Bottom post of the previous page:
Forum poster newbie makes shitty thread title
Istoprocent1 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 4:36 pm Baseless claims. I have been to the vault minimum of 38 times, how many suicides?
"Nice, said the hangman and pulled the lever.sinfulbliss wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2023 9:20 pm
COST OF CHASING TIDERS: TIME, EFFORT, POSSIBLE LOSS OF POSSESSIONS (IF YOU'RE A NOOB LIKE SEAL)
GAIN OF CHASING TIDERS: ???
COST OF CHASING ANTAGONISTS: YOU MIGHT DIE
GAIN OF CHASING ANTAGONISTS: THE SURVIVAL OF THE STATION AND ITS CREW, GAMERGEAR, EPIC BATTLES
Only COWARDS focus on tiders because they're AFRAID of engaging ACTUAL threats.
kieth4 wrote: infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo
There is a lot of very bizarre nonsense being talked on this forum. I shall now remain silent and logoff until my points are vindicated.
Player who complainted over being killed for looting cap office wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2023 1:33 am Hey there, I'm Virescent, the super evil person who made the stupid appeal and didn't think it through enough. Just came here to say: screech, retards. Screech and writhe like the worms you are. Your pathetic little cries will keep echoing around for a while before quietting down. There is one great outcome from this: I rised up the blood pressure of some of you shitheads and lowered your lifespan. I'm honestly tempted to do this more often just to see you screech and writhe more, but that wouldn't be cool of me. So come on haters, show me some more of your high blood pressure please.
Big condolences from me fren because it really sucks to lose friends in a community where some get pushed out and some stay inside, make sure to stay in contact with them wherever they go (could still be ss13 community). You'll find new peeps here to hang with in time.c4g wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 8:06 pm i hope im next at this point. i havent even done anything but i hope they find something to get me banned. make something up for all i care. if they're gonna go down the line banning deadminning and blacklisting all my friends then whats the fucking point of being here. waiting to see who's next to go? hanging out with everyone celebrating them being gone? i fucking hate this
yup pretty sadc4g wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 8:06 pm i hope im next at this point. i havent even done anything but i hope they find something to get me banned. make something up for all i care. if they're gonna go down the line banning deadminning and blacklisting all my friends then whats the fucking point of being here. waiting to see who's next to go? hanging out with everyone celebrating them being gone? i fucking hate this
But will sinful get banned on shiptest for pen theft?
I'm gonna carry on as I always do, but it does make me ask:Kendrickorium wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 8:26 pm
if i'm missing any info here feel free to clear it up for me otherwise i'll see yall when the red names are gone
MrStonedOne wrote:I always read dendy's walls of text
it's not, but either we get security that justice was served or the people that were removed should agree justice was served. The fact there's a disagreement says we need to look at the evidence. The people removed say they were removed unfairly, offer their side of the story, but don't want the admin team to show what they have? Because it would be personal? Do you see the cactus I'm punching right now?dendydoom wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 8:41 pm im on the fence about sharing leaked messages from the discord. people want answers and proof but i said as much back when the manuel metagang was banned: it feels weird to air dirty laundry like that from what is most likely a personal place where very personal conversations happened.
is it right to then just dump all that in a public space and let people feed on it just to get naysayers and critics off our back? i'm not so sure.
Okay before you dm me who are you
yes, those are good points - thank you for sharing. i imagine all that you can really do if you're dead set on releasing evidence is to edit it down to only the most absolutely relevant parts. but then again, what of the people that it supposedly targets? is it fair to them to be dragged into the middle of all of this? it may well be very uncomfortable for them.Armhulen wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 8:48 pm If I trust one side, people went way too far with the bones they had to pick and started bullying and harrassing people out of the server. If I trust the other, someone just got copped for private opinions aired where they weren't meant to be. You know what the difference is? What people actually typed and sent in that private discord. "I hate x" is an opinion and voiced dislike, "I'm going to make life as painful for x as I can while i'm in this community" is a completely different thing that feeds into ongoing harrassment. Only way I personally can say whether it's the former or the latter is based off of what I see because even sorting that is subjective. All we can hope is that the majority sees the evidence and says "it made sense two people got blacklisted" because otherwise that's a big problem
it's not, but either we get security that justice was served or the people that were removed should agree justice was served. The fact there's a disagreement says we need to look at the evidence. The people removed say they were removed unfairly, offer their side of the story, but don't want the admin team to show what they have? Because it would be personal? Do you see the cactus I'm punching right now?dendydoom wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 8:41 pm im on the fence about sharing leaked messages from the discord. people want answers and proof but i said as much back when the manuel metagang was banned: it feels weird to air dirty laundry like that from what is most likely a personal place where very personal conversations happened.
is it right to then just dump all that in a public space and let people feed on it just to get naysayers and critics off our back? i'm not so sure.
MrStonedOne wrote:I always read dendy's walls of text
i'm pretty sure at this point that the harsh reality is that what this boils down to is some purple names being friends with red namesdendydoom wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 9:02 pmyes, those are good points - thank you for sharing. i imagine all that you can really do if you're dead set on releasing evidence is to edit it down to only the most absolutely relevant parts. but then again, what of the people that it supposedly targets? is it fair to them to be dragged into the middle of all of this? it may well be very uncomfortable for them.Armhulen wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 8:48 pm If I trust one side, people went way too far with the bones they had to pick and started bullying and harrassing people out of the server. If I trust the other, someone just got copped for private opinions aired where they weren't meant to be. You know what the difference is? What people actually typed and sent in that private discord. "I hate x" is an opinion and voiced dislike, "I'm going to make life as painful for x as I can while i'm in this community" is a completely different thing that feeds into ongoing harrassment. Only way I personally can say whether it's the former or the latter is based off of what I see because even sorting that is subjective. All we can hope is that the majority sees the evidence and says "it made sense two people got blacklisted" because otherwise that's a big problem
it's not, but either we get security that justice was served or the people that were removed should agree justice was served. The fact there's a disagreement says we need to look at the evidence. The people removed say they were removed unfairly, offer their side of the story, but don't want the admin team to show what they have? Because it would be personal? Do you see the cactus I'm punching right now?dendydoom wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 8:41 pm im on the fence about sharing leaked messages from the discord. people want answers and proof but i said as much back when the manuel metagang was banned: it feels weird to air dirty laundry like that from what is most likely a personal place where very personal conversations happened.
is it right to then just dump all that in a public space and let people feed on it just to get naysayers and critics off our back? i'm not so sure.
the harsh reality of this is that it's also not a ban that any admin can place - it's a blacklist by the host that's unappealable. i feel like this changes things somewhat. whatever is released is only to sate people's curiosity, because this doesn't follow the procedure of an admin applying a ban which can then be overturned or appealed if it's found to be made incorrectly or on poor evidence. this can't be overturned by anyone but the host.
What the hell did you think you've been doing here? What has anyone been doing in these peanut threads outside of celebrating that they can conform to some ultimately meaningless rules better than the banned user? Anyone who says that peanuts are a needed organ of some abstract community concept is lying through their ass. The peanut exists because you have no better way to entertain yourself than to enter a thread titled "ESCAL8TON NUT L E L" and to spend 3 minutes composing some reply to the effect of "This dumbass has no self control in the gaze of the admin!" or "AD(OLF)MIN L E L". The door is always open, but you don't leave? Mayhaps I shall extrapolate these conditions to accuse you of lacking the ability to live a life of just, or perchance I mayhaps wear the face of a loved one and tell you that you need to sort yourself out GOODBYE GOODBYE. Oh but I cant leave what about my metafriends awww my metalfriends?!? AKTLY thats speak for aktually also known as haha i am taking the piss out of you. AKTLY if you cant justify wasting 6-8 hours a week on flame wars by any other name for a pfp then your a sociopath or a child okay. Y U SO MAD LEL.
Lower your tone with me if your tracked play time doesn't look like this:Timonk wrote:You have clearly never seen his dickWesoda25 wrote:Genuinely think they should be blacklisted.
Flatulent wrote:of course you can change religion doing it while islamic however makes you lose your head from happiness
FAIRLY sure it was an ADMIN who sometimes coded on the side that removed him
holy shit.. an original work of artCapsandi wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 9:20 pmWhat the hell did you think you've been doing here? What has anyone been doing in these peanut threads outside of celebrating that they can conform to some ultimately meaningless rules better than the banned user? Anyone who says that peanuts are a needed organ of some abstract community concept is lying through their ass. The peanut exists because you have no better way to entertain yourself than to enter a thread titled "ESCAL8TON NUT L E L" and to spend 3 minutes composing some reply to the effect of "This dumbass has no self control in the gaze of the admin!" or "AD(OLF)MIN L E L". The door is always open, but you don't leave? Mayhaps I shall extrapolate these conditions to accuse you of lacking the ability to live a life of just, or perchance I mayhaps wear the face of a loved one and tell you that you need to sort yourself out GOODBYE GOODBYE. Oh but I cant leave what about my metafriends awww my metalfriends?!? AKTLY thats speak for aktually also known as haha i am taking the piss out of you. AKTLY if you cant justify wasting 6-8 hours a week on flame wars by any other name for a pfp then your a sociopath or a child okay. Y U SO MAD LEL.
