You can't unfuck a face peanut

[conrad]

Bottom post of the previous page:

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=33724

ITT: Timonk is a poet.

[Timberpoes]

Lol

[Armhulen]

Lmao, even

[Unsane]

things would've been better if I wasn't banned and was still on Polcon

[TheFinalPotato]

EHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

worst shit has been posted before. except with no warning because femboys sticking their butts out talking about cock is well-entrenched in public consciousness whereas a slime facefucking a suspiciously young looking anime boy isn't

the double standard man. what the hell?

Sinful you have died on this hill before I stg

[MrStonedOne]

femboys sticking their butts out talking about cock is well-entrenched in public consciousness

Correct. well-entrenched in my consciousness at least.

[Striders13]

I missed sinful's takes

[Kubisopplay]

slime facefucking a suspiciously young looking anime boy isn't

dude you cant say this and then argue this ban in the same breath im not allowing it

how can you be sure i'm arguing against the ban? i'm not even sure what i'm arguing and i wrote the post

Sanest peanut poster

[conrad]

timonk please i beg even if its entertainment you dont want

OWNED BY EKATERINA

to be your legacy

Funniest shit I've seen in YEARS.

[dirk_mcblade]

I feel like this behavior on timonks part is questionable in particular because I believe he got certain people yeeted off the forums (deservedly so but nonetheless why are you doing this, mang?).

[sinfulbliss]

Sinful you have died on this hill before I stg

ERM...! OMG! HE SAID SO MANY WORDS THAT OFFEND MY WITTLE EAWDWUMS! OWCHIES!
What's that you say? His overall point was actually something completely uncontestable and agreeable?
N-no...! Da words dey make me UNCOMFY! So totally NOT wholesome chungus 420 ( >_< )

!	Message from: Armhulen
	User was warned for this post. Please be respectful of other users. You can disagree with someone without being a hostile douchebag.

[dirk_mcblade]

Sinful you have died on this hill before I stg

ERM...! OMG! HE SAID SO MANY WORDS THAT OFFEND MY WITTLE EAWDWUMS! OWCHIES!
What's that you say? His overall point was actually something completely uncontestable and agreeable?
N-no...! Da words dey make me UNCOMFY! So totally NOT wholesome chungus 420 ( >_< )

It's okay to think about what you intend to communicate before committing to a long screed nobody can pin down. In fact I'd argue it's disrespectful to the other person to make them sort through a bunch of words you haven't even committed an actual position behind them.

[Timonk]

If y'all don't believe me and try to fuse this with the lolicon drama i can post a picture gallery from changed to prove that Colin is drawn as an adult in the game too

[Timonk]

Also @MSO please don't use incriminating evidence from the peanut thread against me thanks

[sinfulbliss]

Sinful you have died on this hill before I stg

ERM...! OMG! HE SAID SO MANY WORDS THAT OFFEND MY WITTLE EAWDWUMS! OWCHIES!
What's that you say? His overall point was actually something completely uncontestable and agreeable?
N-no...! Da words dey make me UNCOMFY! So totally NOT wholesome chungus 420 ( >_< )

It's okay to think about what you intend to communicate before committing to a long screed nobody can pin down. In fact I'd argue it's disrespectful to the other person to make them sort through a bunch of words you haven't even committed an actual position behind them.

My mistake, my good man. I ought to strive to be more forthright in my verbiage, lest it become obfuscated and offend one's softer sensibilities.
It is indubitably the case that Graphics Interchange Formats, colloquially dubbed "GIFs", of feminine men with their derrieres in plain view, are posted on the TGstation Discord. In many such scenarios, the aforementioned men (henceforth dubbed "femboys"), are often also speaking about their inner sexual desires, often of a very plainly explicit nature. It seems quite curious to me that such presentations of overt sexual desire -- nay, of overt sexual display -- should be considered so casual in our wonderful discourses, while this "GIF," which may be, at least outwardly, less sexual, should be banned for its explicit nature. However, despite this observation, one cannot overlook the fact that the "GIF" in question here is offensive to the average man's sensibilities for other reasons - like their questionable age for instance. On these terms alone such a mute would be apprehended as justified to any but the most morally blind individual. That said, I do not believe such distinction was made in the ban reason, as it seemed to be for its sexual nature alone which, as I have argued already, is poor reasoning given the preponderance of other more explicit "femboy" "GIFs" strewn out.

