Any form of "uncooperative/not understanding/etc in ahelps" is admin code for "I bet they'll do this again".
It could be rules lawyering, it could be "fine just ban me then", it could be not taking the ahelp seriously, it could be being a pain in the ass and making the investigation an exercise in CBT.
The implication is that for any myriad of reasons, the person the admin dealt with didn't say any of the spiritual children of the classic "Yup, sorry, my bad, won't do it again" reply.
A little snippet from our internal guide to rule enforcement states:
Punish malice, a lack of empathy, and constant reckless incompetency. A player carrying out actions with a malicious intent to ruin the round for someone else should be taken out. Be careful when deciding that someone was malicious in their actions. Other players might not deliberately act with the intent to grief or be a dick but they display a lack of any ability to empathize or consider the fun of other people. Take these people out too. Lastly, you might constantly find some people who keep on doing things like releasing the singulo setting the supermatter off or being a really horrible head of staff. Sometimes constant advice fixes a person, sometimes they just need to be kept away from certain roles.
These kinds of additions to notes tends to indicate that a player simply doesn't care whether they are or are not breaking the rules and, if they break the rules again, they could well be malicious, lacking empathy or just recklessly incompetent.
It's not a practice I defend, but it's an explanation of what tends to be an admin's thought process when they add snippets to notes about a player being uncooperative.