Moderator: In-Game Head Admins
[10:55 AM] spookydonut: stonedmc is the work of a criminally insane mad genius
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
paprika wrote:This is for admins in the context of in-game or FNR administrating, as in handling ban cases, not moderating FNR which is elyina's second job. He was enforcing rules that HBL put in place whether you like it or not, your hate is extremely misguided.
You can't eat the orange, and throw the peel away - a man is not a piece of fruit.
oranges wrote:has feedback in their thread deleted, apparently gets to pick and choose what feedback they get, claims most of the original feedback was "worthless"
suspicious behaviour in general, tries to avoid their own history, claims it was all misrepresentation and refuses to admit wrongdoing.
oranges wrote:the retraction was posted in the thread, removing feedback has rarely been done before, I don't see why you need to supress the original complaint, which was ironically about them having feedback moved out of their thread.
You can admire the parallels
oranges wrote:has feedback in their thread deleted, apparently gets to pick and choose what feedback they get, claims most of the original feedback was "worthless"
suspicious behaviour in general, tries to avoid their own history, claims it was all misrepresentation and refuses to admit wrongdoing.
Stickymayhem wrote:you're right!
Lazengann wrote:I stand by it
Stickymayhem wrote:Lazengann wrote:I stand by it
And yet it's entirely wrong.
4 year old hate from a poorly enforced era of administration would understandably be irrelevant today.
It does immediately provide a negative image rather unfairly.
Stickymayhem wrote:Lazengann wrote:I stand by it
And yet it's entirely wrong.
4 year old hate from a poorly enforced era of administration would understandably be irrelevant today.
It does immediately provide a negative image rather unfairly.
elyina wrote:if you think the removal of feedback from 4 years ago that was in the wrong section to begin with is trying to cover something up you're either beyond help or just posting in bad faith which i will not even engage with.
elyina wrote:37 btw
Incomptinence wrote:The kind of cosseted admin that convinces me that my initial impression of the several over reaches in forum moderation to protect admins from peanut gallery posting and actual feedback in other areas of FNR was a grave mistake.
I simply don't see any value in them that justifies such measures to protect it or any way they or their rulings would warrant respect.
Cutting to the point trying to turn naming policy something I have opposed personally into voldemorting the drat removed name and functionally making it forbidden to type IC for "Abiding by an admins ruling" is as ridiculous as killing an assistant for writing "hitler" on a piece of paper.
Nilons wrote:Seems extremely petty, harsh, and mean spirited in their application of the rules. I hope they change and take a good look at whether they're banning to make the server better before a trio of headmins that doesn't protect other admins at all costs regardless of quality comes in
Dax Dupont wrote:Needs to be harder on shitters tbh
wesoda25 wrote:Dax Dupont wrote:Needs to be harder on shitters tbh
You couldn’t possibly be referring to me, could you?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests