rock permanent secban peanut

General SS13 Chat
Post Reply
User avatar
Shadowflame909
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:18 pm
Byond Username: Shadowflame909
Reddit Username: Shadowmist909
Location: Think about something witty and pretend I put it here

Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Shadowflame909 » #565974

So they gib people like normal cult, for wizard tier powers? Shadowling ascension?

I honestly have no clue if it was deserved to yeet their tools until I know how OP they get

But from rocks explanation, they do sound kinda OP ngl
[youtube]38VBv0ZenZU[/youtube]
Spoiler:
Image
ThanatosRa wrote:My biggest problem is that I can't fix any of this.
Boris wrote:shadowflame either has a brain the size of a pea or one the size of the moon and he's playing 58D chess.
BeeSting12 wrote:please write an apology to this forums, this community, the host, and the internet as a whole for the data storage space you wasted with this complaint.
BebeYoshi wrote:Saltyflame909
Cobby wrote:The trash bin... have you lost your way home anon?
User avatar
Kingtrin
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 12:29 am
Byond Username: Kingtrin

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Kingtrin » #565977

I understand manuels in an odd spot but raves ruling is really hard to swallow. Granted there was no note, but saying a jaunting-gibbing mini wizard deserves another chance to wreck havoc is really odd and not what i expected from rule 6. Do manuel regulars want antags like heretics to be given second chances if they get caught out "early"? And what does that look like from an enforcement standpoint?

Also rave says this is not a case that should be precedent setting but holy hell manuel needs more precedents in order to clarify these situations. If you walk out of this case without a clear ruling you can expect abuse and confusion.
User avatar
Shadowflame909
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:18 pm
Byond Username: Shadowflame909
Reddit Username: Shadowmist909
Location: Think about something witty and pretend I put it here

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Shadowflame909 » #565979

I mean you can literally kill nightmares, nukeops, wizards and blob with no care on manuel

So if this antag is at that level of "Oh shit if I don't kill you you'll kill me" then they just might need to be added to the murderbone central policy. (and then get removed from manuel rotation for being another no-rp antag)
[youtube]38VBv0ZenZU[/youtube]
Spoiler:
Image
ThanatosRa wrote:My biggest problem is that I can't fix any of this.
Boris wrote:shadowflame either has a brain the size of a pea or one the size of the moon and he's playing 58D chess.
BeeSting12 wrote:please write an apology to this forums, this community, the host, and the internet as a whole for the data storage space you wasted with this complaint.
BebeYoshi wrote:Saltyflame909
Cobby wrote:The trash bin... have you lost your way home anon?
User avatar
Cobby
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Cobby » #565987

rave should have spawned the heretic book in the evidence lockers rather than on the person if they cared about upholding the no delete bit, which I think is fine for manuel. It's still fairly new, so admins should err on the side that people dont know what the role needs/has/etc.

really though there should be a way to replicate the book (if there isnt already) so your victory isnt tied directly to 1 item. having to get admins involved over this is a bit of an ugly solution.
Voted best trap in /tg/ 2014-current
User avatar
BONERMASTER
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2018 2:28 pm
Byond Username: BONERMASTER

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by BONERMASTER » #565990

The entire admin team is in shambles.
Twottle_Birb responding to jannies in his ban appeal, wrote:at least im not a faggot lol Image
ARE YOU sick and tired of hearing "appeal denied" OR having your tickets closed with "IC issue"? Just claim harrassment under frcp 30(d), and file an administrative complaint, together with us!
BONERMASTER & Associates, your number one choice for any successful ban appeal trial and administrative complaint!
BONERMASTER & Associates will not be held responsible for any loss of life, financial ruin, bodily and mental harm, or any conceivable damage directly or collateral that may be sustained during a partnership with BONERMASTER & Associates.
BONERMASTER & Associates retain their right to terminate representation at any time and be fully compensated for any financial loss suffered in these instances by the party entering the agreement.
User avatar
RaveRadbury
In-Game Head Admin
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2019 3:41 am
Byond Username: RaveRadbury
Github Username: RaveRadbury
Location: BK ChatZone
Contact:

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by RaveRadbury » #565991

Cobby wrote:rave should have spawned the heretic book in the evidence lockers rather than on the person if they cared about upholding the no delete bit, which I think is fine for manuel.
This is the mistake I made. He also needed the heart, but yeah, I should have spawned them in an evidence locker. Thank you for pointing this out, Cobby.
User avatar
Shadowflame909
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:18 pm
Byond Username: Shadowflame909
Reddit Username: Shadowmist909
Location: Think about something witty and pretend I put it here

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Shadowflame909 » #565992

Cobby wrote:rave should have spawned the heretic book in the evidence lockers rather than on the person if they cared about upholding the no delete bit, which I think is fine for manuel. It's still fairly new, so admins should err on the side that people dont know what the role needs/has/etc.

really though there should be a way to replicate the book (if there isnt already) so your victory isnt tied directly to 1 item. having to get admins involved over this is a bit of an ugly solution.
It is kind of funny though

Imagine being able to stop the wizard by shove stunning them, taking their spellbook from their backpack and chucking it into space.

No spells without your tome nerd
[youtube]38VBv0ZenZU[/youtube]
Spoiler:
Image
ThanatosRa wrote:My biggest problem is that I can't fix any of this.
Boris wrote:shadowflame either has a brain the size of a pea or one the size of the moon and he's playing 58D chess.
BeeSting12 wrote:please write an apology to this forums, this community, the host, and the internet as a whole for the data storage space you wasted with this complaint.
BebeYoshi wrote:Saltyflame909
Cobby wrote:The trash bin... have you lost your way home anon?
User avatar
RaveRadbury
In-Game Head Admin
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2019 3:41 am
Byond Username: RaveRadbury
Github Username: RaveRadbury
Location: BK ChatZone
Contact:

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by RaveRadbury » #565995

Cobby wrote:really though there should be a way to replicate the book (if there isnt already) so your victory isnt tied directly to 1 item. having to get admins involved over this is a bit of an ugly solution.
Is there a way to replicate the heart that I am not aware of?
User avatar
wesoda25
In-Game Admin Trainer
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2017 9:32 pm
Byond Username: Wesoda25

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by wesoda25 » #565996

h-h-h-h-hugbox
Image
User avatar
bobbahbrown
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2014 1:04 am
Byond Username: Bobbahbrown
Location: canada
Contact:

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by bobbahbrown » #565997

RaveRadbury wrote:
Cobby wrote:really though there should be a way to replicate the book (if there isnt already) so your victory isnt tied directly to 1 item. having to get admins involved over this is a bit of an ugly solution.
Is there a way to replicate the heart that I am not aware of?
you can make new hearts with a ritual on a rune, but you'd need the rune to begin with

its like a poppy and a normal heart i think iirc
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

The information contained in this post is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you received this post in error, please notify the sender by reply post and delete and destroy the message.

L’information contenue dans ce message est destinée exclusivement aux personnes ou aux entités auxquelles le message est adressé. Le contenu de ce message (y compris toute pièce jointe) peut renfermer de l’information confidentielle et / ou privilégiée. Si ce message ne vous est pas destiné, vous ne pouvez utiliser, divulguer, diffuser, copier ou imprimer son contenu. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez aviser l’expéditeur en lui faisant parvenir une réponse. De plus, veuillez supprimer et détruire le message.
Tlaltecuhtli
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Tlaltecuhtli » #565998

hogbox, traitor got found out for doing traitor things then he ahelps to his admin buddy to get his antag tools back
confused rock
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 12:18 am
Byond Username: The unloved rock

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by confused rock » #565999

Shadowflame909 wrote: Imagine being able to stop the wizard by shove stunning them, taking their spellbook from their backpack and chucking it into space.
No spells without your tome nerd
I mean you can take their hat!