[kieth4]

Wish we could just ban everyone who posted in this peanut.

[ekaterina]

Wish we could just ban everyone who posted in this peanut.

This now includes you. Enjoy your ban, sucker.

[dirk_mcblade]

Sinful you have died on this hill before I stg

ERM...! OMG! HE SAID SO MANY WORDS THAT OFFEND MY WITTLE EAWDWUMS! OWCHIES!
What's that you say? His overall point was actually something completely uncontestable and agreeable?
N-no...! Da words dey make me UNCOMFY! So totally NOT wholesome chungus 420 ( >_< )

It's okay to think about what you intend to communicate before committing to a long screed nobody can pin down. In fact I'd argue it's disrespectful to the other person to make them sort through a bunch of words you haven't even committed an actual position behind them.

My mistake, my good man. I ought to strive to be more forthright in my verbiage, lest it become obfuscated and offend one's softer sensibilities.
It is indubitably the case that Graphics Interchange Formats, colloquially dubbed "GIFs", of feminine men with their derrieres in plain view, are posted on the TGstation Discord. In many such scenarios, the aforementioned men (henceforth dubbed "femboys"), are often also speaking about their inner sexual desires, often of a very plainly explicit nature. It seems quite curious to me that such presentations of overt sexual desire -- nay, of overt sexual display -- should be considered so casual in our wonderful discourses, while this "GIF," which may be, at least outwardly, less sexual, should be banned for its explicit nature. However, despite this observation, one cannot overlook the fact that the "GIF" in question here is offensive to the average man's sensibilities for other reasons - like their questionable age for instance. On these terms alone such a mute would be apprehended as justified to any but the most morally blind individual. That said, I do not believe such distinction was made in the ban reason, as it seemed to be for its sexual nature alone which, as I have argued already, is poor reasoning given the preponderance of other more explicit "femboy" "GIFs" strewn out.

Ban femboys now.

[kinnebian]

posting in your own peanut leads to your downfall once again..

Heed the warning!!

[Timonk]

posting in your own peanut leads to your downfall once again..

Heed the warning!!

It's true
I knew the risk and took it

[Drag]

I thought I was on the Skyrat forums for a second reading this appeal

[conrad]

Sinful you have died on this hill before I stg

ERM...! OMG! HE SAID SO MANY WORDS THAT OFFEND MY WITTLE EAWDWUMS! OWCHIES!
What's that you say? His overall point was actually something completely uncontestable and agreeable?
N-no...! Da words dey make me UNCOMFY! So totally NOT wholesome chungus 420 ( >_< )

It's okay to think about what you intend to communicate before committing to a long screed nobody can pin down. In fact I'd argue it's disrespectful to the other person to make them sort through a bunch of words you haven't even committed an actual position behind them.

My mistake, my good man. I ought to strive to be more forthright in my verbiage, lest it become obfuscated and offend one's softer sensibilities.
It is indubitably the case that Graphics Interchange Formats, colloquially dubbed "GIFs", of feminine men with their derrieres in plain view, are posted on the TGstation Discord. In many such scenarios, the aforementioned men (henceforth dubbed "femboys"), are often also speaking about their inner sexual desires, often of a very plainly explicit nature. It seems quite curious to me that such presentations of overt sexual desire -- nay, of overt sexual display -- should be considered so casual in our wonderful discourses, while this "GIF," which may be, at least outwardly, less sexual, should be banned for its explicit nature. However, despite this observation, one cannot overlook the fact that the "GIF" in question here is offensive to the average man's sensibilities for other reasons - like their questionable age for instance. On these terms alone such a mute would be apprehended as justified to any but the most morally blind individual. That said, I do not believe such distinction was made in the ban reason, as it seemed to be for its sexual nature alone which, as I have argued already, is poor reasoning given the preponderance of other more explicit "femboy" "GIFs" strewn out.

I'm kinda busy rn could I get a tl;dr please?

