defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
Forum rules
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
User avatar
iwishforducks
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:48 pm
Byond Username: Iwishforducks

defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by iwishforducks » #648307

Bottom post of the previous page:

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=32192

fourth thread created for this. giving this 2 days before you guys go insane in the replies and get this one locked like the others
im gay (and also play the moth “bugger”)
carshalash
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2017 4:57 am
Byond Username: Carshalash

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by carshalash » #648364

XII3912 wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:55 am
carshalash wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:51 am

Didn't you post weird gay porn gifs in the tg discord and get banned for it, and then proceed to join the manuelcord and do the exact same thing? Sounds like you're the one posting sexual material across servers m8.
The manuelcord? He never even joined the manuel cord from what I know.
Image

You two lie a lot. This situation is a glorified ban request in video form, ban requests should be available to either everyone or nobody.
User avatar
TheSmallBlue
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2019 3:55 pm
Byond Username: SmallBlue

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by TheSmallBlue » #648365

Imitates-The-Lizards wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:58 am I won't touch the lolicon bit - it's clear everyone here disagrees with me on that one, and it would just lead to a long streaming shitshow that would give poor Mothblocks an aneurysm. I got my forum warning for that one already.

I already explained why my character age was set to 17, and why I was naked - it was for actual in-game mechanical reasons - ask anyone on sybil who plays at the same time as me if I steal people's shoes to be a menace all the time or not - they'll tell you yes.

And when I argued for less-strict ERP rules, even in their video with the out of context quotes, it was clearly said alongside the fact that I felt it was silly in conjunction with the fact that we're an over-18 server. I am very clearly pro "consenting adults" ERP.

I don't know what else to say other than that you're clearly seeing the work of someone setting up a hit piece. I'm sure if I was as obsessed as the people who made that video, I could probably make you look bad too if I tried hard enough, so I'm asking for your continued support in this matter.
What I'm trying to say is that, even WITH context, the combination of all the things I mentioned do paint you in a pretty bad (horrible) light. If it was one, justified event, sure, but when multiple events add to a horrible assumption, at that point even with the context and explanations it'll be seen as too much of a coincidence.
And uh you won't have my continued support, I dont wanna support a lolicon defender. I'm just trying to be fair to both sides.

Also, if EVERYONE disagrees with you on something- EVERYONE. Then maybe just maybe you might just be wrong?
When human I go by Bluti Kabooti, when AI I go by Azure
Image
Comm from
User avatar
XII3912
Joined: Sun May 08, 2022 9:21 am
Byond Username: EMX55

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by XII3912 » #648367

Holy fuck he actually did it, based
Imitates-The-Lizards
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2021 2:28 am
Byond Username: Typhnox

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by Imitates-The-Lizards » #648368

TheSmallBlue wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:45 amnor have I seen you deny that you're a lolicon in the first place.
Sorry for the double response on one post here, but I can respond to this actually -

Since you asked, I'm not a lolicon. I like tomboys, actually. I believe I said this in one of my original forum posts on this particular matter. Saying anything beyond that though, and I risk mr. RaveRadbury's wrath, sorry.
Image
Image
toemas
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2020 7:55 pm
Byond Username: Realthoman_

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by toemas » #648369

carshalash wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:04 am
XII3912 wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:55 am
carshalash wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:51 am

Didn't you post weird gay porn gifs in the tg discord and get banned for it, and then proceed to join the manuelcord and do the exact same thing? Sounds like you're the one posting sexual material across servers m8.
The manuelcord? He never even joined the manuel cord from what I know.
Image

You two lie a lot. This situation is a glorified ban request in video form, ban requests should be available to either everyone or nobody.
lol
User avatar
XII3912
Joined: Sun May 08, 2022 9:21 am
Byond Username: EMX55

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by XII3912 » #648370

carshalash wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:55 am


Didn't you purposefully try to get the tgcord pulled by posting guides on how to make real bombs?
Not just me but Philip aswell why exactly do you feel the need attempt to incriminate him?