I would've been absolutely fuming if james was running around jaunting and gibbing people before we arrested him, but he gained those powers like 5 minutes after being released. after those he was impossible to stop without lethal force and he would continue to gib people and grow in power, but apparently I was validhunting for repeatedly trying to kill him as a security officer, the ones who the rules we stole from goon say are supposed to validhunt?
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
saprasam
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2018 11:42 pm
Byond Username: Saprasam

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by saprasam » #566005

if you play manuel and dont expect stupid boinks i feel like you're stupid
Image
(FORMER) tgmc admin (I HAVE REGAINED MY HUMAN RIGHTS)
User avatar
Stickymayhem
In-Game Admin
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:13 pm
Byond Username: Stickymayhem

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Stickymayhem » #566010

Yeah I'm going to do my best to not let this become the norm on Manuel we aren't fucking baystation
Image
Image
Boris wrote:Sticky is a jackass who has worms where his brain should be, but he also gets exactly what SS13 should be
Super Aggro Crag wrote: Wed Oct 13, 2021 6:17 pm Dont engage with sticky he's a subhuman
User avatar
RaveRadbury
In-Game Head Admin
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2019 3:41 am
Byond Username: RaveRadbury
Github Username: RaveRadbury
Location: BK ChatZone
Contact:

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by RaveRadbury » #566011

Stickymayhem wrote:Yeah I'm going to do my best to not let this become the norm on Manuel we aren't fucking baystation
You might want to actually play and admin on Manuel then.
BrianBackslide
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2020 10:43 am
Byond Username: BrianBackslide

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by BrianBackslide » #566014

Was watching the experience as an observer and, while the round was hilarious with Mooney constantly getting friendly fired, I pointed out in dchat that having the antag tied to an item they can't get back if they didn't get set up first is plain bad design. There's already rules for deleting traitor objective items such as the hypospray, and the disk outright cannot be destroyed or leave the station, so naturally this rule should apply since the Heretic items can't be recovered. Rave is in the right here regarding this.

On the other hand, from an RP stand point, Rock is ALSO in the right for feeling the need to destroy dangerous items. Nobody is familiar enough with the new antag (and it's arguably meta to know everything about every antag) to know whether there is a way to get those items back through a recall ability like Wizards can.

On the other OTHER hand, you don't need to look far to find headmin rulings stating over and over ad-nauseum that antag rounds are not sacred. Otherwise every Manuel main would be drowning in antag tokens from all those "Manuel Moments."

I think this boils down to a grey area that should have been addressed through better design decisions for this new antag. I think that being able to deep-fry EVERYTHING is also something that might need to be looked at.

What I want to know is, if the items were destroyed in the cremator/chucked into lava/space, would the decision have been made different? It's arguably higher RP than "lul i deep fry and ated it."
User avatar
Cobby
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Cobby » #566016

RaveRadbury wrote:
Cobby wrote:really though there should be a way to replicate the book (if there isnt already) so your victory isnt tied directly to 1 item. having to get admins involved over this is a bit of an ugly solution.
Is there a way to replicate the heart that I am not aware of?
acting like i keep up with features :roll:

still have only played 1 time with families, and not even as a member. not sure if it's a blessing or a curse.
Voted best trap in /tg/ 2014-current
User avatar
Stickymayhem
In-Game Admin
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:13 pm
Byond Username: Stickymayhem

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Stickymayhem » #566018

RaveRadbury wrote:
Stickymayhem wrote:Yeah I'm going to do my best to not let this become the norm on Manuel we aren't fucking baystation
You might want to actually play and admin on Manuel then.
Clearly not a prerequisite for good takes on Manuel
Image
Image
Boris wrote:Sticky is a jackass who has worms where his brain should be, but he also gets exactly what SS13 should be
Super Aggro Crag wrote: Wed Oct 13, 2021 6:17 pm Dont engage with sticky he's a subhuman
User avatar
RaveRadbury
In-Game Head Admin
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2019 3:41 am
Byond Username: RaveRadbury
Github Username: RaveRadbury
Location: BK ChatZone
Contact:

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by RaveRadbury » #566020

Stickymayhem wrote:
RaveRadbury wrote:
Stickymayhem wrote:Yeah I'm going to do my best to not let this become the norm on Manuel we aren't fucking baystation
You might want to actually play and admin on Manuel then.
Clearly not a prerequisite for good takes on Manuel
lol! :lol:
User avatar
Fikou
In-Game Admin Trainer
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2018 8:38 am
Byond Username: Fikou
Github Username: Fikou

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Fikou » #566021

admin help i was ARRESTED by SECURITY as ANTAG!! they took my STUFF and let me FREE. HOLY SHIT ADMIN. I CANNOT BELIEVE WHAT IS HAPPENING. PLEASE BAN THEM FOR RULE 6
confused rock
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 12:18 am
Byond Username: The unloved rock

