http://todogroup.org/opencodeofconduct/
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/rELAJmq.png)
presented without comment
Omega_DarkPotato wrote:This sucks, dude.
yeah be nice to even see this in the forum/server rules hehKor wrote: When are we adopting this code of conduct?
A popular Webm converter tool's repo was recently banned, ostensibly because the description was "WebM for Retards". If this code of conduct is intended exclusively for their own projects, then that's their business. But the evidence doesn't indicate that is the case.Kor wrote:EDIT: I misread I thought it was terms of use for the site not just their projects.
Err, yeah. I'm not fond of this code of conduct but opening 20 protest PRs probably is not the wisest course of action.bandit wrote:if people are really that worried about the spessmens repo being affected, an A+ way to ensure that it never comes to github's attention is to make 20 PRs in a row in the open code of conduct group, under your actual username
christ, it's like no one has any common sense
You shut my pr or issue report down without allowing discussion, I open a new one. This is how I operate, I did it to tgstation (and got repo banned for a short while for it).bandit wrote:if people are really that worried about the spessmens repo being affected, an A+ way to ensure that it never comes to github's attention is to make 20 PRs in a row in the open code of conduct group, under your actual username
christ, it's like no one has any common sense
Reverse racism and reverse sexism don't fucking exist:‘Reverse’ -isms, including ‘reverse racism,’ ‘reverse sexism,’ and ‘cisphobia’
I think cisphobia is a fancy word for "the desire for a genocide against heterosexual white males"lumipharon wrote:Are these people fucking serious?
Cisphobia? Is this even a fucking thing? Jesus Christ it hurts to live.
'lumipharon wrote:Are these people fucking serious?
Cisphobia? Is this even a fucking thing? Jesus Christ it hurts to live.
this is also literally what the first bullet point is sayingLuke Cox wrote:"Reverse racism" is a retarded concept. Racism is racism, regardless of the race of either party. If you think "reverse racism" is acceptable, you are a fucking bigot.
uh i hate to break it to you but i think you need to take your own advice, because it's saying that complaints about cisphobia, reverse racism and reverse sexism will be ignored. i.e. these things are allowedbandit wrote:learn to read, the first bullet point is basically "cisphobia is not a fucking thing and we're not going to read your shit complaints about it"
no it doesn't, if it meant that then why would "reverse racism" or whatever be in scare quotesAmnestik wrote:the only points i really have a problem with are 1 and 3, the rest looks okay to me!!!!
uh i hate to break it to you but i think you need to take your own advice, because it's saying that complaints about cisphobia, reverse racism and reverse sexism will be ignored. i.e. these things are allowedbandit wrote:learn to read, the first bullet point is basically "cisphobia is not a fucking thing and we're not going to read your shit complaints about it"
it ties in with "prioritising marginalised people's safety over privileged people's comfort"
How reactionary and overzealous of you.Cheridan wrote:Discussion of moving our own project code is still happening.
Because they don't think it's an issue or wouldn't call it that themselves.bandit wrote:no it doesn't, if it meant that then why would "reverse racism" or whatever be in scare quotesAmnestik wrote:the only points i really have a problem with are 1 and 3, the rest looks okay to me!!!!
uh i hate to break it to you but i think you need to take your own advice, because it's saying that complaints about cisphobia, reverse racism and reverse sexism will be ignored. i.e. these things are allowedbandit wrote:learn to read, the first bullet point is basically "cisphobia is not a fucking thing and we're not going to read your shit complaints about it"
it ties in with "prioritising marginalised people's safety over privileged people's comfort"
That's a pretty sweet overzealous reactionary post. Does 'discussion' mean something different to you? So far, the discussion has been leaning towards "Don't", but I think that given this situation and the nature of this game we should at least have our options explored.Amnestik wrote:How reactionary and overzealous of you.Cheridan wrote:Discussion of moving our own project code is still happening.
MimicFaux wrote:I remember my first time, full of wonderment and excitement playing this game I had heard so many stories about.
on the arrival shuttle, I saw the iconic toolbox on the ground. I clubbed myself in the head with it trying to figure out the controls.
Setting the tool box, now bloodied, back on the table; I went to heal myself with a medkit. I clubbed myself in the head with that too.
I've come a long ways from asking how to switch hands.
This -- people are making a fuck of a lot of a big deal about what is essentially nothing and unless people keep trolling the open source repo, will affect us exactly zero. Last bit directed to MSO in particular because come on, man.oranges wrote:can i just clarify that this isn't github's code of conduct - it's been adopted for some open source projects github runs.
Github TOS is their sitewide service and conduct terms.
I'm not doing this because I think it affects us, I'm doing it because I am an Men's Rights Activist and reverse sexism does real.bandit wrote:Last bit directed to MSO in particular because come on, man.
This coincided with a repo getting blocked over the use of the word retard.Incoming wrote:yeah don't move the repo over the fact that some github sponsored project on github has some idiotic CoC doc, if GITHUB makes this there CoC then maybe, but it's a huge pain the ass to move shop over something that literally doesn't affect us at all.
MrStonedOne wrote:I'm not doing this because I think it affects us, I'm doing it because I am an Men's Rights Activist and reverse sexism does real.bandit wrote:Last bit directed to MSO in particular because come on, man.
yeah but seeMrStonedOne wrote:I'm not doing this because I think it affects us, I'm doing it because I am an Men's Rights Activist and reverse sexism does real.bandit wrote:Last bit directed to MSO in particular because come on, man.
The TOS allows github to block any repo they find could cause offense, when that line drops to retarded levels (pun 100% intended) you have no way of knowing how they will perceive you.Incoming wrote:I admit that that does sound rather developmentally challenged. In any case we aren't called retardstation13 (yet) and don't openly add features that make fun of other races/genders/sexual orientations/whatever. We also don't even talk about the kind of things that could run afoul of this even if it was "the law of the land". I don't know the race or sexual orientation of any other coder (and why the fuck should I?) and half the time I don't even remember what GENDER everyone is.
I mean really sucks for those webm guys, but we're pretty in the clear here. I don't know why you're getting bent up because a service we use has been making some questionable life choices lately. You think a decade with byond would desensitize one a bit.
>remove content or accounts containing content that we determine in our sole discretion are unlawful, offensive...rdght91 wrote:>Nobody could have predicted github blocking webm for retards.
People who read the terms of service?
If says:
"We may, but have no obligation to, remove Content and Accounts containing Content that we determine in our sole discretion are unlawful, offensive, threatening, libelous, defamatory, pornographic, obscene or otherwise objectionable or violates any party's intellectual property or these Terms of Service."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users