/tg/Station 13

Was this not the case anyways? I don't think you CAN do Nuke Ops/Zombies/Be A Dragon/Delam The SM without killing anyone who gets in your way, so Murderbone rules don't even apply unless the person is blatantly ignoring what their final objective requires to kill people for their epic ss13 kill mon...

What does that have to do with being allowed to murderbone? If it's in pursuit of something like station destruction objective, it does not fall under what the rules would consider murderbone. Murderbone is already a negative buzzword but it is intended to be aimed at something else entirely. That ...

Response to mrmelbert My personal two cents is while I think very relaxed escalation makes sense (killing people to spread romerol, for example) allowing full murderbone will just see traitors running down the halls with 60 tc full of equipment deswording random bystanders' heads off off with zero i...

just to let you know that a traitor cannot really complete their final objective. When they take their final objective, all other objectives get disabled and they automatically greentext (like heretic). They don't necessarily have to follow their final objective either, but most of their final objec...

When a traitor takes a final objective, they can no longer take any more objectives and are automatically awarded greentext. Most final objectives are usually station destruction or mass panic/mayhem, so it would make sense that (on MRP) traitors would be allowed to do whatever they want now that th...

I'll be lifting this ban and turning it into a 1 year (from today) OOC ban. If you are told to not do something in OOC and then proceed to do it in the ahelp, this is a very bad idea and harsh punishments will be applied. You should also not jokingly post the IPs of admins as this will also be dealt...

As for the reinforced windows part, I'll make amendments to the note, but it doesn't change anything because reinforced windows are still very easy to destroy and deconstruct in comparison to reinforced walls, which is a much more difficult thing entirely. EDIT: To put it in clear terms, this appeal...

This doesn't really change anything. People executing others for bad reasons should be ahelped, but their actions don't justify yours. You should not be copying a rulebreaker's actions if they are truly rulebreaking. Now you can execute someone if they're actually acting like an antagonist, but buil...

I'm going to host a private SCP laboratory server for anyone willing to join over the weekends, post a reply in this thread with your discord name and tag if you want to play so that I can ping you when we start playing.

Quite a lot of traitor item costs were balanced around the fact that 20 used to be the maximum - think scarp and nstar gloves. Can't buy em both without a discount or buddy. 21 TC lets you get both, 22 TC lets you do double powersink, 23 TC lets you do blah blah blah bogus silly shit that we used t...

- Smuggling objectives are cool but its starting to get pretty obvious and easy to for people to meta. Maybe instead of the cargo shuttle there could be a designated spot where a drop pod comes to collect the item like with contracting? I want to change the smuggle objective so that the destination...

LRP. Maybe it's just me but I'm seeing traitors end shifts with averages of 30tc. This is, obviously, a little high. Perhaps turning down the TC gain/making some form of diminishing return so that the high-rollers stand out a little less might be worthwhile? Some method or system that doesn't punch...

Post progression traitor feedback here

Please include whether your experience is from LRP or MRP

I don't think I'm going to be accepting this appeal because of your joke appeal and your past history. It also seems like you're trying to come up with excuses as to why you didn't listen to an admin instead of just admitting that what you were doing was wrong and that you are sorry for it. Not ever...

You forgot to talk about the fact that you posted fake IPs of several admins on the server too and that you posted a joke appeal less than 30 days ago, why do you think you deserve a second chance?

there's no way to cancel activation/deactivation once it starts which messed me up several times this, and also the combat modsuits are really clunky to use, makes them much more difficult to effectively use when in any sort of combat. It's also hard to tell what module does what in the 'active mod...

very cool, though you should look at organising the modsuit modules in the robotics console as it's packed into one big list

what it needs is to move the songs from files that a client downloads to ytdl because it freezes your client for several seconds whenever a new song plays

How would it be harder to code than any other objective? You would just have to dismantle the catch-all objective for high-risk items and add the other ones. It's something we can work on over a period of time, it doesn't have to be on release. This is part of my crusade against all non-admin spawn...

Itseasytosee2me wrote: ↑Fri Dec 17, 2021 1:57 am I think it would be sick to take every high-risk item and turn them into a unique objective.

already a thing

By UNIQUE I mean that they only appear once as an objective for a traitor. They don't have their own special objective for each one because that would be hell to code.