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by confused rock » #566022

BrianBackslide wrote: What I want to know is, if the items were destroyed in the cremator/chucked into lava/space, would the decision have been made different? It's arguably higher RP than "lul i deep fry and ated it."
I sincerely hope not, because that would be a ridiculous reason to give him new items. Either way:

you're right, brian, that WOULD be higher rp, if you gave high rp examples. throwing something that isn't a corpse in the cremator? haphazardly adding more debris to the orbit? fucking lava? none of those are much better than frying it. Even if one of those was a good example it would be HIGH rp, but this isn't high rp, this is medium. Medium so that we can have people giving their effort to making interesting scenarios even if they're detached from reality. this is a station with a fucking clown on it which is occasionally hit by "meaty ores". Deep frying it and eating it in front of his face wasn't done to make sure he never got the item, if I wanted to do that I would've just hidden it in a satchel in a dorms locker or something. deep frying it and eating it in front of his face did nothing for me except paint me as a target for james if he wanted to get revenge. Is "this dude ATE a book and a heart RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME" going to kill your immersion when so much other bullshit exists?

REMEMBER KIDS WHEN JACK SAYS THAT I SPENT THE ENTIRE ROUND VALIDHUNTING A DANGEROUS ANTAGONIST AS SECURITY AND THAT HE DOESN'T THINK I SAID A SINGLE WORD TO JAMES THE ENTIRE ROUND IT'S NOT A FUCKING PEANUT POST
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Super Aggro Crag
In Game PermaBanned
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:47 pm
Byond Username: Super Aggro Crag

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Super Aggro Crag » #566023

why do you want to ruin rounds, confusedrock
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Tlaltecuhtli
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Tlaltecuhtli » #566025

BrianBackslide wrote: having the antag tied to an item they can't get back if they didn't get set up first is plain bad design. T"

ahelping when you lose your pda as traitor is bad design,
ahelping when you get caught by sec is bad design ,
ahelping when sec catches you with the hands in the jam and deleting your items instead of accepting the fact you lost is bad design
BrianBackslide
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2020 10:43 am
Byond Username: BrianBackslide

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by BrianBackslide » #566026

Incorrect. You can complete your objectives without those items as any antag that is not Heretic and Cultist. (Outside of stealing the nuke core, and I'm not sure if non-cultists can even destroy those knives)
The difference here is that Heretics cannot complete their objectives without their special items.

I also said that antag rounds aren't sacred. I agree that not taking the L when you were caught is dumb.
User avatar
Nabski
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 5:42 pm
Byond Username: Nabski
Github Username: Nabski89
Reddit Username: Nabski
Location: TN

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Nabski » #566029

Manuel is a shit server with shit rules that continue to be unevenly enforced many months later.

Says the guy who doesn't play on it because why would I willingly eat shit when I've got something good already.
User avatar
Armhulen
Global Moderator
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
Byond Username: Armhulenn
Github Username: bazelart

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Armhulen » #566031

I don't agree with the whole 30 minutes thing. The main content only goes for 60 minutes so you're already halfway there, and 90 minutes is supposed to be the cutoff for all content. Not really a fair goal to set your rounds to when considering how to handle a ticket.

The other thing I'd say is that this punishes rock for capturing the antagonist. I suggest in the future you create antags or pump midround ones to keep up the pace of the round, it will always tide over better.
Image Image Image
User avatar
RaveRadbury
In-Game Head Admin
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2019 3:41 am
Byond Username: RaveRadbury
Github Username: RaveRadbury
Location: BK ChatZone
Contact:

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by RaveRadbury » #566032

Armhulen wrote:I don't agree with the whole 30 minutes thing. The main content only goes for 60 minutes so you're already halfway there, and 90 minutes is supposed to be the cutoff for all content. Not really a fair goal to set your rounds to when considering how to handle a ticket.

The other thing I'd say is that this punishes rock for capturing the antagonist. I suggest in the future you create antags or pump midround ones to keep up the pace of the round, it will always tide over better.
I'll take all of this into consideration and I appreciate you taking time to weigh in.