[kinnebian]

Sinful you have died on this hill before I stg

ERM...! OMG! HE SAID SO MANY WORDS THAT OFFEND MY WITTLE EAWDWUMS! OWCHIES!
What's that you say? His overall point was actually something completely uncontestable and agreeable?
N-no...! Da words dey make me UNCOMFY! So totally NOT wholesome chungus 420 ( >_< )

It's okay to think about what you intend to communicate before committing to a long screed nobody can pin down. In fact I'd argue it's disrespectful to the other person to make them sort through a bunch of words you haven't even committed an actual position behind them.

My mistake, my good man. I ought to strive to be more forthright in my verbiage, lest it become obfuscated and offend one's softer sensibilities.
It is indubitably the case that Graphics Interchange Formats, colloquially dubbed "GIFs", of feminine men with their derrieres in plain view, are posted on the TGstation Discord. In many such scenarios, the aforementioned men (henceforth dubbed "femboys"), are often also speaking about their inner sexual desires, often of a very plainly explicit nature. It seems quite curious to me that such presentations of overt sexual desire -- nay, of overt sexual display -- should be considered so casual in our wonderful discourses, while this "GIF," which may be, at least outwardly, less sexual, should be banned for its explicit nature. However, despite this observation, one cannot overlook the fact that the "GIF" in question here is offensive to the average man's sensibilities for other reasons - like their questionable age for instance. On these terms alone such a mute would be apprehended as justified to any but the most morally blind individual. That said, I do not believe such distinction was made in the ban reason, as it seemed to be for its sexual nature alone which, as I have argued already, is poor reasoning given the preponderance of other more explicit "femboy" "GIFs" strewn out.

I'm kinda busy rn could I get a tl;dr please?

how do you tdlr a clear cut case of psychosis

[iwishforducks]

the character’s age has zero relevancy here you are actually insane. nobody wants to see a character getting fucking face raped with goo being shoved down their throat and Transformed

[iwishforducks]

actually I shouldn’t say Nobody because I’m sure someone here has found their new thing via this ban appeal

[conrad]

Sinful you have died on this hill before I stg

ERM...! OMG! HE SAID SO MANY WORDS THAT OFFEND MY WITTLE EAWDWUMS! OWCHIES!
What's that you say? His overall point was actually something completely uncontestable and agreeable?
N-no...! Da words dey make me UNCOMFY! So totally NOT wholesome chungus 420 ( >_< )

It's okay to think about what you intend to communicate before committing to a long screed nobody can pin down. In fact I'd argue it's disrespectful to the other person to make them sort through a bunch of words you haven't even committed an actual position behind them.

My mistake, my good man. I ought to strive to be more forthright in my verbiage, lest it become obfuscated and offend one's softer sensibilities.
It is indubitably the case that Graphics Interchange Formats, colloquially dubbed "GIFs", of feminine men with their derrieres in plain view, are posted on the TGstation Discord. In many such scenarios, the aforementioned men (henceforth dubbed "femboys"), are often also speaking about their inner sexual desires, often of a very plainly explicit nature. It seems quite curious to me that such presentations of overt sexual desire -- nay, of overt sexual display -- should be considered so casual in our wonderful discourses, while this "GIF," which may be, at least outwardly, less sexual, should be banned for its explicit nature. However, despite this observation, one cannot overlook the fact that the "GIF" in question here is offensive to the average man's sensibilities for other reasons - like their questionable age for instance. On these terms alone such a mute would be apprehended as justified to any but the most morally blind individual. That said, I do not believe such distinction was made in the ban reason, as it seemed to be for its sexual nature alone which, as I have argued already, is poor reasoning given the preponderance of other more explicit "femboy" "GIFs" strewn out.

I'm kinda busy rn could I get a tl;dr please?

how do you tdlr a clear cut case of psychosis

I guess I wait for sinful to take his meds and reply.

[iwishforducks]

Sinful you have died on this hill before I stg

ERM...! OMG! HE SAID SO MANY WORDS THAT OFFEND MY WITTLE EAWDWUMS! OWCHIES!
What's that you say? His overall point was actually something completely uncontestable and agreeable?
N-no...! Da words dey make me UNCOMFY! So totally NOT wholesome chungus 420 ( >_< )

It's okay to think about what you intend to communicate before committing to a long screed nobody can pin down. In fact I'd argue it's disrespectful to the other person to make them sort through a bunch of words you haven't even committed an actual position behind them.