And do you genuinely think that the meth bait and switch I posted was posted to take down the tg cord or nah. If so I actually would like to know why you think that
carshalash
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2017 4:57 am
Byond Username: Carshalash

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by carshalash » #648372

XII3912 wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:32 am
carshalash wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:55 am


Didn't you purposefully try to get the tgcord pulled by posting guides on how to make real bombs?
Not just me but Philip aswell why exactly do you feel the need attempt to incriminate him?

And do you genuinely think that the meth bait and switch I posted was posted to take down the tg cord or nah. If so I actually would like to know why you think that
Thoman shouldn't be the only person with the ability to make ban requests, especially considering his past behaviour.

And you? I just don't like you.
User avatar
XII3912
Joined: Sun May 08, 2022 9:21 am
Byond Username: EMX55

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by XII3912 » #648374

>Thoman shouldn't be the only person with the ability to make ban requests, especially considering his past behaviour.

It was not Thomas who did it, it was somebody else entirely not sure what made you think it was him who made the "ban he" video






>And you? I just don't like you.


So you admit to spreading a lie about another user because you dislike them. I mean we don't even know each other bro but C'est la vie ig
toemas
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2020 7:55 pm
Byond Username: Realthoman_

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by toemas » #648376

carshalash wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:55 am Thoman shouldn't be the only person with the ability to make ban requests, especially considering his past behaviour
I didn't make anything
carshalash
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2017 4:57 am
Byond Username: Carshalash

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by carshalash » #648377

XII3912 wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:44 am >Thoman shouldn't be the only person with the ability to make ban requests, especially considering his past behaviour.

It was not Thomas who did it, it was somebody else entirely not sure what made you think it was him who made the "ban he" video






>And you? I just don't like you.


So you admit to spreading a lie about another user because you dislike them. I mean we don't even know each other bro but C'est la vie ig

This is your ban reason, is it not?
"Banned from the server permanently - Over Discord, created several Rule 11 breaking posts and videos on how to make illegal substances and chemical weapons that needed to be reported to Discord trust and safety. When your name came up in discussion, the overall feedback was that admins were absolutely sick of you. Your note history adjusted for your time played is abysmal, so I'm taking this route to just remove you from the community altogether."
A FUN part of your appeal for this ban stuck out to me, particularly MSO's response to it.

Image

The server host told you to knock it off with spamming racist memes. So what do you do in the manuel discord since it's the only place that will begrudgingly accept you?

Image

Your weird gang shouldn't be the only people with the power to use ban requests just because it's in video format, it sets a terrible precedent.
toemas
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2020 7:55 pm
Byond Username: Realthoman_

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by toemas » #648379

carshalash wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:58 am Your weird gang shouldn't be the only people with the power to use ban requests just because it's in video format, it sets a terrible precedent.
I think that not banning them would have set a worse precedent. Also, there is no gang lol
User avatar
XII3912
Joined: Sun May 08, 2022 9:21 am
Byond Username: EMX55

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by XII3912 » #648380

carshalash wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:58 am
Your weird gang shouldn't be the only people with the power to use ban requests just because it's in video format, it sets a terrible precedent.

What gang tho it was one person, one guy who i do not know very well there is no "weird gang" here ill explain to you what happened so you understand it better, so from phase 1

>alice defends lolicon in another thread
>thoman responds and tells them to kill themselves
>thoman is banned from the forums and his appeal gets denied
>kleinworks corporation the youtuber makes a video a few days later which exposes them as a pedo
>video is then posted and they are then lynched in the discord based on Alice's appeal
>they are then banned from the discord

So yes it's down to one guy not a gang. There are many people agreeing with the ban but does that make them apart of the so called "gang" no it doesn't. you can bring up past atrocities if you'd like to but know that the video was just one guy
Last edited by XII3912 on Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:00 am, edited 3 times in total.
Shellton(Mario)
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 5:43 pm
Byond Username: Sheltton

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by Shellton(Mario) » #648384

Whoever you think it was I don't think we should be allowing people to start a witch hunt on whoever they want at any time they want. Instead go through the proper channels. I.E Bring it up to an admin or something.