Sylphet wrote: ↑Tue Dec 14, 2021 11:27 pm I think that they have a shaky grasp of ticket handling and when rule enforcement is appropriate. More work to do to become a good admin, but the potential is there. Delay.

Could you be more specific when you say this? I don't know what or which incident you might be referring to

What are your thoughts on making certain objectives worth more to people who don't normally have access to it? Sure, that's doable and fine but probably not going to be something I work on because it requires a lot of fine tweaking so that you don't fuck up the balance, which I don't have the abili...

cool objectives, I'll be sure to take some of these

do remember that objectives can only be available depending on conditions too, including conditions on the traitor taking the objective. Example: you can have objectives locked to a job

You can appeal this when you are actually serious about getting unbanned.

This is a meme appeal and it's been less than a month since you were banned. I'm rejecting this appeal.

I was playing blob, they spawned in a deathsquad on a long blob round when I was about to win, I immediately lost as a result and it prolonged the round and was really shitty on me as a player. I had spent a good chunk of my time fighting the crew, so to lose to an adminspawned deathsquad right on t...

After some discussion, I think I'm going to remove this note because they attacked you with a chair and I've been convinced that it's a good enough justification to kill an unmindshielded person on a revolutionary round.

This should be resolved, I'll remove the note.

You didn't warn them once to back off or to stop following you, you didn't escalate the situation at all, they threw a chair at you once and you killed them for it. You do not get to kill people because they are slightly suspicious and there is no place you can detain them. It is like what I said in...

Alright, I'll lift this ban for you as mrmelbert is busy right now and has asked for someone else to do it as it is a requested ban. Have fun!

If you aren't signed up to the event, I see no reason to lower the ban duration by 1 day.

Are you signed up to the event?

Alright, so in this round, you maxcapped the shuttle as a research director that you had took over after dying because you had roleplayed as a Nazi. I didn't know you had roleplayed as a Nazi, only that you had a bad name, until I looked into the logs at the end of the round, which led me to consult...

this is a test

I think this should definitely be done

Regarding ability capping, the difference is, an assistant could learn those other things if they wanted to, a brain can have gone down any number of different paths in its life. An infinite number of spiders put in an infinite number of rooms containing chem masters will only make things by mistak...

I agree with mothblocks, this would be better as a code change rather than as a policy change. Otherwise, why stop at space dragons and spiders using knowledge they shouldn't normally have? Players are allowed to use knowledge they wouldn't reasonably have. If we're capping what knowledge can be use...

Double agent, even with this rework idea, seems like something that would only work on MRP where you aren't allowed to murderbone because people would just share tc and team up anyways. Another reason it was removed was that having all your antagonists focus on taking each other out leaves very litt...

Ultimately what i’ve gathered from this thread is that people mostly dislike omnidirecrional, repetitive jobs with not much to do except one singular thing. Amount of content doesn’t matter (see: xenobio), and ultimately it really just depends on how engaged you are with the process of doing the jo...

cocothegogo wrote:This has been the case since abductor was introduced

Not really relevant, it's still hidden rulings that require you to get punished beforehand to figure out.

It’s funny, because on the wiki (https://tgstation13.org/wiki/Abductor) we had Angust ask for a headmin rulling on the matter as far as August 2019. While regular antag page is definetly not something you should use in an appeal, information written there should still be considered. Firstly, it is ...

I agree fully that abductors should get policy text saying they can't kill randomly Policy text would be nice, but there's also other antags that policy isn't clear on either (wabbajacked creatures) I like the solution stickymayhem brought up, an antag chart saying which antags count as a side-anta...

The situation Recently, I got warned for preemptively killing security as an abductor because we had completed our objectives and me and my abductor buddy agreed to troll security. We bought a shrink ray and shrinked people, I had killed 1 person in security because I thought abductors were under r...

ram should really be accessible remotely without a wire connection like how you can access variables in UE4, the amount of wires crossing in Melbert's picture remind me of how messy blueprints can get if you dont use that functionality. edit: to clarify: https://miro.medium.com/max/2068/1*w2BHurNls...

Search found 93 matches