My mistake, my good man. I ought to strive to be more forthright in my verbiage, lest it become obfuscated and offend one's softer sensibilities.
It is indubitably the case that Graphics Interchange Formats, colloquially dubbed "GIFs", of feminine men with their derrieres in plain view, are posted on the TGstation Discord. In many such scenarios, the aforementioned men (henceforth dubbed "femboys"), are often also speaking about their inner sexual desires, often of a very plainly explicit nature. It seems quite curious to me that such presentations of overt sexual desire -- nay, of overt sexual display -- should be considered so casual in our wonderful discourses, while this "GIF," which may be, at least outwardly, less sexual, should be banned for its explicit nature. However, despite this observation, one cannot overlook the fact that the "GIF" in question here is offensive to the average man's sensibilities for other reasons - like their questionable age for instance. On these terms alone such a mute would be apprehended as justified to any but the most morally blind individual. That said, I do not believe such distinction was made in the ban reason, as it seemed to be for its sexual nature alone which, as I have argued already, is poor reasoning given the preponderance of other more explicit "femboy" "GIFs" strewn out.

I'm kinda busy rn could I get a tl;dr please?

how do you tdlr a clear cut case of psychosis

I guess I wait for sinful to take his meds and reply.

hey guys what are we talking about this is a very long quote chain

[Armhulen]

WHAT IN THE NAME OF GENERAL RICHARDSON DO YOU THINK YOU'RE POSTING, MAGGOT?! YOUR PATHETIC EXCUSE FOR INTERNET BROWSING HAS TURNED YOUR BRAIN INTO MUSH!

[conrad]

funi

Not gonna lie I read maggot wrong and had a jumpscare.

[kinnebian]

i scrolled up super duper fast and sinfuls and timonks pfps merged to create a bald sinful

Sinful you have died on this hill before I stg

ERM...! OMG! HE SAID SO MANY WORDS THAT OFFEND MY WITTLE EAWDWUMS! OWCHIES!
What's that you say? His overall point was actually something completely uncontestable and agreeable?
N-no...! Da words dey make me UNCOMFY! So totally NOT wholesome chungus 420 ( >_< )

It's okay to think about what you intend to communicate before committing to a long screed nobody can pin down. In fact I'd argue it's disrespectful to the other person to make them sort through a bunch of words you haven't even committed an actual position behind them.

My mistake, my good man. I ought to strive to be more forthright in my verbiage, lest it become obfuscated and offend one's softer sensibilities.
It is indubitably the case that Graphics Interchange Formats, colloquially dubbed "GIFs", of feminine men with their derrieres in plain view, are posted on the TGstation Discord. In many such scenarios, the aforementioned men (henceforth dubbed "femboys"), are often also speaking about their inner sexual desires, often of a very plainly explicit nature. It seems quite curious to me that such presentations of overt sexual desire -- nay, of overt sexual display -- should be considered so casual in our wonderful discourses, while this "GIF," which may be, at least outwardly, less sexual, should be banned for its explicit nature. However, despite this observation, one cannot overlook the fact that the "GIF" in question here is offensive to the average man's sensibilities for other reasons - like their questionable age for instance. On these terms alone such a mute would be apprehended as justified to any but the most morally blind individual. That said, I do not believe such distinction was made in the ban reason, as it seemed to be for its sexual nature alone which, as I have argued already, is poor reasoning given the preponderance of other more explicit "femboy" "GIFs" strewn out.

I'm kinda busy rn could I get a tl;dr please?

how do you tdlr a clear cut case of psychosis

I guess I wait for sinful to take his meds and reply.

hey guys what are we talking about this is a very long quote chain

we're talking about you gettin g quoted

[Omega_DarkPotato]

i scrolled up super duper fast and sinfuls and timonks pfps merged to create a bald sinful

snipped

hey guys what are we talking about this is a very long quote chain

we're talking about you gettin g quoted

i think they were talking abt sinfuls meds

[MrStonedOne]

also @icarus please don't fly too close to the sun thanks

[Timonk]

also @icarus please don't fly too close to the sun thanks

ikarrus has not visited the forums in years

[BlueMemesauce]

"Change yourself"

kek

[sinfulbliss]

the character’s age has zero relevancy here you are actually insane. nobody wants to see a character getting fucking face raped with goo being shoved down their throat and Transformed

exactly the issue my friend, the sexual content allowed is based on what people WANT to see, not whether it’s sexually explicit or not

[Timonk]

i want to see femboys sticking their asses out

[datorangebottle]

WHAT IN THE NAME OF GENERAL RICHARDSON DO YOU THINK YOU'RE POSTING, MAGGOT?! YOUR PATHETIC EXCUSE FOR INTERNET BROWSING HAS TURNED YOUR BRAIN INTO MUSH!