Am not even going to start on the pedo accusations as that is the out of the realm of my sanity and can only really be answered through an investigation.
User avatar
Lacran
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:17 am
Byond Username: Lacran

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by Lacran » #648386

What the fuck are you retards even talking about
User avatar
XII3912
Joined: Sun May 08, 2022 9:21 am
Byond Username: EMX55

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by XII3912 » #648387

Lacran wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:02 am What the fuck are you retards even talking about
We went from the age of consent to "is he bad or is he good" then we went to "hey look at these 2 they have committed atrocities in the past"
User avatar
dirk_mcblade
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2020 7:54 am
Byond Username: Dirk_McBlade

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by dirk_mcblade » #648388

Imitates-The-Lizards wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:58 am
And when I argued for less-strict ERP rules, even in their video with the out of context quotes, it was clearly said alongside the fact that I felt it was silly in conjunction with the fact that we're an over-18 server. I am very clearly pro "consenting adults" ERP.
It's an over-18 server but it's also a don't ask don't tell server because the admins don't want to encourage doxing.

If you don't understand how the combination of these two things plus what you're talking about is problematic, I don't know man.
User avatar
Lacran
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:17 am
Byond Username: Lacran

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by Lacran » #648389

Does the person in question have a history of pedo sympathizing or something?
Imitates-The-Lizards
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2021 2:28 am
Byond Username: Typhnox

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by Imitates-The-Lizards » #648390

dirk_mcblade wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:07 am
Imitates-The-Lizards wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:58 am
And when I argued for less-strict ERP rules, even in their video with the out of context quotes, it was clearly said alongside the fact that I felt it was silly in conjunction with the fact that we're an over-18 server. I am very clearly pro "consenting adults" ERP.
It's an over-18 server but it's also a don't ask don't tell server because the admins don't want to encourage doxing.

If you don't understand how the combination of these two things plus what you're talking about is problematic, I don't know man.
If they don't want to encourage doxxing, then my ban should be immediately overturned, with prejudice, because what this ban is showing that if you take the time to dig into people posts on the forums and discord, and look into every little detail about them you can find, you can get them banned if you don't like them.
Image
Image
User avatar
Lacran
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:17 am
Byond Username: Lacran

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by Lacran » #648391

Imitates, can you explain why you want erotic content on a platform where the vast majority don't want to engage with it especially when you are also holding positions on sexuality that is at best, very borderline?

Why is this your chosen hill to die on?
Imitates-The-Lizards
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2021 2:28 am
Byond Username: Typhnox

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by Imitates-The-Lizards » #648392

Lacran wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:24 am Imitates, can you explain why you want erotic content on a platform where the vast majority don't want to engage with it while you also holding positions on sexuality that is at best, very borderline?

Why is this your chosen hill to die on?
I'm sorry, I can't get into this topic here, Mr. RaveRadbury would rip me a new one. I already got a forum warning for this before.
Image
Image
User avatar
Lacran
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:17 am
Byond Username: Lacran

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by Lacran » #648393

Ah ok, wasn't trying to banbait
User avatar
Thunder11
In-Game Admin
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 12:55 pm
Byond Username: Thunder12345
Github Username: Thunder12345
Location: Scotland, UK

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by Thunder11 » #648394

XII3912 wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:03 am
Lacran wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:02 am What the fuck are you retards even talking about
We went from the age of consent to "is he bad or is he good" then we went to "hey look at these 2 they have committed atrocities in the past"
The worst atrocity of all is this thread
ImageImage
Spoiler:
IcePacks wrote:
MrFoster wrote:Back in my day, we didn't complain about lag! We used it to queue attacks!
That's thinking on your feet, soldier!
Quality Paprika from #coderbus wrote:[11:35.52] <paprika> holy crap so yeah i don't care about your opinion at all
oranges wrote:
Excuse me? Thats for sensible and calm rational debate, not for senseless whining.
Resident Catmin, please direct catposting to: https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=5578
User avatar
XII3912
Joined: Sun May 08, 2022 9:21 am
Byond Username: EMX55

