Bomb Policy II: Electric Boogaloo

User avatar
Oldman Robustin
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 2:18 pm
Byond Username: ForcefulCJS

Bomb Policy II: Electric Boogaloo

Post by Oldman Robustin » #129167

Bottom post of the previous page:

The admin divergence on bomb policy at this point is entering "gross negligence" levels. Pretty much every admin has a different opinion on when bombs are bannable. Not just mild difference either, like fundamentally difference understandings of our policy.

First ban was for failing to bomb a blob core, which had already been bombed by another player (i.e. it was a giant space crater with a blob in it), after I yelled for everyone to GTFO for around two minutes. Turns out coders had secretely made blob cores immune to bombs, wew. https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=4959

It was quickly repealed but now I'm banned again for actually successfully bombing a hostile LICH WIZARD because it claimed too many bystanders and the wizard hadn't killed enough people to justify a bomb.

I'm just floored by this shit. Bombing a wizard is already considered pretty standard fare, bombing a LICH is widely understood to be the ONLY way to prevent the immortal jackass from doing whatever he wants. Good liches will ensure their cooldown is always ready when electing to fight the crew, skellies have a slew of benefits that make them immune to other anti-wiz tactics.

I'm just baffled as to what our policy is at this point. Am I supposed to be a psychic bomber who knows the antag's precise bodycount, spell selection, and ultimate goals before detonating? Why the fuck do we even have shit like liches if you're going to ban people for bombing them before they've reached a sufficient kill count? Was I supposed to be able to tell which people had been killed by the wizard versus the slaughter demon?

This utter lack of policy on the station's most potent weapon is really, really inexcusable. Especially after I made a thread months ago trying to ask the same questions and never getting a decisive answer.
Image
User avatar
imblyings
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:42 pm
Byond Username: Ausops
Location: >using suit sensors

Re: Bomb Policy II: Electric Boogaloo

Post by imblyings » #131365

There was a round recently where an ei nath lich was playing in the same round that oldman was making bombs. Oldman gave out a few bombs for spess cash. The lich was eventually stunned and surrounded in the meeting room and someone other than oldman detonated a max cap to gib the wizard. They were cucked hard, the lich teleporting out in what must have been less than a second before the bomb actually blew. Around six or seven innocents died including mr robustin.

From a case by case basis, the shuttle was about to arrive soon and it was just spectacularly bad luck on the bombers part. It also gave me a chuckle since they got cucked that hard. The bomber wasn't banned.

Food for thought.

In the other hand, the lich was killed when their phylactery was destroyed and tbh it is quite possible to destroy a lich without bombs, I've seen it happen.
The patched, dusty, trimmed, feathered mantle of evil +13.
User avatar
Oldman Robustin
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 2:18 pm
Byond Username: ForcefulCJS

Re: Bomb Policy II: Electric Boogaloo

Post by Oldman Robustin » #131425

ExcessiveCobblestone wrote:Isn't that the whole point of lich though, to stop yourself from being bursted by a typical cheese tactic [IE bombs]?

I'm not a big fan of bombs because they're uncreative and can be churned out within 5 minutes, turning everything in a viewable range GG [especially when some people consistently have bombs on/in their persona, antag or not] without any actual counter [we removed telesci roundstart for the same reason]. Needless to say, I am not opposed with any policy that curbs bomb usage for antags altogether [outside of blub which damages station integrity anyways].

You should ALWAYS assume the round will continue if you kill an antag [despite my hatred for wiz mulligan]. Not sure why people find this meta but 'KILLING THE WIZ ENDS THE GAME GUYS LEMME MAXCAP HIM' is not.
Yes that's the point of lich, and you can shut down your only weakness by putting Toxins near the top of your "rooms to murderize" list.
Image
User avatar
Oldman Robustin
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 2:18 pm
Byond Username: ForcefulCJS

Re: Bomb Policy II: Electric Boogaloo

Post by Oldman Robustin » #131427

Aloraydrel wrote:Why must bombing things be the answer to everything tbh
It's not and ignorant statements like this detract from any meaningful conversation. With blob cores secretely changed to being bomb-immune, Wizards are now pretty much the only antag left where bombs are an attractive option.

Yes you can still bomb out of control cults, shadowling dens, malf AI's, and flukeflops... but the occasions where you have access to bombs, know how to make bombs, are WILLING to use those bombs as a non-antag, have clear justification for using those bombs, AND having a clear and readily identifiable target for those bombs.... well those situations are extremely rare.
imblyings wrote:There was a round recently where an ei nath lich was playing in the same round that oldman was making bombs. Oldman gave out a few bombs for spess cash. The lich was eventually stunned and surrounded in the meeting room and someone other than oldman detonated a max cap to gib the wizard. They were cucked hard, the lich teleporting out in what must have been less than a second before the bomb actually blew. Around six or seven innocents died including mr robustin.

From a case by case basis, the shuttle was about to arrive soon and it was just spectacularly bad luck on the bombers part. It also gave me a chuckle since they got cucked that hard. The bomber wasn't banned.

Food for thought.

In the other hand, the lich was killed when their phylactery was destroyed and tbh it is quite possible to destroy a lich without bombs, I've seen it happen.

Yea I posted about that earlier. I thought the guy was banned though since they weren't responding in deadchat and everyone talked about them being benned in OOC after the round. Ironically the only reason the phylactery was destroyed was because the failbomber unintentionally caught it in the blast since it was in someone's backpack.