Sorry, the only thing I heard was
Welcome to Camp Navarro! So, you're the new replacement...You are out of uniform, soldier! WHERE IS YOUR POWER ARMOR?!

the character’s age has zero relevancy here you are actually insane. nobody wants to see a character getting fucking face raped with goo being shoved down their throat and Transformed

exactly the issue my friend, the sexual content allowed is based on what people WANT to see, not whether it’s sexually explicit or not

I'm pretty sure that even if straight-up uncropped vanilla porn was posted, the poster would be banned. Or at least warned, and the post deleted.

[Timonk]

oh and omega if youre still reading this thread can you post exactly how many of my messages you have deleted in recent time since i cant view the audit log when im muted apparently

[Omega_DarkPotato]

oh and omega if youre still reading this thread can you post exactly how many of my messages you have deleted in recent time since i cant view the audit log when im muted apparently

Good question! Audit logs on discord rapidly decay past a month, unfortunately, but I can give you the timeouts you've gotten - which were a lot less than I remembered, so for what it's worth you're in a less-bad-off position than I thought you were (though this most recent event still isn't good)
featuring all but the most recent one, because it's got inaccurate info in that timeout line.

[MrStonedOne]

i can quickly tell you how many total deleted messages were by you, but this counts both self deletes and moderator deletes, and doesn't track deletes on messages more than a pageful away:

136

9 from this year
41 from last year
49 from the year before that.

[sinfulbliss]

Armhulen how do you warn me for making fun of someone in response to them making fun of me? Deranged.

[Armhulen]

Sinful you have died on this hill before I stg

This is potato's post

ERM...! OMG! HE SAID SO MANY WORDS THAT OFFEND MY WITTLE EAWDWUMS! OWCHIES!
What's that you say? His overall point was actually something completely uncontestable and agreeable?
N-no...! Da words dey make me UNCOMFY! So totally NOT wholesome chungus 420 ( >_< )

This is your post

[sinfulbliss]

Sinful you have died on this hill before I stg

This is potato's post

ERM...! OMG! HE SAID SO MANY WORDS THAT OFFEND MY WITTLE EAWDWUMS! OWCHIES!
What's that you say? His overall point was actually something completely uncontestable and agreeable?
N-no...! Da words dey make me UNCOMFY! So totally NOT wholesome chungus 420 ( >_< )

This is your post

Thank you for the illuminating explanation. I was blind, but now I see.

[Super Aggro Crag]

is that why your avatar wears sunglasses

[Timonk]

which were a lot less than I remembered, so for what it's worth you're in a less-bad-off position than I thought you were (though this most recent event still isn't good)

So you have misjudged the situation to some extent 2 times (including the one in DMs where you edited the note to not say that Colin is underage anymore) and it is not worth a reduction?

Not that I can do anything about it anymore since you referred me to the headmins so quick after which i got dumpstered by MSO

[Pandarsenic]

Another victim of posting in own peanut

[Omega_DarkPotato]

which were a lot less than I remembered, so for what it's worth you're in a less-bad-off position than I thought you were (though this most recent event still isn't good)

So you have misjudged the situation to some extent 2 times (including the one in DMs where you edited the note to not say that Colin is underage anymore) and it is not worth a reduction?

No, because it doesn't change the post you made :P
Just the warning after that you're on your last legs - you now have a few extra legs there.

[Timonk]

oh hell yea i took a trip to chernobyl and now i have more than 2 legs

[Omega_DarkPotato]

get 2 more and you can become an insect
2 more after that and become an arthropod
2 more after that and become a crab (cool)
90 more after that and become a centipede (less cool)
900 more after that and become a millipede (significantly less cool)
theres no more milestones after 1,000 legs i think

[Armhulen]

millipedes are cool though

[dirk_mcblade]

You become Vishnu when the limbs become uncountable

[Armhulen]

countable infinities can't become uncountable bro