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by XII3912 » #648396

Thunder11 wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 11:01 am
XII3912 wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:03 am
Lacran wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:02 am What the fuck are you retards even talking about
We went from the age of consent to "is he bad or is he good" then we went to "hey look at these 2 they have committed atrocities in the past"
The worst atrocity of all is this thread
Agreed mop this up jannies
User avatar
Qbmax32
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 4:05 am
Byond Username: Qbmax32
Github Username: qbmax32
Location: in your walls

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by Qbmax32 » #648404

Just more proof on why cat players are the worst thing to happen to the server in years
my admin feedback thread


quotes
Spoiler:
wesoda25 wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 5:02 am Qbmax32 is quite literally one of the dumbest individuals I have ever had the misfortune of coming into contact with. He has zero redeemable traits, and honestly I have to suppress my gag reflex every time he shows up in a conversation.
Malkraz wrote:YES
DRINK THE PISS QB
angelstarri wrote:qbmax is a retard
imsxz wrote:mythic please stop you’ve hit rock bottom and you KEEP DIGGING
deedubya wrote:I'll defend to the death your right to scream "NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER" on a constant basis, but I'll also equally defend the right of people to call you a fuckin' pillock for doing it.
datorangebottle wrote:what, not having to act like customer service in a volunteer customer service position?

Here's a rebuttal: you're literally in a customer service slash celebrity position. Volunteer or not.
Malkraz wrote:can you stop posting this shit
Nalzul wrote:Fuck Blob (can you imagine how hot it would be to be gangbanged by a bunch of blobbernauts, the blob, and spores)
Wyzack wrote:qbmax your pathetic display of abhorrent burgercraft has brought shame onto the omnivores
Plapatin wrote:i AM the senate
BONERMASTER wrote:I am a big thinker, and it would only be logical if my character had a big head as well. And glasses. Because only people that think, wear glasses.
feem wrote:i tried to send canisters of urine to the station but ended up turning all oxygen into urine and breaking lavaland and also breathing
Anonmare wrote:Each post in this thread can't settle on what it wants to be, but yet, each one is more cursed than the last.
Beesting12 wrote:please write an apology to this forums, this community, the host, and the internet as a whole for the data storage space you wasted with this complaint.
Vile Beggar wrote:i don't like this thread
imsxz wrote:nervore
FantasticFwoosh wrote:I will whisper sweet nothings that will confuse and perhaps scare you a little, but enhance the experience no-less.
afelinidisfinetoo wrote:By the way, the person who posted that catgirl porn on the github page was me. If anyone wants my private stash just PM me
Nervere wrote:Anything for a femoid.....
Qbopper wrote:I'm a dumb poopy butthead
CitrusGender wrote:god i love it when people feed me my own fried legs
User avatar
dirk_mcblade
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2020 7:54 am
Byond Username: Dirk_McBlade

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by dirk_mcblade » #648408

Imitates-The-Lizards wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:15 am
dirk_mcblade wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:07 am
Imitates-The-Lizards wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:58 am
And when I argued for less-strict ERP rules, even in their video with the out of context quotes, it was clearly said alongside the fact that I felt it was silly in conjunction with the fact that we're an over-18 server. I am very clearly pro "consenting adults" ERP.
It's an over-18 server but it's also a don't ask don't tell server because the admins don't want to encourage doxing.

If you don't understand how the combination of these two things plus what you're talking about is problematic, I don't know man.
If they don't want to encourage doxxing, then my ban should be immediately overturned, with prejudice, because what this ban is showing that if you take the time to dig into people posts on the forums and discord, and look into every little detail about them you can find, you can get them banned if you don't like them.
I'm not going to bother looking up the evidence because to be honest I don't care aside from this thread appearing in one of two forums I read.

