechanic for your mother

[Kendrickorium]

THE DISK

GOES

IN

THE BACKPACK

[Kendrickorium]

THATS

[Kendrickorium]

THE CAPTAINS

[Kendrickorium]

ONLY

[Kendrickorium]

FUCKING

[Kendrickorium]

JOB

[Misdoubtful]

I'm gonna be real here.

Can we like, all agree to stop writing novellas?

Please? It hurts my eyes.

[Epicgamer545]

I don't understand why there is a mechanic to interact with the disk not being in the captains backpack if we intend to ban captains for not putting it in the backpack. The mere existence of the mechanic seems to imply it as a valid option.

why is there a mechanic for bombs exploding and killing people if im going to get banned for making bombs and using them to explode the station and kill people

Why is there a mechanic for your mother

why is there a mechanic for ruining everyone’s round if I’m going to get banned for ruining everyone’s round