sinful peanut gallery
Forum rules
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
- Archie700
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 1:56 am
- Byond Username: Archie700
sinful peanut gallery
viewtopic.php?t=30877&view=unread#unread
local assistant plays stupid games, wins stupid prizes
local assistant plays stupid games, wins stupid prizes
- CoffeeDragon16
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 3:31 pm
- Byond Username: CoffeeDragon16
- Location: Sybil
Re: sinful peanut gallery
sinfuls appeals are the worst to deal with. i respect having a video though its very helpful
- Pandarsenic
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:56 pm
- Byond Username: Pandarsenic
- Location: AI Upload
Re: sinful peanut gallery
I thought you can only appeal notes that are inaccurate, not notes that you just don't like
(2:53:35 AM) scaredofshadows: how about head of robutts
I once wrote a guide to fixing telecomms woohoo
I once wrote a guide to fixing telecomms woohoo
- CMDR_Gungnir
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2021 11:11 am
- Byond Username: CMDR Gungnir
Re: sinful peanut gallery
I'm kind of impressed by how hard he's rules lawyering. I feel like it should be obvious that the intent of the policy is "Once the conflict is over, it has to escalate again".
Like, the fight's over. You have to put at least SOME mild effort into building back up to the fight, otherwise you could just ambush someone in the halls because they did something to you earlier.
Like, the fight's over. You have to put at least SOME mild effort into building back up to the fight, otherwise you could just ambush someone in the halls because they did something to you earlier.
- Archie700
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 1:56 am
- Byond Username: Archie700
Re: sinful peanut gallery
Ah, but you see, he didn't KILL the person, he only crit him! So everything they did to de-escalate doesn't matter because the fight is still going on!CMDR_Gungnir wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:11 am I'm kind of impressed by how hard he's rules lawyering. I feel like it should be obvious that the intent of the policy is "Once the conflict is over, it has to escalate again".
Like, the fight's over. You have to put at least SOME mild effort into building back up to the fight, otherwise you could just ambush someone in the halls because they did something to you earlier.
- CoffeeDragon16
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 3:31 pm
- Byond Username: CoffeeDragon16
- Location: Sybil
Re: sinful peanut gallery
if u disagree with it that probably means you think its factually inaccurate tooPandarsenic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:05 am I thought you can only appeal notes that are inaccurate, not notes that you just don't like
- CMDR_Gungnir
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2021 11:11 am
- Byond Username: CMDR Gungnir
Re: sinful peanut gallery
brb ambushing the CMO in the halls because he accidentally scalpel'd me instead of surgery because I had a hat onArchie700 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:14 amAh, but you see, he didn't KILL the person, he only crit him! So everything they did to de-escalate doesn't matter because the fight is still going on!CMDR_Gungnir wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:11 am I'm kind of impressed by how hard he's rules lawyering. I feel like it should be obvious that the intent of the policy is "Once the conflict is over, it has to escalate again".
Like, the fight's over. You have to put at least SOME mild effort into building back up to the fight, otherwise you could just ambush someone in the halls because they did something to you earlier.
- Archie700
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 1:56 am
- Byond Username: Archie700
Re: sinful peanut gallery
In this case it helped us see how he was totally in the wrongCoffeeDragon16 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:46 am sinfuls appeals are the worst to deal with. i respect having a video though its very helpful
- Vekter
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:25 pm
- Byond Username: Vekter
- Location: Fucking around with the engine.
Re: sinful peanut gallery
Hot take but can we just get rid of note appeals? 9 out of 10 fail because they can't prove that the note's not factual and it just ends in the note being slightly modified.
Also anyone arguing that "them" is always plural when singular they/them exists is automatically arguing in bad faith, fuck off.
Also anyone arguing that "them" is always plural when singular they/them exists is automatically arguing in bad faith, fuck off.
AliasTakuto wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:11 pm As for the ear replacing stuff, you can ask Anne but I don't think this is what I was banned for. If I was all I can say is "Sorry for being hilarious"...
Omega_DarkPotato wrote:This sucks, dude.
Spoiler:
- Vekter
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:25 pm
- Byond Username: Vekter
- Location: Fucking around with the engine.
Re: sinful peanut gallery
Calling someone a degenerate is a real bruh momentSuper Aggro Crag wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:27 am[deleted comment]Vekter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:51 am Hot take but can we just get rid of note appeals? 9 out of 10 fail because they can't prove that the note's not factual and it just ends in the note being slightly modified.