When you say that I "punished Rock" do you mean that spawning in the items punished him, or that the ticket itself was a punishment? He did not receive a note for any of this.
User avatar
Armhulen
Global Moderator
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
Byond Username: Armhulenn
Github Username: bazelart

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Armhulen » #566033

RaveRadbury wrote:
Armhulen wrote:I don't agree with the whole 30 minutes thing. The main content only goes for 60 minutes so you're already halfway there, and 90 minutes is supposed to be the cutoff for all content. Not really a fair goal to set your rounds to when considering how to handle a ticket.

The other thing I'd say is that this punishes rock for capturing the antagonist. I suggest in the future you create antags or pump midround ones to keep up the pace of the round, it will always tide over better.
I'll take all of this into consideration and I appreciate you taking time to weigh in.

When you say that I "punished Rock" do you mean that spawning in the items punished him, or that the ticket itself was a punishment? He did not receive a note for any of this.
Rebounding the antag back into the game with his equipment would be what i'm referring to here, to a player it feels like they just weren't supposed to be conflicting with the guy yet or that because of their actions the guy gets a second chance where otherwise he wouldn't (especially when it's an arrest, not a murder it feels even worse)
Image Image Image
SkeletalElite
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:14 pm
Byond Username: SkeletalElite
Github Username: SkeletalElite

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by SkeletalElite » #566034

admin sec take my antag toy away ban he
User avatar
Armhulen
Global Moderator
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
Byond Username: Armhulenn
Github Username: bazelart

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Armhulen » #566035

SkeletalElite wrote:admin sec take my antag toy away ban he
shitpost all you please, you can't unfeedback rave all my useful tips
Image Image Image
SkeletalElite
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:14 pm
Byond Username: SkeletalElite
Github Username: SkeletalElite

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by SkeletalElite » #566036

Armhulen wrote:
SkeletalElite wrote:admin sec take my antag toy away ban he
shitpost all you please, you can't unfeedback rave all my useful tips
give them new antag tools or a way to acquire new antag tools sure, thats a problem with the gamemode, but none of that is rock's problem.

Edit: to clarify, rave should have acted as more of a "dungeon master" than a rule enforcer in this situation. Do something to the round to make it more interesting? Sure. Boink rock and tell him not to take away the antags stuff? Why?
User avatar
RaveRadbury
In-Game Head Admin
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2019 3:41 am
Byond Username: RaveRadbury
Github Username: RaveRadbury
Location: BK ChatZone
Contact:

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by RaveRadbury » #566039

Armhulen wrote:Rebounding the antag back into the game with his equipment would be what i'm referring to here, to a player it feels like they just weren't supposed to be conflicting with the guy yet or that because of their actions the guy gets a second chance where otherwise he wouldn't (especially when it's an arrest, not a murder it feels even worse)
Under different circumstances (such as solo Heretic rolling on dynamic) I would have noted Rock for what they did. So, I did think that they did something wrong. Sec protocol is to put contraband in the evidence locker (so I guess there's an MRP Rule 8 aspect as well). It's obviously so antags can try to get it back. One of Jame's "protect" goals was a sec officer, who he was having some cool dialogue with. There could have been a whole infiltration sequence to recover the item, but rock chose to break protocol because his character is a dick. "I could have hid it in my locker, or the evidence locker, but I chose instead to deep fry it and eat it in front of him" Only one of those choices is acceptable and we practically beg people on the wiki to do this stuff instead of qdel'ing or using antag toys as sec. We have systems in place with intentional flaws so there can be cat-and-mouse gameplay (like what ended up happening), not so that player's can ruin the round for everyone else for their own personal amusement.

I don't get what the deal with Rock's Buzzo-level behavior is, but it doesn't fit MRP's escalation-style.
User avatar
General Thrax
In-Game Admin
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:40 am
Byond Username: GeneralThrax
Location: mime planet

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by General Thrax » #566056

Pretty disappointed with how it turned out. Could've been handled less intrusively without contacting rock. Would've been more convenient to let the book-eating slide and just create more sources of conflict like Arm suggested instead of letting a captured antagonist get a second chance after being arrested.
User avatar
Reeeee
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2017 11:46 am
Byond Username: LibbySnow
Location: SPESS

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Reeeee » #566064

Manuel seems to collect these little stories of pure derp on purpose.