LEL. I remember when I used to have conversations with people who didn't lie to themselves constantly in the pursuit of happiness. Are you happy?
The TG station social construct or "Community" not to be confused with the world outside your head in which no such thing exists, is... well, its a grouping of people- well, nobody belongs to it themselves so its not actually a group. Even if you can't find bespoke members of the group, you can still interpolate from common attributes of those who can be in a group. Therefore we know that the tg station community in your mind doesnt want to be happy.
Um AKTLY cap&sand I you fool this is projection.
Forte' my social construct friend my partaking in these threads cannot be construed as anything but the same reasons others do, but realize that I came here originally for the actually existing concept of the /tg/station project to which I used firstly to learn git and secondly to make sure my auditory sense is palpable to a wide audience. I remember when I suffered a misconception once, but I didn't double down. I didn't claw through a muddy cliff face telling myself there was a world unseen on the other end. I ate a three course meal of my pride and got back to the beaten path. And If I must claw through a cliff face it shall be for equally unverifiable but entirely valid reasons according to that concept which is I. Thats just the problem with people these days. I consider the rest of my time spent here as idle entertainment and ascribe to it no more weight than that. If we were to do some childish number crunching I could say that I paid MSO 30 - 40 bucks in bitcoin I couldn't use, and donated 10 bucks to charity for what i got out of it, and thats alright. I dont need to be justified by /tg/station, or in the eyes of a profile pic. I need not be happy for I know myself, more than any gauge of healthy mentality could, and thus I am justified as long as I conform to that concept of myself. did you see that? Whether its the project or this textbox its entertainment in the end, so stop being so seariuz. You think I really care about the hut? or.. whatever else idk what ive put my chips on. I was here because I was skimming the tools I - you know what im done with writing for today so uh, candlejack, I'll see you gu
it looks like what comes out when you repeatedly tap the word suggestions on imessageKendrickorium wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 9:24 pmholy shit.. an original work of artCapsandi wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 9:20 pmWhat the hell did you think you've been doing here? What has anyone been doing in these peanut threads outside of celebrating that they can conform to some ultimately meaningless rules better than the banned user? Anyone who says that peanuts are a needed organ of some abstract community concept is lying through their ass. The peanut exists because you have no better way to entertain yourself than to enter a thread titled "ESCAL8TON NUT L E L" and to spend 3 minutes composing some reply to the effect of "This dumbass has no self control in the gaze of the admin!" or "AD(OLF)MIN L E L". The door is always open, but you don't leave? Mayhaps I shall extrapolate these conditions to accuse you of lacking the ability to live a life of just, or perchance I mayhaps wear the face of a loved one and tell you that you need to sort yourself out GOODBYE GOODBYE. Oh but I cant leave what about my metafriends awww my metalfriends?!? AKTLY thats speak for aktually also known as haha i am taking the piss out of you. AKTLY if you cant justify wasting 6-8 hours a week on flame wars by any other name for a pfp then your a sociopath or a child okay. Y U SO MAD LEL.
LEL. I remember when I used to have conversations with people who didn't lie to themselves constantly in the pursuit of happiness. Are you happy?
The TG station social construct or "Community" not to be confused with the world outside your head in which no such thing exists, is... well, its a grouping of people- well, nobody belongs to it themselves so its not actually a group. Even if you can't find bespoke members of the group, you can still interpolate from common attributes of those who can be in a group. Therefore we know that the tg station community in your mind doesnt want to be happy.
Um AKTLY cap&sand I you fool this is projection.