Also anyone arguing that "them" is always plural when singular they/them exists is automatically arguing in bad faith, fuck off.
Last edited by wubli on Mon Jan 31, 2022 12:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: removed comment edited
Reason: removed comment edited
AliasTakuto wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:11 pm As for the ear replacing stuff, you can ask Anne but I don't think this is what I was banned for. If I was all I can say is "Sorry for being hilarious"...
Omega_DarkPotato wrote:This sucks, dude.
Spoiler:
- iamgoofball
- Github User
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:50 pm
- Byond Username: Iamgoofball
- Github Username: Iamgoofball
Re: sinful peanut gallery
i disagreeVekter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:51 am Hot take but can we just get rid of note appeals? 9 out of 10 fail because they can't prove that the note's not factual and it just ends in the note being slightly modified.
Also anyone arguing that "them" is always plural when singular they/them exists is automatically arguing in bad faith, fuck off.
sometimes bad notes do happen and people have a right to object to marks placed against their accounts by admins
also, then we can't laugh at morons like sinfulbliss who literally post video evidence of them being a greytiding shithead while going "WOW WHAT DID I DO WRONG???"
- Super Aggro Crag
- In Game PermaBanned
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:47 pm
- Byond Username: Super Aggro Crag
Re: sinful peanut gallery
Would you have preferred i called you chud, you putrid simpering blubberfuck?Vekter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 6:14 amCalling someone a degenerate is a real bruh momentSuper Aggro Crag wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:27 am[removed comment]Vekter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:51 am Hot take but can we just get rid of note appeals? 9 out of 10 fail because they can't prove that the note's not factual and it just ends in the note being slightly modified.
Also anyone arguing that "them" is always plural when singular they/them exists is automatically arguing in bad faith, fuck off.
Even fucking goofball is being more right than you on this matter in particular. Christ.
Last edited by wubli on Mon Jan 31, 2022 12:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: i don't have it in me to delete this one but edited the previous
Reason: i don't have it in me to delete this one but edited the previous
- BONERMASTER
- Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2018 2:28 pm
- Byond Username: BONERMASTER
Re: sinful peanut gallery
People skills get you further than a flash does. Sinful, you fucking around with the locker and then pulling out the flash to drop the engineer, completely out of the blue, was the worst way to ask for insulated gloves, peacefully at least.
Rather than reviewing the rules and policy of the game, I would recommend reviewing your own conduct ingame. A good way to start that is to ask yourself how you, as the opposing party, would have handled that situation.
That's also a good tip for lawyering in general. You are more convicning if you arguments tackle the fundamental view and understanding of a concept, rather than the placement and spelling of a few words in a rulebook.
With lawful regards
-BONERMASTER
Rather than reviewing the rules and policy of the game, I would recommend reviewing your own conduct ingame. A good way to start that is to ask yourself how you, as the opposing party, would have handled that situation.
That's also a good tip for lawyering in general. You are more convicning if you arguments tackle the fundamental view and understanding of a concept, rather than the placement and spelling of a few words in a rulebook.
With lawful regards
-BONERMASTER
SIGNATURE UNDER CONSTRUCTION
*YOUR ADVERTISEMENT COULD BE HERE* - Contact BONERMASTER & Associates for further information
*YOUR ADVERTISEMENT COULD BE HERE* - Contact BONERMASTER & Associates for further information
- sinfulbliss
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2019 8:53 am
- Byond Username: SinfulBliss
- Location: prisoner re-education chamber
Re: sinful peanut gallery
The only part of my behavior I somewhat regret, was flashing him out of the blue. I should have just dragged the locker to maint or something instead. But even this was not something noteworthy, flashing someone a few times is an IC issue.BONERMASTER wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 7:18 am People skills get you further than a flash does. Sinful, you fucking around with the locker and then pulling out the flash to drop the engineer, completely out of the blue, was the worst way to ask for insulated gloves, peacefully at least.
Rather than reviewing the rules and policy of the game, I would recommend reviewing your own conduct ingame. A good way to start that is to ask yourself how you, as the opposing party, would have handled that situation.
That's also a good tip for lawyering in general. You are more convicning if you arguments tackle the fundamental view and understanding of a concept, rather than the placement and spelling of a few words in a rulebook.