Good that they weren't banned but still doesn't give us a clear policy since "Making the admin chuckle" as a way to avoid being banned for bombing is pretty much the definition of "I need to adminwho before setting this bomb off" because some people might chuckle while others will have a throbbing banhammer waiting for you.
Image
User avatar
CPTANT
Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 1:31 pm
Byond Username: CPTANT

Re: Bomb Policy II: Electric Boogaloo

Post by CPTANT » #131437

So is there anyone that thinks non-antags set off too many bombs?

Because in my opinion it is happens very rarely anyway.
Timberpoes wrote: Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:21 pm The rules exist to create the biggest possible chance of a cool shift of SS13. They don't exist to allow admins to create the most boring interpretation of SS13.
User avatar
metacide
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:27 am
Byond Username: Metacide

Re: Bomb Policy II: Electric Boogaloo

Post by metacide » #131511

Yeah, I never really see station crew use bombs. Wizard rounds sound like the ideal time because they're stupid meme bollocks that no one cares about anyway.
MetaStation is currently running by vote or by default on both Sibyl and Basil
Feedback and suggestions are welcome in the MetaStation thread
User avatar
Takeguru
Joined: Wed May 07, 2014 5:20 pm
Byond Username: TakeGuru

Re: Bomb Policy II: Electric Boogaloo

Post by Takeguru » #131574

They don't use bombs because some admins are far too trigger-happy on banning for using bombs.
Image
callanrockslol
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 1:47 pm
Byond Username: Callanrockslol

Re: Bomb Policy II: Electric Boogaloo

Post by callanrockslol » #131808

Maybe we should address Lich being a shit and not working properly because lolbyond
The most excessive signature on /tg/station13.

Still not even at the limit after 8 fucking years.
Spoiler:
Urist Boatmurdered [Security] asks, "Why does Zol have a captain-level ID?"
Zol Interbottom [Security] says, "because"

Sergie Borris lives on in our hearts

Zaros (No id) [145.9] says, "WITH MY SUPER WIZARD POWERS I CAN TELL CALLAN IS MAD."
Anderson Conagher wrote:Callan is sense.
Errorage wrote:When I see the win vista, win 7 and win 8 hourglass cursor, it makes me happy
Cause it's a circle spinning around
I smile and make circular motions with my finger to imiatate it
petethegoat wrote:slap a comment on it and call it a feature
MisterPerson wrote:>playing
Do you think this is a game?
Gun Hog wrote:Untested code baby
oranges wrote:for some reason all our hosts turn into bohemia software communities after they implode
Malkevin wrote:I was the only one that voted for you Callan.
Miggles wrote:>centration development
>trucking
ill believe it when snakes grow arms and strangle me with them

OOC: Aranclanos: that sounds like ooc in ooc related to ic to be ooc and confuse the ic
OOC: Dionysus24779: We're nearing a deep philosophical extistential level

Admin PM from-Jordie0608: 33-Jan-2552| Warned: Is a giraffe dork ~tony abbott

OOC: Saegrimr: That wasn't a call to pray right now callan jesus christ you're fast.

OOC: Eaglendia: Glad I got to see the rise, fall, rise, and fall of Zol

OOC: Armhulenn: CALLAN
OOC: Armhulenn: YOU MELTED MY FUCKING REVOLVER
OOC: Armhulenn: AND THEN
OOC: Armhulenn: GAVE ME MELTING MELONS
OOC: Armhulenn: GOD FUCKING BLESS YOU
OOC: Armhulenn: you know what's hilarious though
OOC: Armhulenn: I melted ANOTHER TRAITOR'S REVOLVER AFTER THAT

7/8/2016 never forget
Armhulen wrote:
John_Oxford wrote:>implying im not always right
all we're saying is that you're not crag son
bandit wrote:we already have a punishment for using our code for your game, it's called using our code for your game
The evil holoparasite user I can't believe its not DIO and his holoparasite I can't believe its not Skub have been defeated by the Spacedust Crusaders, but what has been taken from the station can never be returned.

OOC: TheGel: Literally a guy in a suit with a shuttle full of xenos. That's a doozy
lumipharon
TGMC Administrator
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 4:40 am
Byond Username: Lumipharon

Re: Bomb Policy II: Electric Boogaloo

Post by lumipharon » #131809

Lich is honestly just a very unfun game mechanic.
It's way too easy to abuse to become an utterly unkillable turbomurderboner (except for bombs, heuh).
User avatar
Steelpoint
Github User
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:37 pm
Byond Username: Steelpoint
Github Username: Steelpoint
Location: The Armoury

Re: Bomb Policy II: Electric Boogaloo

Post by Steelpoint » #131816

Lich is something that should cost 4 or 5 spell points, that would justify being nigh unkillable. You trade a lot of spell buying power to guarantee near immortality.
Image
Zilenan91
Confined to the shed
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 8:09 pm
Byond Username: Zilenan91

Re: Bomb Policy II: Electric Boogaloo

Post by Zilenan91 » #132128

Lich a shit. It also makes the hardsuit completely obsolete.
Spoiler:
Zilenan91 wrote:
Just replace both their arms with chainsaws.

HAVE FUN ESCAPING NOW WITH NO ARMS
Poorman
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 9:06 pm
Byond Username: ThePoorman

Re: Bomb Policy II: Electric Boogaloo

Post by Poorman » #132268

Bombs are fun
User avatar
Helios
Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 5:07 pm
Byond Username: Shodansbreak

Re: Bomb Policy II: Electric Boogaloo

Post by Helios » #137542

So, it's allowed or not?
bag of holding wizards is allowed or not?
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users