It needs it's own Gamemaster to set precedents, not a collective effort to peanut post every complaint after these incidents happen to salvage the most stupid combination of derp to cause more manuels later. You can't just let it skate along without a singular guiding entity or this will happen constantly.
Spoiler:
"i have prevented a evil man from achieving his goals non-violently"
*bwoink* "fuck you i'm giving his shit back"
"uh"
*bwoink* "Fuck you"
"why was i even notified"
*bwoink* "to fuck with your immersion because fuck you"
If rave would have been my GM IRL there would have been a wet willy and or a wedgie for being a bad GM who railroads shit FNR followed by an collective effort to kill his mary sue insert.
signnatrire
Jack7D1
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:00 am
Byond Username: Jack7D1

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Jack7D1 » #566065

I nominate Raveradbury head of manuel.
User avatar
Tarchonvaagh
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:30 pm
Byond Username: Tarchonvaagh

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Tarchonvaagh » #566067

Spicy
User avatar
NoxVS
In-Game Admin
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2018 7:43 pm
Byond Username: NoxVS

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by NoxVS » #566071

General Thrax wrote:Pretty disappointed with how it turned out. Could've been handled less intrusively without contacting rock. Would've been more convenient to let the book-eating slide and just create more sources of conflict like Arm suggested instead of letting a captured antagonist get a second chance after being arrested.
The issue was probably just that he decided to instantly deep fry and eat the items when the rest of security and command were going to talk to me. Any form of negotiation or interrogation or anything was ended right away. At the time I was providing a reason for what I was doing, I was justifying myself and trying to sway the other members of security to my side, you know, roleplaying. The reason why Manuel exists. To roleplay. While Rock thought it was engaging, I believe that talking to security and explaining myself would have been far more engaging for the rest of security than a person walking into the brig, immediately eating unobtainable items, and then saying "what'cha gonna do, bird boy?"

At the time of being given back the book and heart, I wasn't even captured. Security decided to implant me and throw me out of the brig once the roleplay opportunity was instead cancelled in favor of just eating the items without any other form of interaction. So it seems it was less a case of Rock being told to let an antagonist go and to ignore them entirely and more them being told not to silently deepfry and eat antag gear the moment you search someone and discover they are valid

Also, points awarded to the ghost in deadchat who predicted this all happening when they said I was fucked if I was doing RP stuff because Is-A-Lizard was playing security
The weak should fear the strong
thehogshotgun wrote:How does having jannies like you, who have more brain tumor than brain benefit the server
User avatar
General Thrax
In-Game Admin
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:40 am
Byond Username: GeneralThrax
Location: mime planet

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by General Thrax » #566077

NoxVS wrote:
General Thrax wrote:Pretty disappointed with how it turned out. Could've been handled less intrusively without contacting rock. Would've been more convenient to let the book-eating slide and just create more sources of conflict like Arm suggested instead of letting a captured antagonist get a second chance after being arrested.
The issue was probably just that he decided to instantly deep fry and eat the items when the rest of security and command were going to talk to me. Any form of negotiation or interrogation or anything was ended right away. At the time I was providing a reason for what I was doing, I was justifying myself and trying to sway the other members of security to my side, you know, roleplaying. The reason why Manuel exists. To roleplay. While Rock thought it was engaging, I believe that talking to security and explaining myself would have been far more engaging for the rest of security than a person walking into the brig, immediately eating unobtainable items, and then saying "what'cha gonna do, bird boy?"

At the time of being given back the book and heart, I wasn't even captured. Security decided to implant me and throw me out of the brig once the roleplay opportunity was instead cancelled in favor of just eating the items without any other form of interaction. So it seems it was less a case of Rock being told to let an antagonist go and to ignore them entirely and more them being told not to silently deepfry and eat antag gear the moment you search someone and discover they are valid

Also, points awarded to the ghost in deadchat who predicted this all happening when they said I was fucked if I was doing RP stuff because Is-A-Lizard was playing security
yeah that doesnt sound great i understand a bit more now
User avatar
saprasam
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2018 11:42 pm
Byond Username: Saprasam

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by saprasam » #566084

RaveRadbury wrote:
Stickymayhem wrote:Yeah I'm going to do my best to not let this become the norm on Manuel we aren't fucking baystation
You might want to actually play and admin on Manuel then.
this is a take that makes you look like a supreme faggot
it's the same thing as saying "when you code it"
Image
(FORMER) tgmc admin (I HAVE REGAINED MY HUMAN RIGHTS)
User avatar
Flatulent
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2019 8:36 am
Byond Username: FlatulentIndustrialist
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Flatulent » #566085