With lawful regards
-BONERMASTER
It's not about placement and spelling. It's about when you are allowed to retaliate in response to being attacked. Previously you could retaliate up and until you were killed and revived. I was only crit, so I was allowed to retaliate. Now the policy is amended so you can retaliate up and until you are incapacitated and treated. This isn't rule-lawyering, it's a completely different policy in practice.
Spoiler:
- CMDR_Gungnir
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2021 11:11 am
- Byond Username: CMDR Gungnir
Re: sinful peanut gallery
It strikes me as the difference between RAW and RAI. The spirit of the rule is very clearly that once the fight is over, the fight is over, and it has to be worked towards again (unless you have reason to believe they're an antag). The wording may be "killed" and "revived", but what real significance do they have that simply being crit/brought out of crit doesn't? It's not like most players actually pretend to care about death. If the policy wasn't that once you get revived the fight's over, you'd probably just go straight back, right?sinfulbliss wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 7:27 amThe only part of my behavior I somewhat regret, was flashing him out of the blue. I should have just dragged the locker to maint or something instead. But even this was not something noteworthy, flashing someone a few times is an IC issue.BONERMASTER wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 7:18 am People skills get you further than a flash does. Sinful, you fucking around with the locker and then pulling out the flash to drop the engineer, completely out of the blue, was the worst way to ask for insulated gloves, peacefully at least.
Rather than reviewing the rules and policy of the game, I would recommend reviewing your own conduct ingame. A good way to start that is to ask yourself how you, as the opposing party, would have handled that situation.
That's also a good tip for lawyering in general. You are more convicning if you arguments tackle the fundamental view and understanding of a concept, rather than the placement and spelling of a few words in a rulebook.
With lawful regards
-BONERMASTER
It's not about placement and spelling. It's about when you are allowed to retaliate in response to being attacked. Previously you could retaliate up and until you were killed and revived. I was only crit, so I was allowed to retaliate. Now the policy is amended so you can retaliate up and until you are incapacitated and treated. This isn't rule-lawyering, it's a completely different policy in practice.
- Kendrickorium
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2019 1:00 am
- Byond Username: Kendrickorium
Re: sinful peanut gallery
digg has rotted your brain.Vekter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:51 am Hot take but can we just get rid of note appeals? 9 out of 10 fail because they can't prove that the note's not factual and it just ends in the note being slightly modified.
Also anyone arguing that "them" is always plural when singular they/them exists is automatically arguing in bad faith, fuck off.
- Rohen_Tahir
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:00 pm
- Byond Username: Rohen Tahir
- Location: Primary fool storage
- Contact:
- TheFinalPotato
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:58 am
- Byond Username: LemonInTheDark
Re: sinful peanut gallery
I hate players
-
- Forum Soft Banned
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
- Byond Username: Cacogen
Re: sinful peanut gallery
Yeah those engineers should've recognised that what he was doing didn't matter and not made a big thing of it
- wubli
- Joined: Sat May 13, 2017 6:10 am
- Byond Username: Wubli
Re: sinful peanut gallery
you do know that not being killed, but instead just being critted, is a good thing, right? and instead of taking it as deescalation you chose to go over the policy and said "well they didn't do this arguably worse thing. which means i'm OK to retaliate against them". can you call this acting in good faith?sinfulbliss wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 7:27 am Previously you could retaliate up and until you were killed and revived. I was only crit, so I was allowed to retaliate. Now the policy is amended so you can retaliate up and until you are incapacitated and treated. This isn't rule-lawyering, it's a completely different policy in practice.
- Farquaar
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 7:20 am
- Byond Username: Farquaar
- Location: Delta Quadrant
Re: sinful peanut gallery
This appeal gives me a headache just reading it.
