Bottom post of the previous page:
Oh please, if we liberally banned for rule 1 violations then security would be non-exsistant and antagonists would do nothing hostile.There's a difference between doing your job and going over the top.
Bottom post of the previous page:
Oh please, if we liberally banned for rule 1 violations then security would be non-exsistant and antagonists would do nothing hostile.Given that the actual space law books point to the space law page for the wiki, I'd say it has a pretty damn big effect on gameplay as it means Security just gets to make up their own laws to enforce every round, or their job is solely to valid hunt and not give a shit about the regular crew and petty crimes of the station.Shaps wrote:Well technically it is a wiki issue and never had any effect on gameplay
Plus it's back anyway now so I'm not really sure what the net change was here
Nice thing about wiki's is you can undo page vandalism with the click of the button.FantasticFwoosh wrote: nobody now could now even identify what they did wrong because the means was just destroyed perhaps irreparably in original detail (it was one of the finer areas of the wiki i must say, it would be a disservice to try and repair it with my mere mortal hands)
[/size]
kosmos wrote:I will keep undoing the page removal until you'll remove my wiki admin status.
Could you offer a detailed statement as to how this violates those if you would please?Hornygranny wrote:Because it's not part of the server rules, and can't be relied upon to play without getting in trouble.kosmos wrote:I will keep undoing the page removal until you'll remove my wiki admin status.
Like what?Hornygranny wrote:Because it's not part of the server rules, and can't be relied upon to play without getting in trouble.kosmos wrote:I will keep undoing the page removal until you'll remove my wiki admin status.
Shitty stance to take, tbh.Hornygranny wrote:This sound like a topic for you to discuss with the new headmins in the coming weeks.
Hornygranny wrote:For the record, Lollerderby and I made a majority decision to remove the page. This sound like a topic for you to discuss with the new headmins in the coming weeks.
Kek indeed.Ikarrus wrote:Kek.
It's election time so just lobby the new heamins to change it back.
Being a dick is subjective.newfren wrote:hey malk i found the other rule that stops that one from being a problemMalkevin wrote:Fine, I'll correct myselfMalkevin wrote:Awesome, now everything can be a major crime. Ten minutes for everyone.
1. Don't be a dick.
It was actually removed from the page for around nine months until I noticed it at the end of last year.Cheimon wrote:So, why does it hurt the rules? There was always a big banner across the top, saying it was a "roleplay suggestion".
Where is the history? It looks like its been removed.... (I looked at it a week ago at least to compare it)Hornygranny wrote:It was actually removed from the page for around nine months until I noticed it at the end of last year.Cheimon wrote:So, why does it hurt the rules? There was always a big banner across the top, saying it was a "roleplay suggestion".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users