Manuel is big cringe and is nothing but a laughingstock because of hugbox administrative decisions
if you’re reading this please kindly suck my nuts
Mothblocks, winter 2021, “successfully” preventing bagil death with relevant data wrote:You seem to be under the fallacy that reinforcing that Bagil is a TDM shithole where you must carry bolas and spears on you at all times, while looking for the next valid to hunt down is a positive change to the server. I don't. The data suggests other people don't.
imsxz wrote:I give up there’s too many furries
cacogen wrote:i asked oranges how often he plays and he deleted the post
cybersaber101 wrote:Welp, you guys let a terrymin become a headmin, thousand years of darkness.
Vekter wrote:I jerk off Nist a bit too much but he's honestly one of the best silicon players on the server. B.O.R.G.O. is also pretty good.
User avatar
PKPenguin321
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 7:02 pm
Byond Username: PKPenguin321
Github Username: PKPenguin321
Location: U S A, U S A, U S A

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by PKPenguin321 » #566086

Flatulent wrote:Manuel is big cringe and is nothing but a laughingstock because of hugbox administrative decisions
first part no, it's actually pretty based
second part yeah, there's definitely a palpable air of tension when it comes to worrying about being bwoinked. killing someone, even as an antag, has gotta be at least 5x more stressful
i play Lauser McMauligan. clown name is Cold-Ass Honkey
i have three other top secret characters as well.
tell the best admin how good he is
Spoiler:
Image
User avatar
XivilaiAnaxes
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 7:13 am
Byond Username: XivilaiAnaxes

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by XivilaiAnaxes » #566088

Pointing out "why did you give the antag the tools directly of deleting them was the problem" was a "peanut post"

Fuck you Jannies
Stickymayhem wrote:Imagine the sheer narcisssim required to genuinely believe you are this intelligent.
User avatar
Shadowflame909
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:18 pm
Byond Username: Shadowflame909
Reddit Username: Shadowmist909
Location: Think about something witty and pretend I put it here

it good

Post by Shadowflame909 » #566090

I recommend everyone in this thread try peanut brittle unless you have a peanut allergy or hate peanuts

it good
[youtube]38VBv0ZenZU[/youtube]
Spoiler:
Image
ThanatosRa wrote:My biggest problem is that I can't fix any of this.
Boris wrote:shadowflame either has a brain the size of a pea or one the size of the moon and he's playing 58D chess.
BeeSting12 wrote:please write an apology to this forums, this community, the host, and the internet as a whole for the data storage space you wasted with this complaint.
BebeYoshi wrote:Saltyflame909
Cobby wrote:The trash bin... have you lost your way home anon?
User avatar
oranges
Code Maintainer
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
Byond Username: Optimumtact
Github Username: optimumtact
Reddit Username: msolikesass
Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by oranges » #566091

Stickymayhem wrote:Yeah I'm going to do my best to not let this become the norm on Manuel we aren't fucking baystation
You'd have to actually be active and unbanned from discord to do any of these things sticky
User avatar
oranges
Code Maintainer
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
Byond Username: Optimumtact
Github Username: optimumtact
Reddit Username: msolikesass
Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by oranges » #566092

Flatulent wrote:Manuel is big cringe and is nothing but a laughingstock because of hugbox administrative decisions
You must be glad you don't play there then
User avatar
Shadowflame909
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:18 pm
Byond Username: Shadowflame909
Reddit Username: Shadowmist909
Location: Think about something witty and pretend I put it here

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by Shadowflame909 » #566093

oranges wrote:
Stickymayhem wrote:Yeah I'm going to do my best to not let this become the norm on Manuel we aren't fucking baystation
You'd have to actually be active and unbanned from discord to do any of these things sticky
how is a whole admin banned from discord

that's like if the president was banned from the white house
[youtube]38VBv0ZenZU[/youtube]
Spoiler:
Image
ThanatosRa wrote:My biggest problem is that I can't fix any of this.
Boris wrote:shadowflame either has a brain the size of a pea or one the size of the moon and he's playing 58D chess.
BeeSting12 wrote:please write an apology to this forums, this community, the host, and the internet as a whole for the data storage space you wasted with this complaint.
BebeYoshi wrote:Saltyflame909
Cobby wrote:The trash bin... have you lost your way home anon?
User avatar
oranges
Code Maintainer
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
Byond Username: Optimumtact
Github Username: optimumtact
Reddit Username: msolikesass
Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by oranges » #566097

he angered mso
cybersaber101
In-Game Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2019 1:30 am
Byond Username: Cybersaber101
Location: Canada, eh?