Also mega digg janny energy
Last edited by Farquaar on Mon Jan 31, 2022 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
► Show Spoiler
- iamgoofball
- Github User
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:50 pm
- Byond Username: Iamgoofball
- Github Username: Iamgoofball
Re: sinful peanut gallery
hey i cant call you a fucking dipshit moron in the actual ban appeal (i have to use facts and evidence to do so there), but let me reiterate heresinfulbliss wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 7:27 am It's not about placement and spelling. It's about when you are allowed to retaliate in response to being attacked. Previously you could retaliate up and until you were killed and revived. I was only crit, so I was allowed to retaliate. Now the policy is amended so you can retaliate up and until you are incapacitated and treated. This isn't rule-lawyering, it's a completely different policy in practice.
new escalation policy still says you get fucking chewed out by an admin because it doesn't matter what happens in the conflict, if it ends up violent and the source cause is stupid(ie. "me want insuls"), it's the person who fucking started it's fault
and you started it by trying to steal the engineer's ID you fucking moron
learn to fucking use your words to ask for things next time
try pressing T to use the Say verb hotkey
- iamgoofball
- Github User
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:50 pm
- Byond Username: Iamgoofball
- Github Username: Iamgoofball
- Archie700
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 1:56 am
- Byond Username: Archie700
Re: sinful peanut gallery
So let me go and sum up the video because honestly I'm bored about this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGb0VIfJfVY
You decided to go and loot the engineer of his ID (?) because he didn't respond to you the first time you asked.
Then, after he shoves you and and tries to take it away from you, you decide to do a tug of war with him. He askes you to stop, at which point you say "just one pair", and he says you "already ave a apair", at which point you decide the smart idea was to flash him (??).
You fail to clarify anything and chase after him as he flees to engineering, at which point the CE and janitor join in the fight against you and see you have a flash (as assistant). You shovefight with them for a while, and then the janitor resorts to a beartrap to slow you down because you were moving around so much in engineering. You decide to attack him with a welder(???).
At this point, the engineer sees you're attacking the janitor and goes to combat intent himself, deciding to help the janitor. Escalating to harm by this point, you end up attacking people with a toolbox (the janitor and the engineer) and another engineer goes in to shove you. You are brought into crit, but not killed, and it seems they decided to spare killing you in favor of having the other engineer bring you to medbay, while not reporting to security, but stripping you of your flash, toolbelt and cuffs (which is to be fair, fitting). Note that you were just kicked out.
Now we go to 5 minutes later.
You somehow acquired a stunbaton and some metal rods and glass shards for spears (????) and decide to come back to engineering to take revenge on the engineer for having the audacity to crit you instead of killing you. He goes and hides himself and says you are breaking escalation policy (side note: some OOC in IC), he tries to escape, but you break through and start attacking him to hardcrit (?????). A plasmaman paramedic walks by and tells you to stop, but you continue. You decide to fireman carry (fine), but then see the CE, who rightfully concludes that you did wrong and tried to flash you, you decide to stun baton him twice in retaliation (??????) and then proceed to loot the guy of his toolbelt, PDA and gloves (???????) and try to exit. At this point, the CE has enough and flashes you down, then kills you. Realizing that you're more trouble than you're worth, the engineer, who nearly got robbed and critted, decides that you shouldn't be revived and throws you to the SM. The CE does raise a question, but doesn't actually do anything, neither did any of the other people who came in.
Did you, at any point, think through how you could avert this getting worse?
EDIT: Something that came in my mind, you said it yourself that only upon death and revival could the fight be de-escalated. Yet, you left the guy alive to be treated by the paramedic. By your own words, he should continue the conflict, because it never stops unless someone dies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGb0VIfJfVY
You decided to go and loot the engineer of his ID (?) because he didn't respond to you the first time you asked.
Then, after he shoves you and and tries to take it away from you, you decide to do a tug of war with him. He askes you to stop, at which point you say "just one pair", and he says you "already ave a apair", at which point you decide the smart idea was to flash him (??).
You fail to clarify anything and chase after him as he flees to engineering, at which point the CE and janitor join in the fight against you and see you have a flash (as assistant). You shovefight with them for a while, and then the janitor resorts to a beartrap to slow you down because you were moving around so much in engineering. You decide to attack him with a welder(???).
At this point, the engineer sees you're attacking the janitor and goes to combat intent himself, deciding to help the janitor. Escalating to harm by this point, you end up attacking people with a toolbox (the janitor and the engineer) and another engineer goes in to shove you. You are brought into crit, but not killed, and it seems they decided to spare killing you in favor of having the other engineer bring you to medbay, while not reporting to security, but stripping you of your flash, toolbelt and cuffs (which is to be fair, fitting). Note that you were just kicked out.
Now we go to 5 minutes later.
