Banrequest: Juggernaut 593 and Artificer 465 (Wizard round)

Requests which have been closed
Locked
Amelius
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 3:29 am
Byond Username: Amelius

Banrequest: Juggernaut 593 and Artificer 465 (Wizard round)

Post by Amelius » #19578

Your byond account: Amelius
Your character name: Kebab Remover 9000.
Their character names: Juggernaut 593, Artificer (465)
Their byond account(optional, but useful if you can provide it): Unsure of.
Server and time: Sybil. Round ending 5:25 PM EST~ish.
Logs and/or screenshots: http://pastebin.com/d7EWNKvt. Jugg 593 halfway down, and again after the machine learning alert. Artificer 465 near the end.

Description of what happened: 593 attacked it's master (the wizard, that is), dressed plainly in the same clothing and ID that I wore the entire round, several times until he was ultimately destroyed as a liability. No explanation in OOC afterward was provided, no words were exchanged beforehand. It is possible he was created by another individual, but I didn't have time to adminhelp during the round to be sure.

465 also attacked it's master a couple times out of spite after I created him in cargo, refused to create a soul stone and ran away out of spite.

Why they should be banned: Attacking their master as a construct in both cases, one as a definite intended murder attempt, and the other out of sheer spite, is blatantly unacceptable and a rule 1 violation. The latter also disobeyed direct orders and fucked off after attacking, which betrays the whole idea of 'constructs are slaved to their masters'.
User avatar
cedarbridge
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
Byond Username: Cedarbridge

Re: Banrequest: Juggernaut 593 and Artificer 465 (Wizard rou

Post by cedarbridge » #19591

I was the ghost that ahelped these incidents. I can vouch for the OPs story.
User avatar
elyina
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:30 pm
Byond Username: Elyina
Location: burning in hell for my sins

Re: Banrequest: Juggernaut 593 and Artificer 465 (Wizard rou

Post by elyina » #20048

the logs are good enough evidence here, they'e both received bans.
Image
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users