Forte' my social construct friend my partaking in these threads cannot be construed as anything but the same reasons others do, but realize that I came here originally for the actually existing concept of the /tg/station project to which I used firstly to learn git and secondly to make sure my auditory sense is palpable to a wide audience. I remember when I suffered a misconception once, but I didn't double down. I didn't claw through a muddy cliff face telling myself there was a world unseen on the other end. I ate a three course meal of my pride and got back to the beaten path. And If I must claw through a cliff face it shall be for equally unverifiable but entirely valid reasons according to that concept which is I. Thats just the problem with people these days. I consider the rest of my time spent here as idle entertainment and ascribe to it no more weight than that. If we were to do some childish number crunching I could say that I paid MSO 30 - 40 bucks in bitcoin I couldn't use, and donated 10 bucks to charity for what i got out of it, and thats alright. I dont need to be justified by /tg/station, or in the eyes of a profile pic. I need not be happy for I know myself, more than any gauge of healthy mentality could, and thus I am justified as long as I conform to that concept of myself. did you see that? Whether its the project or this textbox its entertainment in the end, so stop being so seariuz. You think I really care about the hut? or.. whatever else idk what ive put my chips on. I was here because I was skimming the tools I - you know what im done with writing for today so uh, candlejack, I'll see you gu
Istoprocent1 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 4:36 pm Baseless claims. I have been to the vault minimum of 38 times, how many suicides?
They could always send the evidence to their pals to share or something.
thehogshotgun wrote:How does having jannies like you, who have more brain tumor than brain benefit the server
I swear every time I open this thread you've added an additional thing to your profile picture. It was just one beard, then a hat, then another hat.
c4g wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 8:06 pm i hope im next at this point. i havent even done anything but i hope they find something to get me banned. make something up for all i care. if they're gonna go down the line banning deadminning and blacklisting all my friends then whats the fucking point of being here. waiting to see who's next to go? hanging out with everyone celebrating them being gone? i fucking hate this
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
im a fan of cutting people who do targeted bullying and harassment but im retired and have a bigger trust of the current admin team for itiwishforducks wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 10:06 pm i can't say i've been a huge fan of the slash-and-burn vibes i've been getting these past few months and more.
idk i kind of lost a lot of trust ever since the cat metacomm bans. those just seemed a little out of proportion. i have a hard time taking "targeted bullying and harassment" at its word; i'd rather make my own opinion on it and see for myself. but alas i have yet to be able to make that opinionkinnebian wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 10:07 pmim a fan of cutting people who do targeted bullying and harassment but im retired and have a bigger trust of the current admin team for itiwishforducks wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 10:06 pm i can't say i've been a huge fan of the slash-and-burn vibes i've been getting these past few months and more.
Well, for this kind of thing there might not be evidence of their innocence. Allow me to give an example: Bob is accusing Mary of sending a discord message saying "I hate cats." Mary says that she never sent a message like that. How exactly can Mary prove that she never sent that message? As far as I can tell, the only way would be to somehow give pull full access to her discord history, so people can comb through it and confirm that the message isn't there. Obviously that isn't feasible. Bob, meanwhile, can easily provide evidence just by showing the one message that says "I hate cats."
this is a retarded analogy please come back with a better oneGPeckman wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 10:21 pmWell, for this kind of thing there might not be evidence of their innocence. Allow me to give an example: Bob is accusing Mary of sending a discord message saying "I hate cats." Mary says that she never sent a message like that. How exactly can Mary prove that she never sent that message? As far as I can tell, the only way would be to somehow give pull full access to her discord history, so people can comb through it and confirm that the message isn't there. Obviously that isn't feasible. Bob, meanwhile, can easily provide evidence just by showing the one message that says "I hate cats."
Alright then, fuck analogies. What if Sinful says "I never sent a message saying I wanted to cause admin burnout." How, exactly, could he prove it to you? What actions taken would be sufficient? If you can't think of any actions, or the actions are infeasible like "sending his entire discord history," then it means that Sinful can't prove his own innocence.
this isn't a fuckin court; its an extremely open-ended roleplaying game. if someone sucks we have every right to boot them out and tell them to fuck off forever. that they lasted as long as they did is a mercy they did nothing to earn.GPeckman wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 10:30 pmAlright then, fuck analogies. What if Sinful says "I never sent a message saying I wanted to cause admin burnout." How, exactly, could he prove it to you? What actions taken would be sufficient? If you can't think of any actions, or the actions are infeasible like "sending his entire discord history," then it means that Sinful can't prove his own innocence.
its not about proving your own innocence its about proving their guiltGPeckman wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 10:30 pmAlright then, fuck analogies. What if Sinful says "I never sent a message saying I wanted to cause admin burnout." How, exactly, could he prove it to you? What actions taken would be sufficient? If you can't think of any actions, or the actions are infeasible like "sending his entire discord history," then it means that Sinful can't prove his own innocence.
They can try. Jackrip was also blacklisted, right? I remember him making multiple attempts at appeals.
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 9:16 pm I highly doubt any other admin on the team would have given you this chance, except maybe Kieth because his brain worms are almost as bad as mine.