You somehow acquired a stunbaton and some metal rods and glass shards for spears (????) and decide to come back to engineering to take revenge on the engineer for having the audacity to crit you instead of killing you. He goes and hides himself and says you are breaking escalation policy (side note: some OOC in IC), he tries to escape, but you break through and start attacking him to hardcrit (?????). A plasmaman paramedic walks by and tells you to stop, but you continue. You decide to fireman carry (fine), but then see the CE, who rightfully concludes that you did wrong and tried to flash you, you decide to stun baton him twice in retaliation (??????) and then proceed to loot the guy of his toolbelt, PDA and gloves (???????) and try to exit. At this point, the CE has enough and flashes you down, then kills you. Realizing that you're more trouble than you're worth, the engineer, who nearly got robbed and critted, decides that you shouldn't be revived and throws you to the SM. The CE does raise a question, but doesn't actually do anything, neither did any of the other people who came in.
Did you, at any point, think through how you could avert this getting worse?
EDIT: Something that came in my mind, you said it yourself that only upon death and revival could the fight be de-escalated. Yet, you left the guy alive to be treated by the paramedic. By your own words, he should continue the conflict, because it never stops unless someone dies.
- massa
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2021 6:20 am
- Byond Username: Massa100
Re: sinful peanut gallery
Yeah he' broke into' engineering and flashed a guy 3 times (after asking politely many times), whatever. He didn't hurt them afterwards and stopped, and kept asking politely. I'll kill someone who walks towards me with a flash sure, but not if they flash me then do nothing at all. But you seriously think he's being a tiding shithead? He asked politely numerous times (pleases and sirs in point), asked for de-escalation too, many "cease"'s as he actively and deliberately avoided conflict. What he did was basically a shove, then stopped, and tried to correct course.iamgoofball wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 6:16 amalso, then we can't laugh at morons like sinfulbliss who literally post video evidence of them being a greytiding shithead while going "WOW WHAT DID I DO WRONG???"
It was only after he was threatened with the opening of a plasma canister, the brandishing of a charging telescoping baton, and then being bear trapped and physically assaulted by a janitor by 3 different people shoving and very clearly being aggressive with him. A janitor who was in Engineering, why? Killing and attacking someone he had no reason to be in conflict with? The engineers, sure. That janitor escalated harder than Axle or the Engineers did, against Axle. Everything Axle did before that was mostly normal SS13 shenanigans. He only used lethal force after a jannie, looking for trouble, not in his department, bear trapped him.
I'm not sure how much gasoline-cut crack cocaine you need to be boofing to think that this rule will be ever practiced seriously as an admin. The only way something gets 'reset' is if the round ends or I get taken to medbay and I instigated. If some rat actually pushes me to the point I kill them/felt the need to kill them (as a non-antag) in my department, as a human OOC, and IC, I have literally 0 reason to do anything for the person who forced my hand to that point. Why would I bring someone to medbay if they behaved in a manner that actually forced me to kill them? Also, I should probably read all the details, but if you get killed and dragged out of maint by a paramedic and revived, no fucking way in hell is has the conflict cooled down at all.sinfulbliss wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 7:27 amNow the policy is amended so you can retaliate up and until you are incapacitated and treated. This isn't rule-lawyering, it's a completely different policy in practice.
Last edited by massa on Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:17 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Forum Soft Banned
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
- Byond Username: Cacogen
Re: sinful peanut gallery
Greytide is a code problem and the only solution is to give these people something to do that they will actually do.
Add departmental assistants and assign them to crewmembers who opt into it and make them like golems where they're slaves who have to follow orders unquestioningly.
Alternatively: assistant killswitches.
You could also make assistants into drones. But drone is tedious shit since they got rid of the duffelbag and you can no longer carry things. Don't do this.
Alternatively: In Time assistants. The assistants are going to die of time poisoning. But if the crew give them time, it will stave off the time disease by that amount of time. So they must perform for the crew to continue having time. If time runs out, they get droppodded into a retirement home/slaughterhouse/organ harvesting ring/farm upstate to live out the rest of their time. But the key is that the currency keeping them on the station is also valuable to the people allotted it so they aren't just dumping it on assistants they like to keep them from being deported. The only problem with making it money to pay for periodic NT extortion is that the credit is so fucking weak. Like 2k is more than enough to sustain the average person their entire round. You don't want or need to spend more than that. There's cargo private orders in the want category but they don't get used often. I don't think they're visible or worthwhile enough. You make it stuff people actually value like a single 250k pulse rifle or a 25k bag of holding and people will start hoarding their wealth.