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by cybersaber101 » #566104

Shadowflame909 wrote:
oranges wrote:
Stickymayhem wrote:Yeah I'm going to do my best to not let this become the norm on Manuel we aren't fucking baystation
You'd have to actually be active and unbanned from discord to do any of these things sticky
how is a whole admin banned from discord

that's like if the president was banned from the white house
If an admin is the president then mso is a lizard king controlling the USA from the shadows.
The same poster, over and over and over and over and over and-
confused rock
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 12:18 am
Byond Username: The unloved rock

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by confused rock » #566108

admins saying I valided james as hard as physically possible while killing all of my teammates when I was hesistant the whole way through and stopped whenever a mistake hurt one of (as in the same one several times in a fucking row) my coworkers while in the end even with what effort I did put in the antag ended up unstoppable leading to 6 people dying really makin me question what else I was supposed to do I could ignore him entirely despite stopping crime being my job and then only 5 people would die and I wouldn't be evil valid man or I could've valided as hard as possible and I would've maybe stopped James after he killed the first guy.
Makin me wonder if there is any universe where I get to stop james before he kills everyone without it being a step too far
makin me wonder what those guys james was trying to kill were supposed to do
makin me wonder if the "antags can do whatever we want" rule is completely reversed and now if I don't think someone is an antag I can be harsher to them
makin me wonder whose idea it was that we should just rip these roleplay rules from goon with basically no changes, a server which has an entirely different base ruleset. I'm under the impression this is already being reconsidered is why I didn't bother with any policy discussion.
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
NoxVS
In-Game Admin
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2018 7:43 pm
Byond Username: NoxVS

Re: Peanut Brittle: Unloved Rock thread

Post by NoxVS » #566114

confused rock wrote:admins saying I valided james as hard as physically possible while killing all of my teammates when I was hesistant the whole way through and stopped whenever a mistake hurt one of (as in the same one several times in a fucking row) my coworkers while in the end even with what effort I did put in the antag ended up unstoppable leading to 6 people dying really makin me question what else I was supposed to do I could ignore him entirely despite stopping crime being my job and then only 5 people would die and I wouldn't be evil valid man or I could've valided as hard as possible and I would've maybe stopped James after he killed the first guy.
Makin me wonder if there is any universe where I get to stop james before he kills everyone without it being a step too far
makin me wonder what those guys james was trying to kill were supposed to do
makin me wonder if the "antags can do whatever we want" rule is completely reversed and now if I don't think someone is an antag I can be harsher to them
makin me wonder whose idea it was that we should just rip these roleplay rules from goon with basically no changes, a server which has an entirely different base ruleset. I'm under the impression this is already being reconsidered is why I didn't bother with any policy discussion.
come on Rock don't act like there was nothing you could have done. All you had to do was not see valid gear and immediately decide to deep fry and eat it. Thats it. Rest of security was going to actually have an interesting roleplay opportunity but you ruined it for them. It seemed pretty obvious that the officer you said Rave spit in the face of with his decision was disappointed that rather than have any form of interaction with me you instead walked in, ate the whole driving force behind any interrogation or whatever. You and the other officer caught me before I had done anything and when you saw valid gear the first thing that went through your mind was how to immediately destroy it. There probably wouldn't have been any issue if you brought it to sec. Could have put it in evidence, could have given it to another officer or to the captain, could have kept it on you. Anything other than "VALID MAN NEEDS THIS TIME TO DESTROY IT"

It probably would have been fine if I had been tossed in perma or given more restrictions and released. Captain could have made that decision had there been any chance for any form of interrotion. All you had to do was literally anything aside from instantly deciding to deep fry the valids
The weak should fear the strong
thehogshotgun wrote:How does having jannies like you, who have more brain tumor than brain benefit the server
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]