Vekter wrote: ↑Tue May 16, 2023 4:45 pm At what point does someone's refusal or failure to improve become malice in and of itself? If you give someone a year to stop shitting on the carpet and they keep doing it but get slightly closer to the bathroom every time and sometimes they get to the toilet before it happens, at what point does it become acceptable to just ask them to go shit in someone else's house?
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 7:00 pm I'm sorry, can we get a real player to resolve this appeal? I don't like this trial player. They can't even set their own name.
sinfulbliss wrote: ↑I almost prefer Rave's AI-generated "We cannot accept this appeal at this time. If you would like assistance appealing in the future, please dial 1-800-1984-1488."
Pandarsenic wrote: ↑Mon Dec 12, 2022 2:25 pm I think we can all agree that someone throwing a reverse revolver at Zyb as a secret test of character, and Zyb immediately fucking himself with it, is the best thing we all could have received for Christmas this year
I'm aware of that. I originally responded to NoxVS, who suggested that Sinful try to prove his own innocence. I was pointing out that this isn't really possible to do. If you're upset about people suggesting that Sinful should prove his own innocence, then go yell at NoxVS!
A headmin said that "more information is coming," so I'll withhold judgement until then.
This isn't really about Sinfulbliss and Pepper sucking in general. This is about a very specific accusation; that Sinful and Pepper conspired over discord to make admins burn out.Atlanta-Ned wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 10:32 pm this isn't a fuckin court; its an extremely open-ended roleplaying game. if someone sucks we have every right to boot them out and tell them to fuck off forever. that they lasted as long as they did is a mercy they did nothing to earn.
As much as people sometimes use them to rile each other up over their own bitter feelings and burnout until it spills over into getting themselves banned... it's completely normal to want to hang out with people you have met and become your friends and stay in contact with them outside the medium of a weird roleplaying game.datorangebottle wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 10:49 pm Anyway, at what point do we start admitting that non-tg discords explicitly for talking about tg with people from tg are inherently metacords worth dissolving?
There shouldn't be a manuel discord, a sybil discord, etc. tg discord exists. Some kind people patiently explained to me the backstory for the manuel one; I still think it shouldn't exist.
Trying to police the creation of discords that are not official and talk about /tg/station13 will have the same effectiveness on actually stopping metacords as the american prohibition era had on alcoholdatorangebottle wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 10:49 pmAnyway, at what point do we start admitting that non-tg discords explicitly for talking about tg with people from tg are inherently metacords worth dissolving?
after getting those same details, I can say that a blacklist is way too harsh (again, if they are true), a permaban would fit better but it is what it isKendrickorium wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 8:26 pmyup pretty sadc4g wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 8:06 pm i hope im next at this point. i havent even done anything but i hope they find something to get me banned. make something up for all i care. if they're gonna go down the line banning deadminning and blacklisting all my friends then whats the fucking point of being here. waiting to see who's next to go? hanging out with everyone celebrating them being gone? i fucking hate this
MSO is known for making quick decision banning so i don't even blame him
after getting some details from sinful i can say that (if these details are true) that the current headmin team is absolutely fucking bonkers.
like spending hours of their time digging up enough information to ban people because they are literal fucking drama vampires bonkers. (this includes the recent admin deadminning and sun catton permaing)
literally none of this is as bad as vekter or any purple name says it is.
Armhulen wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 10:59 pmTrying to police the creation of discords that are not official and talk about /tg/station13 will have the same effectiveness on actually stopping metacords as the american prohibition era had on alcoholdatorangebottle wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 10:49 pmAnyway, at what point do we start admitting that non-tg discords explicitly for talking about tg with people from tg are inherently metacords worth dissolving?
https://factrepublic.com/facts/35808/ wrote:Prohibition agent Izzy Einstein bragged that he could find liquor in any city in under 30 minutes. In Chicago it took him 21 minutes. In Atlanta 17 minutes, and Pittsburg just 11 minutes. But New Orleans set the record of 35 seconds. Einstein asked his taxi driver where to get a drink, and the driver handed him one.
The Spessmen Times wrote:Prohibition agent Sam Salamander bragged that he could find a metacord in any server in under 30 minutes. In Bagil it took him 21 minutes. In Sybil 17 minutes, and Manuel just 11 minutes. But Terry set the record of 35 seconds. Sam asked an assistant on the arrivals shuttle where to get a discord invite, and the assistant linked him one.
Users browsing this forum: EmpressMaia, GPeckman