Dax Dupont wrote:post
Having a flash during rev is your fault and justified for killing. However, this was not why he was killed (or at least explained in
any post by OP).
With that said, if you searched a suspect and found nothing even if they are rev what are they going to do? punch you to death while you have 1 click wonders? They didn't even call out the location either iirc so it's not like he was summoning the revs and needed to be shut down which would have also been justified (probably because they weren't rev).
RogueSteampunker wrote:cedarbridge wrote:What I'm getting from a lot of the players in this thread is that I should bomb the brig every round as a flashed rev. I should do this because sec will go immediately full retard and start genociding the crew because "the kid gloves come off" and their doing so is likely to get them lynched by non-revs. Do you people not realize how stupid this sounds?
And what I'm getting from a few people in this thread is that Sec should just let themselves be slaughtered if they haven't already gotten control of Cargo within the first 5 minutes of a round. They should do this, because it's apparently frowned upon to take lethal action when your main means of nonlethally deconverting revs has been taken away by said Revs. Do you not realize how stupid this sounds?
getting bombed sucks, but taking it out on everyone else is shitty. If you think not being able to kill everyone indiscriminately (note we are still very lax on shitcurity during rev and we even still permit order 66 memes when all hope is lost) for little to no reason is equivalent to you getting killed everytime a flash comes out, then yep sorry you lose. If you think the game is incapable of allowing sec to win without the ability to kill at the drop of a pen, perhaps you should ask for its removal.
Everyone has a vested interest in staying in the game, security included. Do you think people who aren't in the rev enjoy getting killed because of such flimsy reason? We even ban people for purposefully trying to get converted, but it seems like that's the only thing to do when security will kill you upon any transgression done on them during a rev round. This little twist on security becoming the victim when the whole thread is conceived due to security killing literally innocent victims is still very very confusing.
Dax Dupont wrote:Nabski wrote:Dax Dupont wrote:NERDMATH CODE STUFF
So does that mean if I want a higher chance of deconverting before they die, I should use a high force weapon? Or does it even out.
Sorta, I once had someone axe me into deconversion in one hit.
Wielded fireaxe is force set to 24
ergo, 24% chance per hit on full HP. 49% at 50hp for axe vs 10% and 35% for baton.
You will be able to hit them less before they die but if RNGesus is willing you're more likely to deconvert them per hit.
As metagaming is important according to the ban reason, fire axes are technically more efficient.
So next time you suspect someone being a rev, politely axe them if they are one.
Just use a toolbox to head and hit them to crit. Hell heal them up and try once more. If they're not deconverted by then you probably don't have a rev, especially when they didn't do anything rev-like prior except be near a bomb before it exploded
Also knowing how the entirety of rev works ICly so you can call in the deathcamps as soon as possible but considering a method of deconversion (the ONLY way without implants) and how to keep people in the round as metagaming is a bit odd and as I mentioned in the thread means you’re just trying to rack up kills imo.