Alternatively: Assistant summon button. You press it and the Assistant is fucked off right to you. What good is a pair of gloves if you are now in a cell?
Add departmental assistants and assign them to crewmembers who opt into it and make them like golems where they're slaves who have to follow orders unquestioningly.
Alternatively: assistant killswitches.
You could also make assistants into drones. But drone is tedious shit since they got rid of the duffelbag and you can no longer carry things. Don't do this.
Alternatively: In Time assistants. The assistants are going to die of time poisoning. But if the crew give them time, it will stave off the time disease by that amount of time. So they must perform for the crew to continue having time. If time runs out, they get droppodded into a retirement home/slaughterhouse/organ harvesting ring/farm upstate to live out the rest of their time. But the key is that the currency keeping them on the station is also valuable to the people allotted it so they aren't just dumping it on assistants they like to keep them from being deported. The only problem with making it money to pay for periodic NT extortion is that the credit is so fucking weak. Like 2k is more than enough to sustain the average person their entire round. You don't want or need to spend more than that. There's cargo private orders in the want category but they don't get used often. I don't think they're visible or worthwhile enough. You make it stuff people actually value like a single 250k pulse rifle or a 25k bag of holding and people will start hoarding their wealth.
Alternatively: Assistant summon button. You press it and the Assistant is fucked off right to you. What good is a pair of gloves if you are now in a cell?
- Super Aggro Crag
- In Game PermaBanned
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:47 pm
- Byond Username: Super Aggro Crag
Re: sinful peanut gallery
i once suggested a pest control Pr that added a bunch of annoying things in maint to give the assistants something to kill because they'd get in the way of their maint loot.
- mindstormy
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2018 1:59 pm
- Byond Username: Mindstormy
Re: sinful peanut gallery
Video was a great touch. Made it much easier to place the blame on themselves and get the appeal denied.
- Qbmax32
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 4:05 am
- Byond Username: Qbmax32
- Github Username: qbmax32
- Location: in your walls
- Qbmax32
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 4:05 am
- Byond Username: Qbmax32
- Github Username: qbmax32
- Location: in your walls
Re: sinful peanut gallery
massa wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:10 pmYeah he' broke into' engineering and flashed a guy 3 times (after asking politely many times), whatever. He didn't hurt them afterwards and stopped, and kept asking politely. I'll kill someone who walks towards me with a flash sure, but not if they flash me then do nothing at all. But you seriously think he's being a tiding shithead? He asked politely numerous times (pleases and sirs in point), asked for de-escalation too, many "cease"'s as he actively and deliberately avoided conflict. What he did was basically a shove, then stopped, and tried to correct course.iamgoofball wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 6:16 amalso, then we can't laugh at morons like sinfulbliss who literally post video evidence of them being a greytiding shithead while going "WOW WHAT DID I DO WRONG???"
It was only after he was threatened with the opening of a plasma canister, the brandishing of a charging telescoping baton, and then being bear trapped and physically assaulted by a janitor by 3 different people shoving and very clearly being aggressive with him. A janitor who was in Engineering, why? Killing and attacking someone he had no reason to be in conflict with? The engineers, sure. That janitor escalated harder than Axle or the Engineers did, against Axle. Everything Axle did before that was mostly normal SS13 shenanigans. He only used lethal force after a jannie, looking for trouble, not in his department, bear trapped him.
I'm not sure how much gasoline-cut crack cocaine you need to be boofing to think that this rule will be ever practiced seriously as an admin. The only way something gets 'reset' is if the round ends or I get taken to medbay and I instigated. If some rat actually pushes me to the point I kill them/felt the need to kill them (as a non-antag) in my department, as a human OOC, and IC, I have literally 0 reason to do anything for the person who forced my hand to that point. Why would I bring someone to medbay if they behaved in a manner that actually forced me to kill them? Also, I should probably read all the details, but if you get killed and dragged out of maint by a paramedic and revived, no fucking way in hell is has the conflict cooled down at all.sinfulbliss wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 7:27 amNow the policy is amended so you can retaliate up and until you are incapacitated and treated. This isn't rule-lawyering, it's a completely different policy in practice.
tldr btw no one cares + you play assistant
- Qbmax32
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 4:05 am
- Byond Username: Qbmax32
- Github Username: qbmax32
- Location: in your walls
- Super Aggro Crag
- In Game PermaBanned
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:47 pm
- Byond Username: Super Aggro Crag
- massa
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2021 6:20 am
- Byond Username: Massa100
- Vekter
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:25 pm
- Byond Username: Vekter
- Location: Fucking around with the engine.
