I'll just use this thread to defend my actions, appeal the Dayban just given to me by Longbowman, and request a secban for Saphira Fisher.
Here are the logs:
http://pastebin.com/42amKtng
Summary:
1) I'm a scientist, I want to experiment with new rare signaller types (mousetrap, voice, etc.)
2) Emily Ranger, Science Officer, comes and warns me that if she sees me taking a bomb out of science that I'll be arrested
3) Work toward getting a voice analyzer from arrivals vender
4) Joe Spacztik and some Cargo Tech roll up next to me, Joe pulls out a stunprod
5) Run away, report it
6) Offer all the details I can to Emily Ranger, Emily says she suspects we have shadowlings
7) Decide the best use of the voice analyzer would to make an implanted voice-bomb in case anyone tries to kidnap/kill me again, within discretion of course.
8) Ask roboticist to implant the bomb in me, get 'er done
9) Wait around, as I'm walking arrivals I see a bunch of unknowns in colored bandanas gathering in the locker room
10) Whip out my PDA and tell Emily that some weirdos in masks are gathering in the locker room P.S. I've got a bomb - the latter being a joke intended to mess with her a little
11) After the second message one of the dudes, a botanist, runs up and demands my ID or he'll beat me up
12) Saphira the Sec Officer runs by, and I yell for help, that I'm being robbed
13) Saphira listens to my plea and then tazes me instead, wordlessly dragging me to the brig
14) I complain on Sci Radio to Emily that my bomb reference was a joke and that, essentially, they were wasting their time while I was reporting something far more criminal/sinister. I had assumed that Emily made a request for me being arrested.
15) A search of my bag turns up a couple basic tools. Saphira won't tell me why I'm there but when I complain about the fact I had no bomb and thus no basis for arrest, she says "It's not about the bomb".
16) Emily turns up and asks about the situation. I complain some more and Emily tells Saphira to release me, Saphira asks to interrogate me and Emily allows it "but only for a few minutes".
17) Interrogation begins. We talk briefly about the bomb statement but that's not why I'm there... Saphira wants to know more about these masked men I saw.
18) After roughly 10 minutes in interrogation, telling her everything that I saw, she insists I haven't told her enough and begins the batoning/pepperspraying/threatening schtick to get me to talk
19) I refuse to talk anymore, tell her I've said everything, and that she's being shit for continuing to hold me
20) The intimidation continues, I finally get tired of playing along and yell on radio for someone to let me out.
21) Saphira takes my radio and continues to threaten/baton/spray me.
22) Tell her I'm done talking, that she's shit, fuck you, etc.
23) She says its going to get painful,
"That the Gulag is going unused these days", etc.
24) Tell her multiple times I've said everything I know
25) She drags me out of interogation, I yell at an officer passing by and but they ignore me.
26) Saphira throws the Gulag gear on me, drags me onto the shuttle
27) Make one last threat that she'll die if she takes me to Gulag, no sign of her backing down
28) As soon as we arrive at Gulag I detonate the bomb
29) Despite Saphira's statement (and my reasonable belief) that Gulag was empty, one prisoner was inside. They survived the blast but used the opportunity to look for a way out and died from exposure.
30) Got bwoinked by Phil235, told my story, didn't hear back
31) Got bwoinked later by Longbowman, tell my story, Longbowman tosses me a dayban for blowing myself up as a non-antag and taking others in the process (Ok it's not otherS, its singular, one guy who walked into the bomb blast site presumably for a way out of the Gulag hellhole and died from exposure).
Conclusion:
This isn't a cut and dry case by any means, but while my judgment isn't always perfect, I've been here long enough to get a good sense of the rules. Bombs are a touchy subject with a huge lack of clarity around their rules, but considering just the prior round someone had murdered the HoS at Gulag out of revenge, I felt that I was within my right to kill this security officer. I had no reason to believe I would ever be allowed to leave Gulag, the only person who even KNEW I was at Gulag was the officer and she explicitly stated "I have bigger fish to fry", leaving me to believe I'd be left there to rot while the station dealt with shadowlings or whatever. She also explicitly said the Gulag had been unused, and I had no reason to believe that bombing the Gulag shuttle while it was docked at the Gulag would cause any significant collateral damage. This was my last resort, I was going to be taken out of the round because of a rogue sec officer, so I wanted to(and had every right to) take them with me.
Drawing a line on this issue of what is/isn't acceptable here would be helpful, but at the very least I don't think Saphira has any business playing security. The willingness to escalate a series of questioning about me being a VICTIM into tossing said VICTIM into the gulag for not conjuring up some mysterious information I was apparently withholding ruined my round and that attitude is going to ruin many more rounds until someone steps in and says "This is not fucking ok". The fact she talked in deadchat about my reputation, made this thread a "powergaming" issue, and made other statements indicating metagrudge only solidifies that she should not be playing sec roles.
Edit: Since Emily Ranger hasn't posted here yet, I'll pass along what she said in OOC the following round, which is consistent with what happened in-game.
Emily had no clue what happened to me (confirming that sec was not informed of my status or any efforts to Gulag me) and that she had not made any concerted effort to get me arrested, indicating that this was either raw metagrudging or a complete nutjob playing security who thinks arresting, abusing, and gulag'ing crime victims because they gave you attitude is somehow acceptable. The fact that the OP deliberately excluded virtually every relevant fact weighing against him/her just shows that they have absolutely no interest in a fair/honest assessment of what happened.