However I doubt they doxxed you. It sounds to me like they looked through your chat history so if anything you doxxed yourself.

Furthermore unless they posted your driver's license or home ownership records that's not the doxing I'm talking about. The admins are talking about not wanting people to send them people's identification documents to prove they're under 18, that kind of bullshit. I'm pretty sure the policy explains it as such. If they actually did what I'm talking about then that's a bannable offense but again I doubt that's what's going on.

Getting banned from discord is a minor penalty. You could consider this your "come to Jesus" moment where you sit back for a moment and reflect why people are getting the perception you're acting strange and either work on that if you're merely a severe contrarian or get some professional help if you have some other problem going on. Talking about it further online seems non productive though it's cheap entertainment for the rest of us watching people sperg out.
User avatar
KniraTwo
Joined: Wed May 18, 2022 1:11 am
Byond Username: Knira

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by KniraTwo » #648411

Shellton(Mario) wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 9:43 am Whoever you think it was I don't think we should be allowing people to start a witch hunt on whoever they want at any time they want. Instead go through the proper channels. I.E Bring it up to an admin or something.

Am not even going to start on the pedo accusations as that is the out of the realm of my sanity and can only really be answered through an investigation.
based take
Image
Turbonerd
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2022 3:18 pm
Byond Username: AccountName5

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by Turbonerd » #648412

I think the situation would've been a lot better if everyone that talked about it got muted, while admins investigate and people have a normal conversation.
User avatar
BONERMASTER
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2018 2:28 pm
Byond Username: BONERMASTER

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by BONERMASTER » #648414

Imitates-The-Lizards wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:22 am The age of consent should be 25 because that's when brain development stops.
I think your brain stopped developing a long time before that, if you seriously believe this crap that you are peddling.

Now we can close the thread.


With consensual regards
-BONERMASTER
SIGNATURE UNDER CONSTRUCTION

*YOUR ADVERTISEMENT COULD BE HERE* - Contact BONERMASTER & Associates for further information
User avatar
Rohen_Tahir
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:00 pm
Byond Username: Rohen Tahir
Location: Primary fool storage
Contact:

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by Rohen_Tahir » #648415

lol
Image
User avatar
Qbmax32
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 4:05 am
Byond Username: Qbmax32
Github Username: qbmax32
Location: in your walls

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by Qbmax32 » #648417

Rohen_Tahir wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 2:06 pmlol
my admin feedback thread


quotes
Spoiler:
wesoda25 wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 5:02 am Qbmax32 is quite literally one of the dumbest individuals I have ever had the misfortune of coming into contact with. He has zero redeemable traits, and honestly I have to suppress my gag reflex every time he shows up in a conversation.
Malkraz wrote:YES
DRINK THE PISS QB
angelstarri wrote:qbmax is a retard
imsxz wrote:mythic please stop you’ve hit rock bottom and you KEEP DIGGING
deedubya wrote:I'll defend to the death your right to scream "NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER" on a constant basis, but I'll also equally defend the right of people to call you a fuckin' pillock for doing it.
datorangebottle wrote:what, not having to act like customer service in a volunteer customer service position?