Re: sinful peanut gallery
I actually find that more offensive given how lefty I am. Cut down on the salt a bit, it's bad for your heart.Super Aggro Crag wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 6:23 amWould you have preferred i called you chud, you putrid simpering blubberfuck?Vekter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 6:14 amCalling someone a degenerate is a real bruh momentSuper Aggro Crag wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:27 am[removed comment]Vekter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:51 am Hot take but can we just get rid of note appeals? 9 out of 10 fail because they can't prove that the note's not factual and it just ends in the note being slightly modified.
Also anyone arguing that "them" is always plural when singular they/them exists is automatically arguing in bad faith, fuck off.
AliasTakuto wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:11 pm As for the ear replacing stuff, you can ask Anne but I don't think this is what I was banned for. If I was all I can say is "Sorry for being hilarious"...
Omega_DarkPotato wrote:This sucks, dude.
Spoiler:
- NoxVS
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2018 7:43 pm
- Byond Username: NoxVS
Re: sinful peanut gallery
Get out of your own peanut you clownsinfulbliss wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 7:27 amThe only part of my behavior I somewhat regret, was flashing him out of the blue. I should have just dragged the locker to maint or something instead. But even this was not something noteworthy, flashing someone a few times is an IC issue.BONERMASTER wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 7:18 am People skills get you further than a flash does. Sinful, you fucking around with the locker and then pulling out the flash to drop the engineer, completely out of the blue, was the worst way to ask for insulated gloves, peacefully at least.
Rather than reviewing the rules and policy of the game, I would recommend reviewing your own conduct ingame. A good way to start that is to ask yourself how you, as the opposing party, would have handled that situation.
That's also a good tip for lawyering in general. You are more convicning if you arguments tackle the fundamental view and understanding of a concept, rather than the placement and spelling of a few words in a rulebook.
With lawful regards
-BONERMASTER
It's not about placement and spelling. It's about when you are allowed to retaliate in response to being attacked. Previously you could retaliate up and until you were killed and revived. I was only crit, so I was allowed to retaliate. Now the policy is amended so you can retaliate up and until you are incapacitated and treated. This isn't rule-lawyering, it's a completely different policy in practice.
The weak should fear the strong
thehogshotgun wrote:How does having jannies like you, who have more brain tumor than brain benefit the server
- Cobby
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
- Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
- Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone
Re: sinful peanut gallery
the only part of my behavior i somewhat regret is not taking the rules even more literally and saying that because I, the person playing the video game, is still alive and not killed I can therefore return to combat.
Voted best trap in /tg/ 2014-current
- Farquaar
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 7:20 am
- Byond Username: Farquaar
- Location: Delta Quadrant
Re: sinful peanut gallery
Unless you drive over to my house and personally escort me to the hospital, you've violated escalation policy.
► Show Spoiler
- Cobby
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
- Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
- Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone
Re: sinful peanut gallery
you're in IRL crit so you could come back I have to kill you hopefully god didnt remove cloning
Voted best trap in /tg/ 2014-current
- Farquaar
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 7:20 am
- Byond Username: Farquaar
- Location: Delta Quadrant
Re: sinful peanut gallery
Just inject my blood into the rhubarb plant I've got in the backyard. I'll be fine.
► Show Spoiler
- Cobby
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
- Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
- Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone
Re: sinful peanut gallery
i harvested before you crossed over rip.
can you tell me who the antags are?
can you tell me who the antags are?
Voted best trap in /tg/ 2014-current
-
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 10:16 pm
- Byond Username: B00t
Re: sinful peanut gallery
I was called over to clean because the engineering team o2 suicided shift start. That's why you can see all of the organs stacked on the table. I was a pacifist and bear trapping was the only way I saw to help take down what I assumed was a revhead.
- Super Aggro Crag
- In Game PermaBanned
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:47 pm
- Byond Username: Super Aggro Crag
Re: sinful peanut gallery
go get boosted you fucking naziVekter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 6:40 pmI actually find that more offensive given how lefty I am. Cut down on the salt a bit, it's bad for your heart.Super Aggro Crag wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 6:23 amWould you have preferred i called you chud, you putrid simpering blubberfuck?Vekter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 6:14 amCalling someone a degenerate is a real bruh momentSuper Aggro Crag wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:27 am[removed comment]Vekter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:51 am Hot take but can we just get rid of note appeals? 9 out of 10 fail because they can't prove that the note's not factual and it just ends in the note being slightly modified.
Also anyone arguing that "them" is always plural when singular they/them exists is automatically arguing in bad faith, fuck off.
- massa
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2021 6:20 am
- Byond Username: Massa100
Re: sinful peanut gallery
Why would you assume the revhead would continue to be attacked by a converted rev? For 2 minutes?
Pacifist or not, a bear trap is a violent action that cripples and bleeds. Then, the ONE person the alleged revhead flashed comes back and starts battering him, and you make sure to join in on it (you continued pushing), AFTER you, yourself, had been flashed, and not been converted, eliminating suspicion that he was a revhead, with the engineer you thought he just converted to aid his cause doing the heavy lifting of toolboxing his 2d skull. I guess at this point it was just a fight and those get messy. I don't think you were very much in the wrong at all, though. I get how it played it out, it was a fast series of confusing events, and you did get flashed towards where he got critted.
This shit is an IC issue tbh.
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: sinful peanut gallery
vekter is the most authoritarian admin
- Super Aggro Crag
- In Game PermaBanned
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:47 pm
- Byond Username: Super Aggro Crag
Re: sinful peanut gallery
No oranges you dont get it if we dont give him and others like more power without oversight we might use our damnable tolerance and liberties to bring about a totalitarian fascist staff.
- TheFinalPotato
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:58 am
- Byond Username: LemonInTheDark
Re: sinful peanut gallery
People who greytide tend to have seen most of the game, and reached a state of boredom with the mechanics. Don't think giving them more to do would help, if they wanted something to do they'd be playing captain or sec.
Seems like an admin issue to me, and it seems like the admin solution is working.
- GamerAndYeahMick
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2021 10:17 pm
- Byond Username: GamerAndYeahMick
- Location: Quahog
Re: sinful peanut gallery
i've seen some absolute what moment notes before so this would be a bad ideaVekter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:51 am Hot take but can we just get rid of note appeals? 9 out of 10 fail because they can't prove that the note's not factual and it just ends in the note being slightly modified.
Also anyone arguing that "them" is always plural when singular they/them exists is automatically arguing in bad faith, fuck off.
- Archie700
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 1:56 am
- Byond Username: Archie700
Re: sinful peanut gallery
The original fight was started because Axle decided, somehow, to take the ID due to non-response and it escalated from there because to the CE and janitor, it looked like Axle was being greytider shit and it went on for long enough that eventually harmful methods had to be employed to stop him.massa wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 8:04 pmWhy would you assume the revhead would continue to be attacked by a converted rev? For 2 minutes?
Pacifist or not, a bear trap is a violent action that cripples and bleeds. Then, the ONE person the alleged revhead flashed comes back and starts battering him, and you make sure to join in on it (you continued pushing), AFTER you, yourself, had been flashed, and not been converted, eliminating suspicion that he was a revhead, with the engineer you thought he just converted to aid his cause doing the heavy lifting of toolboxing his 2d skull. I guess at this point it was just a fight and those get messy. I don't think you were very much in the wrong at all, though. I get how it played it out, it was a fast series of confusing events, and you did get flashed towards where he got critted.
This shit is an IC issue tbh.
That was fine.
Critting the engineer later wasn't.
- iwishforducks
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:48 pm
- Byond Username: Iwishforducks
- Qbmax32
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 4:05 am
- Byond Username: Qbmax32
- Github Username: qbmax32
- Location: in your walls
Re: sinful peanut gallery
this is goofy btw notes are a punishment/bad thing and making them unappealable would be cringeVekter wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:51 am Hot take but can we just get rid of note appeals? 9 out of 10 fail because they can't prove that the note's not factual and it just ends in the note being slightly modified.
Also anyone arguing that "them" is always plural when singular they/them exists is automatically arguing in bad faith, fuck off.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Smoted