Here's a rebuttal: you're literally in a customer service slash celebrity position. Volunteer or not.
Malkraz wrote:can you stop posting this shit
Nalzul wrote:Fuck Blob (can you imagine how hot it would be to be gangbanged by a bunch of blobbernauts, the blob, and spores)
Wyzack wrote:qbmax your pathetic display of abhorrent burgercraft has brought shame onto the omnivores
Plapatin wrote:i AM the senate
BONERMASTER wrote:I am a big thinker, and it would only be logical if my character had a big head as well. And glasses. Because only people that think, wear glasses.
feem wrote:i tried to send canisters of urine to the station but ended up turning all oxygen into urine and breaking lavaland and also breathing
Anonmare wrote:Each post in this thread can't settle on what it wants to be, but yet, each one is more cursed than the last.
Beesting12 wrote:please write an apology to this forums, this community, the host, and the internet as a whole for the data storage space you wasted with this complaint.
Vile Beggar wrote:i don't like this thread
imsxz wrote:nervore
FantasticFwoosh wrote:I will whisper sweet nothings that will confuse and perhaps scare you a little, but enhance the experience no-less.
afelinidisfinetoo wrote:By the way, the person who posted that catgirl porn on the github page was me. If anyone wants my private stash just PM me
Nervere wrote:Anything for a femoid.....
Qbopper wrote:I'm a dumb poopy butthead
CitrusGender wrote:god i love it when people feed me my own fried legs
User avatar
Vekter
In-Game Admin
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:25 pm
Byond Username: Vekter
Location: Fucking around with the engine.

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by Vekter » #648421

this thread sucks
AliasTakuto wrote: Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:11 pm As for the ear replacing stuff, you can ask Anne but I don't think this is what I was banned for. If I was all I can say is "Sorry for being hilarious"...
Omega_DarkPotato wrote:This sucks, dude.
Spoiler:
Reply PM from-REDACTED/(REDACTED): i tried to remove the bruises by changing her gender

PM: Bluespace->Delaron: Nobody wants a mime's asscheeks farting on their brig windows.

PM: REDACTED->HotelBravoLima: Oh come on, knowing that these are hostile aliens is metagaming

[17:43] <Aranclanos> any other question ping me again
[17:43] <Vekter> Aranclanos for nicest coder 2015
[17:44] <Aranclanos> fuck you
User avatar
CPTANT
Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 1:31 pm
Byond Username: CPTANT

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by CPTANT » #648422

What did he even say about Lolicon in the first place?
Timberpoes wrote: Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:21 pm The rules exist to create the biggest possible chance of a cool shift of SS13. They don't exist to allow admins to create the most boring interpretation of SS13.
Turbonerd
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2022 3:18 pm
Byond Username: AccountName5

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by Turbonerd » #648424

Vekter wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 3:25 pm this thread sucks
User avatar
Not-Dorsidarf
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:14 pm
Byond Username: Dorsidwarf
Location: We're all going on an, admin holiday

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by Not-Dorsidarf » #648426

CPTANT wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 3:29 pm What did he even say about Lolicon in the first place?
Anarcho-capitalist, connect the dots
Image
Image
kieth4 wrote: infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo
There is a lot of very bizarre nonsense being talked on this forum. I shall now remain silent and logoff until my points are vindicated.
Player who complainted over being killed for looting cap office wrote: Sun Jul 30, 2023 1:33 am Hey there, I'm Virescent, the super evil person who made the stupid appeal and didn't think it through enough. Just came here to say: screech, retards. Screech and writhe like the worms you are. Your pathetic little cries will keep echoing around for a while before quietting down. There is one great outcome from this: I rised up the blood pressure of some of you shitheads and lowered your lifespan. I'm honestly tempted to do this more often just to see you screech and writhe more, but that wouldn't be cool of me. So come on haters, show me some more of your high blood pressure please. 🖕🖕🖕
User avatar
iwishforducks
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:48 pm
Byond Username: Iwishforducks

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Post by iwishforducks » #648427

Alright folks. You can't even be granted 6 hours without resorting to whatever the fuck this is.

The ban was not because some insufferable spoiled brats began banging drums in the discord or "giving into the mob." The ban was because admins supported the ban of Imitates/Alice long before you guys ever started to fling shit around.

The entirety of this ban is focused upon Discord, because Discord Jannies were completely absent on the discussion of Imitates/Alice a month ago. And to be honest, I'm not quite sure why the discord ban wasn't mirrored over. Only a limited amount of us actually have forum permissions or proper training (something Mothblocks is pushing to fix)

Locking this thread so you mongrels stop digging a deeper hole.
im gay (and also play the moth “bugger”)
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AnonymousForumUser, PapaMichael